1 / 13

Board of Human Sciences Benchmark Survey

This report provides an overview of the Board of Human Sciences Benchmark Survey conducted in 2009, including respondent details, contact information, survey amendments, and reasons for reporting/non-reporting. The report aims to assist institutions with peer comparison and improve future surveys.

tgannon
Download Presentation

Board of Human Sciences Benchmark Survey

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Board of Human SciencesBenchmark Survey Jolene Hamm

  2. Reporting for 2009 Survey • Respondents • 46 institutions reporting • 25BOHS • 40 CAFCS • Contacted • 144 institutions (CAFCS & BOHS) • 32 % response rate

  3. Contact Details • Contacted 144 institutions • Minimum of 3 times by email • Minimum of 2 times by phone • Weekly correspondences with Dr. Jorgensen and Dr. Martin providing update. • FAEIS hours contributed to this project: • February-May 2010 • 568 approximate hours

  4. BoHS Survey Amendments • Institutions contacted to confirm continuation of CIP codes from previous year • Continued use of 00.9999: Total Combined/Unclassified/Multidiscipline • Changed name from “the BOHS Benchmarking Survey” to the “Human Sciences Survey” • Initial use of “Unable to Report” option

  5. Consecutively Reporting Institutions N= 24

  6. Top Reasons for Reporting • Availability of Results in Report Builder • Assisting with peer comparison • Availability of the “Unable to Report” option

  7. Top 5 Reasons for Non-reporting • Loss of personnel for reporting purposes • Transitioning colleges • Availability of data to specificity • Unable to donate time of personnel to provide report • Did not feel survey benefited institution

  8. Next Year • Continue to increase number of institutions reporting • Maintain number of consecutively reporting institutions

  9. FAEIS2002-2010 Student Survey Participant for BOHS Institutions

  10. Questions

More Related