120 likes | 228 Views
S eismic wave P ropagation and I maging in C omplex media: a E uropean network. SIMONE CESCA Experienced Researcher Host Institution: University of Hamburg Place of Origin: Milano, Italy Appointment Time: July 2005
E N D
Seismic wave Propagation and Imaging in Complex media: a European network • SIMONE CESCA • Experienced Researcher • Host Institution: University of Hamburg • Place of Origin: Milano, Italy • Appointment Time: July 2005 • Project: Source inversion in volcano seismology: synthetic tests and applications. • Task Groups: TG Small Scale • Cooperation: INGV Oss. Sismologico Arezzo, Univ. College Dublin, CNRS Clermont-Ferrand
Project ScopeSource inversion in volcano seismology: synthetic tests and applications 1. Generation of GF including topography (Tessmer et al., 2003)2. Frequency domain inversion code to retrieve time-dependent volcanic sources 3. Synthetic tests4. Application. The 5 April 2003 Stromboli paroxysmal eruption
MethodSource inversion in volcano seismology: synthetic tests and applications Generation of Green Functions (topography) Data processing INVERSION PROCESS INVERSION * Synthetic data to fit the observations Source mechanism (time-dependent)
MethodSource inversion in volcano seismology: synthetic tests and applications INVERSION FOR A VOLCANIC SOURCE • 1. Source: moment tensor and single force, time dependent, Mpq(t)+Fp(t) • 2. General formulation for displacement: • Un(t) = Mpq(t) * Gnp,q(t) + Fp(t)*Gnp(t) • 3. Frequency domain formulation • Un(w)=ml(w) gnl(w) 4. Inversion process (matrix form, for each frequency value): U [Ntr.x1] = G [Ntr.x9] M [9x1] 5. Constraints on the time-behaviour of source components: by singular value decomposition VOLPIS Code, http://www.spice-rtn.org
Synthetic testsSource inversion in volcano seismology: synthetic tests and applications Test 1, Kilauea, Hawaii Test 2, Stromboli Model Geometry, earth structure Fit Different constraints on time behaviour of source components: …retrieving focal depth and epicentral location.
Stromboli, 5 April 2003: overview Source inversion in volcano seismology: synthetic tests and applications 28.12.2002 Flank eruption interrupts typical Strombolian activity30.12.2002 Landslides at Sciara del Fuoco (SDF) generate a tsunamiJan/Feb 2003 Effusive activity at SDF (fissure 500m)Feb/Apr 2003 Effusive activity at SDF (fissure 670m)5 April 2003 Paroxysmal explosion from the upper craters: first emission of gas and ash, followed by a large blast and pyroclastic flow Modeling of source mechanism and eruption dynamic by the inversion of broadband seismic data
Stromboli, 5 April 2003: seismic data Source inversion in volcano seismology: synthetic tests and applications VLP precursor signal High-frequency blast signal
Stromboli, 5 April 2003: inversion (VLP) Source inversion in volcano seismology: synthetic tests and applications 1. Tensile crack Dip-slip thrust mechanism Misfit ~ 0.15 Fits of displacements: 2. Shear crack M0=1.64x1015Nm, MW=4.0 3. Pure isotropic source (worse fit)
Stromboli, 5 April 2003: inversion (blast) Source inversion in volcano seismology: synthetic tests and applications Source components Fits of displacements Moment Tensor (x1016 Nm) Displacement (m) Single Force (x109 N) Time (s) Time (s) M0=0.61x1015Nm, MW=3.8
Stromboli, 5 April 2003: modelingSource inversion in volcano seismology: synthetic tests and applications a) 30.12.02-15.2.03 c) 5.4.03, VLP signal b) 15.2-1.4.03 d) 5.4.03, Paroxysm NW-SE cross section of Stromboli topography. Geometry of the focal mechanism responsible for the VLP signal, showing station location and a sketch of the upper conduit.
Conclusions VOLPIS Code for the inversion of volcanic events Synthetic tests proving stability of the inversion, retrieval of time-dependent source components, additional information on source depth and location Application to the 5 April 2003 Stromboli paroxysmal eruptionModelling of the whole eruptive process: as a consequence of the increased pressure of the dike, a slow dip-slip thrust mechamism occurs along the preferential plane of a pre-existing fracture. This mechanism mechanically triggers the opening of the upper conduit and the paroxysm. Estimations of the slip at the fault give values in the range 0.2-0.8m.Related publications:Cesca and Dahm (2006), Computers and Geosciences, submitted.Cesca, Braun, Tessmer and Dahm (2006), Earth and Planetary Science Letters, submitted.