140 likes | 245 Views
Review. Memory scores for subjects given three different study sequences: Find the sum of squares between groups, SS treatment 24 25 42 84. Review. Memory scores for subjects given three different study sequences: Find the sum of squares within groups, SS residual 14 30 104 114.
E N D
Review Memory scores for subjects given three different study sequences: Find the sum of squares between groups, SStreatment • 24 • 25 • 42 • 84
Review Memory scores for subjects given three different study sequences: Find the sum of squares within groups, SSresidual • 14 • 30 • 104 • 114
Review Memory scores for subjects given three different study sequences: SStreatment = 84SSresidual = 30 dftreatment = 2 dfresidual = 7 Calculate F, for testing whether the group means are reliably different • 0.8 • 1.25 • 9.8 • 180
Repeated-Measures ANOVA 11/12
Repeated-Measures Design • Multiple measurements for each subject • Different stimulus types, conditions, times, etc. • All measurements are of the same variable, but in different situations • Generalizes paired-samples design • Is there an effect of the treatment? • Variation due to condition, time, stimulus, etc. • Do the means of the measurements vary? • Same null hypothesis as simple ANOVA • m1 = m2 = … = mk
Repeated-Measures Data • Individual differences • Variation from one subject to another • Affects all the scores of any given subject
Accounting for Individual Differences • Individual differences complicate hypothesis testing • Inflate variability of scores • Don’t affect random variability of treatment means • Contribute to all measurements equally • Basic idea • Subtract subject mean for each score • Do simple ANOVA on these differences (dfresidual changes)
Partitioning Variability • Break total variability into treatment, subjects, and residual error • Total variability • Same as before: • Variability due to treatment • Same as before: • Variability due to individual differences • Same idea as SStreatment • Variability of subject means: • Residual variability • Remaining variability • Can calculate directly, but not intuitive
Repeated-Measures ANOVA • Does treatment explain significant portion of variability? • Don't want to penalize for variability due to individual differences • Removing SSsubject reduces SSresidual and makes it a fair comparison • Hypothesis test for repeated-measures ANOVA: • Same as regular ANOVA, except we first remove SSsubject • (SSsubject not meaningful with simple ANOVA because each subject is only in one group) SStotal
Degrees of Freedom dftreatment=k – 1 SStotal dftotal=nk – 1 dfsubject=n – 1 dfresidual= nk – 1 – (k–1) – (n–1) =nk– n – k + 1 .
Review Coffee drinkers are given arithmetic tests on 3 different days: one after drinking coffee, one after decaf, and one with nothing. Find the sum of squares for individual differences, SSsubject • 152 • 558 • 1674 • 2232
Review Coffee drinkers are given arithmetic tests on 3 different days: one after drinking coffee, one after decaf, and one with nothing. SStotal = 1860 SStreatment = 152 SSsubject = 1674 SSresidual = 34 What would SSresidual be if these were 12 unrelated subjects? • 34 • 186 • 1708 • 1826
Review Coffee drinkers are given arithmetic tests on 3 different days: one after drinking coffee, one after decaf, and one with nothing. SStotal = 1860 SStreatment = 152 dftreatment = 2 SSsubject = 1674 dfsubject = 3 SSresidual = 34 dfresidual = 6 Find the F statistic for testingdifferences across conditions • 0.14 • 13.41 • 98.47 • 111.88