140 likes | 149 Views
This document provides recommendations for tariff changes from the Regional Tariff Working Group. It includes revisions to timing requirements, incorporation of NERC Next-Hour-Market provisions, a new attachment for flexible use transmission service, scheduling penalty revisions, and updates to TLR procedures. It also addresses ROFR issues and ongoing considerations of major issues.
E N D
Tariff Change Recommendations to the Commercial Practices Committee From the Regional Tariff Working Group
RTWG Roster • Company Representative • AEP-West Mr. Dennis Bethel Member (TO) • Arkansas Electric CooP. Corp.Mr. Ricky Bittle Chair (TC) • Coral Power TradingMr. Rick Rucker Member (TC) • Dynegy Marketing and TradeMs. Kim Casey Member (TC) • Empire District Elect. Co.Mr. Rick McCord Member (TO) • ENRON Power Marketing, Inc.Mr. Ron McNamara Member (TC) • East Texas Electric CooperativeMr. Wayne Miller Member (TC) • Jonesboro City Water and Light Mr. Rick Henley Member (TC) • Kansas City Power & LightMr. Ron Kite Member (TO) • KPL, Western Resources, Inc.Mr. Dennis Reed Vice-Chair (TO) • Missouri Public Svc. Comm.Mr. Mike Proctor Member • OG+E Electric ServicesMr. John Gunesch Jr.Member (TO) • Oklahoma Municipal Power Mr. Gene Anderson Member (TC) • Southwest Power PoolMr. Pat Bourne Secretary • Southwestern Power Admin.Mr. James Sherwood Member (TO) • Southwestern Public Service Co.Mr. David Grover Member (TO) • Tenaska Power Services Co.Mr. Mark Foreman Member (TC) • Western Farmers ElectricMr. Gary Roulet Member (TO)
Recommended Changes • Revise Attachment P – Timing Requirements for Reservations & Schedules • Incorporate NERC Next-Hour-Market Provisions • Include new Attachment Y – Flexible Use Transmission Service (Experimental) • Revise Scheduling Penalty Provisions -(Sec. 13.7) • Revise NERC TLR Procedures • Revise Sections 2.2 and 22 – Reservation Priority and Right of First Refusal
Revise Attachment P • Background • Attachment P Timing Specifications are not compliant with FERC Order 638 • Although present Attachment P specifications may be arguably better than Order 638 specifications, standardization with adjoining Transmission Providers was viewed to be the greater good • Recommendation • Approve the revisions which reflect compliance
Include Next-Hour-Market Provisions • Background • NERC has proposed tariff modifications which have been approved by the FERC • Recommendation • Approve incorporation of the FERC approved language into the SPP OATT to Facilitate Next-Hour-Market activities
Add New Attachment Y • Background • The EOC has approved a phased implementation of the proposal to increase transmission system utilization • The proposed new Attachment Y provides for a one-year experimental implementation of the first phase • Recommendation • Approve the addition of Attachment Y to the SPP OATT
Scheduling Penalty Change • Background • The proposed change reduces the penalty to 200% of actual excess use • SPP scheduling software has been modified to reject tags that are in excess of the corresponding reservation • Recommendation • Approve the proposed revisions to Sec. 13.7
Revise TLR Procedures • Background • NERC has revised its TLR Procedures • NERC has recently revised its IDC to implement the new procedures • Procedures included in the SPP OATT as Attachment R require replacement • Recommendation • Approve a revision to Attachment R which states that currently effective NERC TLR Procedures are incorporated by reference
Sections 2.2 and 22 ROFR Issues • Background • ROFR issues discussed extensively at the RTWG • These revisions clarify the rights and obligations of both incumbent and new customers
Sections 2.2 ROFR Issues • Change Time Frame to Respond to a competing request • Notify Both there is a competing Request • System Impact Study • Current User with ROFR must respond within 60 days of notification of a contingent service agreement • Customer given reservation pays for System Impact Study, If competing request is awarded any service it pays
Sections 22 ROFR Issues • Clarify that requesting a change in path for an existing firm transmission reservation with remaining term of less than 1 year does not have ROFR • Treated as a new request
Sections 2.2 and 22 ROFR Issues • Recommendation • Approve the proposed revisions to Sec.2.2 and Sec. 22
Ongoing Consideration of Major Issues • Tariff modifications for state retail restructuring programs • Pro Forma Generation Interconnection Agreement • Consistent standards for rate basing transmission facilities • Ultimate rate design for SPP Tariff