1 / 25

High resolution LMK-simulations (1 km) for extreme precipitation events in southern Germany

High resolution LMK-simulations (1 km) for extreme precipitation events in southern Germany. J.W. Schipper Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research, University of Karlsruhe. Content. EU-Project PREVIEW Simulations Event 2002 First evaluation of simulations Event 2005. EU-IP PREVIEW.

tgraves
Download Presentation

High resolution LMK-simulations (1 km) for extreme precipitation events in southern Germany

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. High resolution LMK-simulations (1 km)for extreme precipitation events in southern Germany J.W. SchipperInstitute for Meteorology and Climate Research, University of Karlsruhe

  2. Content • EU-Project PREVIEW • Simulations • Event 2002 • First evaluation of simulations • Event 2005

  3. EU-IP PREVIEW Volcanoes Many risks exist ... Fires Earthquakes Windstorms Man-made Landslides Floods

  4. EU-IP PREVIEW GEO-INFORMATION SERVICES FOR RISK MANAGEMENT ON A EUROPEAN LEVEL PREVIEW – PREVention, Information, and Early Warning

  5. EU-IP PREVIEW

  6. EU-IP PREVIEW PREVIEW: PREVention, Information, and Early Warning • Large `Integrated Project´ (IP) of the European Union (EU) - 56 partner! • Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK) is involved in the FLOODING part • Short-Range Forecasting (until 3 days) • Partner: IWS, BfG, LfU, IÖR, InfoTerra, Geomer • Medium-Range Forecasting (between 3 and 10 days) Partner: DWD, ECMWF, ARPA-SIM, JRC, BfG, VITUKI, Delft-Hydraulics

  7. Area of interest

  8. Time period Period with heavy precipitation: August 2002 Precipitation amout 6-12 Aug. 2002 in Bavaria, Germany • Rainfall amounts: • 6th & 7th August 2002 • 139 mm (Ruhpolding) • 133 mm (Aschau/Chiemgau) • 10th August 2002 • 78 mm (Baiern-Kleinrohrsdorf) • 62 mm (Kempten) Source: Hochwassernachrichtendienst, Bayerisches Landesamt für Wasserwirtschaft

  9. 2800 m 1000 m 7000 m 3.235 m 3.444 m Max. height: 2.918 m Orography

  10. Simulations 7000 m2800 m1000 m August 2002 Rainfall rates 1 5 10 15 20 25 30 7000 m 2800 m Radar 1000 m Stationen mm

  11. Simulations 7000 m2800 m1000 m August 2002 Rainfall rates 1 5 10 15 20 25 30 7000 m 2800 m Radar 1000 m Stationen mm

  12. Event 2002

  13. Resolutions

  14. Cross-section result for 12th August 2002

  15. Cross-section result for 7th August 2002

  16. Cross-section result for 7th August 2002

  17. Comparisons

  18. C: total hits N: total events E: correct by chance Heidke Skill Score a: hit b: false alarm c: failure d: inverse hit

  19. Heidke Skill Score Possible question: How well does my model perform on 12th August 2002? Results for 12th August 2002 (using a criterium of 10 mm/day): HSS1000m = 0.21 HSS2800m = 0.03 HSS7000m = -0.01 A disadvantage is the arbitrarily chosen criterium of 10 mm/day.

  20. Heidke Skill Score result for 12th August 2002

  21. 2800 m resolution 7000 m resolution Heidke Skill Score result for 12th August 2002 1000 m resolution

  22. Heidke Skill Score result for 12th August 2002

  23. Event 2005 20.08.2005 07:00 – 21.08.2005 06:00 21.08.2005 07:00 – 22.08.2005 06:00

  24. Event 2005 Messungenmeteorologisches Modell 20 • Aichstetten • Wiblingen Niederschlag [mm] 0 • Kempten • Breitachklamm Periode: 20. August 2005 0:00 bis 22. August 2005 23:00

  25. Summary • Finished 10-day period in 2002 • Finished 3-day period in 2005 • Started first comparisons with measurement stations • Comparisons with radar data needs to be done

More Related