200 likes | 454 Views
Faint Supernova or Super-AGB star?: SN 2008S in context. Margaret Meixner STScI Masaaki Otsuka STScI/ASIAA David Riebel JHU SEEDS consortium. SN2008S: Spitzer IRAC 3.6 micron. Day 17. Day 180. Wesson et al. (2009).
E N D
Faint Supernova or Super-AGB star?: SN 2008S in context Margaret Meixner STScI Masaaki Otsuka STScI/ASIAA David Riebel JHU SEEDS consortium
SN2008S: Spitzer IRAC 3.6 micron Day 17 Day 180 Wesson et al. (2009)
WHIRC (WIYN High Resolution InfraRed Camera) field: SN 2008S & SN 2002hh Otsuka et al. submitted
SEEDS: The Search for Evolution of Emission from Dust in Supernovae • Science Goal is to quantify the rate of dust production in Type-II SNe • Track Type-II SNe light curves to very late times and look for simultaneous 3 observational signatures: • Sudden dimming of optical light (HST) • Brightening of mid-IR light (Spitzer) • Blue shifting of spectral lines (Hα, Gemini GMOS)
SN2008S Near-IR light curve Otsuka et al. submitted
SN2008S Near-IR light curve Otsuka et al. submitted
SN2008S Near-IR light curve Otsuka et al. submitted
SN2008S: a faint supernova? Otsuka et al. submitted
SN2008S: a Super-AGB star? comparison to AGB stars in LMC Riebel & Meixner 2011
SN2008S: a Super-AGB star? comparison to AGB stars in LMC Riebel & Meixner 2011
SN2008S: Progenitor SED modelcarbon rich super-AGB star T~380 K L~3.2×104L M~10 M Mloss~5x10-7 M yr-1 Mtot~0.01 M Amorphous carbon Silicates Wesson et al. (2009)
SN 2008S illumination Day 180 Day 17 Wesson et al. (2009)
SN2008S: Day 17 SED T~550 K L~2.2×106 L LTOT~1.5×107 L Amorphous carbon Wesson et al. (2009)
SN2008S: Day 180 SED T~450 K L~3.6×105 L LTOT~1.2×106 L Amorphous carbon Wesson et al. (2009)
Stellar Sources of Dust: Massive Stars Herschel & Characteristics of Dust in Galaxies - Meixner
Conclusions: SN 2008S • Most likely a Super-AGB star • T~380 K • L~3.2×104L • M~10 M • Mloss~5x10-7 M yr-1 • Mtot~0.01 M (2x104yr) • Carbon rich circumstellar dust, interesting, unusual • Significant dust contributor in galaxies: • Dust produced in “pre-explosion” phase • Massive enough could evolve fast enough to be important in early universe • May not destroy its own dust as with SNe • Important to keep monitoring this field to see if we recover a progenitor