100 likes | 233 Views
L1VPN Extended Overlay Model. IETF 84 – CCAMP WG. draft-fedyk-ccamp-l1vpn-extnd-overlay-00. Don Fedyk Donald.Fedyk@alcatel-lucent.com Dieter Beller Dieter.Beller@alcatel-lucent.com Lieven Levrau Lieven.Levrau@alcatel-lucent.com. Agenda. Extended L1VPN overlay network model Dual homing
E N D
L1VPN Extended Overlay Model IETF 84 – CCAMP WG draft-fedyk-ccamp-l1vpn-extnd-overlay-00 • Don FedykDonald.Fedyk@alcatel-lucent.com • Dieter Beller Dieter.Beller@alcatel-lucent.com • LievenLevrau Lieven.Levrau@alcatel-lucent.com
Agenda • Extended L1VPN overlay network model • Dual homing • LSP latency constraints • Next steps
Introduction L1VPN Extended Model • This I-D is based on: • RFC4847: Framework and Requirements for Layer 1Virtual Private Networks • draft-belotti-app-statement-l1vpn-em-00: Applicability Statementfor Layer 1 Virtual Private Network (L1VPN) Enhanced Mode • Focusing upon the overlay extension service model UNI • Extensions are including additional constraints: • Diversity for dual homed CEs • Minimal/Upper bound of the end-to-end latency (provider network)
L1VPN Overlay Network Model PE3 PE5 Meshed Provider Network • UNI between CEs and PEs - signaling only, no routing protocol • CE view: cloud + reachability information (other L1VPN CEs) • Provider network provides services on demand • Meshed provider network accommodating multiple L1VPNs UNI UNI CE4 CE3 CE1 CE2 PE1 PE2 UNI UNI P P PE6 PE4 P P
Dual-homing Problem Statement LSP1 PE1 P P PE CE CE LSP2 PE2 P P PE Problem Statement: ensure that LSP1 and LSP2 are mutually disjoint
Option 1: Exchange of SRLG List LSP1 SRLG_IDs(LSP1) PE1 P P PE SRLG_IDs(LSP2) CE CE LSP2 PE2 P P PE SRLG_IDs(LSP1) Exchange of SRLG ID list for disjoint LSPs via source CE node
Option 2: Exchange of Path Affinity Set LSP1 PAS(LSP1) PE1 P P PE CE CE LSP2 PE2 P P PE PAS(LSP1) • Exchange of PAS + LSP ID via source CE node • Dissemination of (PAS, LSP ID, SRLG IDs) among PEs for each L1VPN
Signaling LSP Latency Constraints • Latency requirements for the UNI: • Support of LSP requests with minimal latency • Support of LSP requests with max. acceptable latency (upper bound) • Related to the following CCAMP I-D:draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-02.txt • UNI signaling extensions still to be defined
Next Steps • Solicit feedback/comments from the group • Refinement of dual-homing solution including more detailed signaling extensions • Elaboration of latency chapter including required signaling extensions