220 likes | 373 Views
Acronyms Defined. SMSShort text message serviceWAPWireless application protocol. SMS. Text messaging service offered as part of 1XRTT suite of digital mobility servicesOperates in the control channel bandwidth allocation of the mobile spectrumDoes not consume voice channel bandwidth160 byte me
E N D
1. SMS and WAP Brian Soldera/Timo Hiiback
BUS5233 Seminar in e-Business
November 13, 2006
2. Acronyms Defined SMS
Short text message service
WAP
Wireless application protocol
3. SMS Text messaging service offered as part of 1XRTT suite of digital mobility services
Operates in the control channel bandwidth allocation of the mobile spectrum
Does not consume voice channel bandwidth
160 byte message length
Includes headers and text in total
Standard functionality in most current handsets
4. SMS Most carriers offer SMS messaging:
Mobile to mobile
Mobile to web
Web to mobile
Offered on either a per message sent basis or on a flat rate (unlimited messages) basis
Billed to the originator of the message
5. SMS Acceptance Penetration rates in Europe higher outside of North America
Monthly mobile rates higher in Europe
SMS provides a means to communicate free of charge without incurring minutes/usage
Bypass of metered access plan arrangements
Higher overall mobility penetration
6. SMS Acceptance More popular with 15-40 age range
Effective in noisy environments and or environments were being quiet is a requirement
Acceptance of new forms of communication, short forms, methods of data entry
Cost mitigation able to spend money on other items
7. Issues with SMS Awkward input with standard keyboards
Shortcuts via:
Character sets - :)
Short forms - cu l8tr
Set based predictive algorithms in handsets
Fill in words based upon few characters
Not as much an issue with smart phones ie Palm Treo 650 (with character keypads)
Interoperability between carriers
SMSC interconnections
8. Issues with SMS 160 Character message length
Multiple messages can be parsed together
Network equipment vendor pricing policies for some Telcos
SMS licensing to carriers priced on a per user basis
Carriers cannot cost effectively offer to the entire subscriber base
SMS user base inherently limited
Critical mass never achieved
Other uses being sought to improve business case
Ie: OTAPA Over the air set programming
9. Current Hot SMS Applications Premium SMS
Contests For Example:
Canadian and American Idol voting
Rock Star Supernova voting
Subway NHL promotion
Established through Industry coordination
Short code support and agreement
Content aggregators are the coordination point
Carriers bill subs., reconcile with content providers
10. Other SMS Applications Targeted Advertising
Usually originated via e-mail
Mobile spam?
Retrieval of WAP purchased mobile services
Ring tones Retrieval URL sent via SMS
Purchasing of goods and services
Billed by mobile service provider
Alternative to e-mail
Where computer to computer communications is expensive
11. SMS Conclusion New applications are driving SMS use
Primarily used by youth, younger adults
Alternative to e-mail
Still a via viable mobile service for carriers, especially premium SMS
Character entry is clumsy
Other applications such as Push to Talk may replace SMS usage
12. WAP Wireless Application Protocol
13. History In 1997 several mobile phone manufacturers organized an industry group to develop standards for wireless applications
Intent is to bridge the gap between Mobile Devices and the Internet
14. WAP Features Wireless Mark-up Language (WML)- Like HTML but adapted for devices
WML Script
Wireless Telephony Application (WTA)
WAP Server Gateway to the web and a transcriber of content to suit set display capabilities
Programming Model similar to the Internet-allows researching on a large number of servers each addressed by a universal resource locator (URL)
15. How WAP works
16. Success Hundreds of companies supported this initiative.
Access to more content from Mobile Devices
Access to News / Sports
Access to m-commerce from anywhere within network access.
Targeted Marketing
17. Failures/Challenges Industry
Low adoption rates
Low channel bandwidth, round-trip delays and lack of security.
Rendering of application is different depending on the device.
Perception that new technologies will make WAP obsolete (i.e. 3 G networks capable of handling large volumes of data and video).
Technology champions seem to want to lock their customers into a single gateway
18. Challenges Industry (continued):
Mobile IP and Java enabled phones are working quickly to replace WAP.
iMode Internet Web sites have teamed up with NTTs DoCoMo.
These alternatives have lower switching costs.
Low voltage cellphone batteries
Low power processing chips
19. Challenges / Limitations User
Screen size is small -> 6 line display
Cell Phones have limited memory
Traditional phone keypads are cumbersome.
May take many keystrokes to enter information or URLs
Restricted use of cursor and button controls
Not user friendly
Takes a long time to get connected
20. Conclusion SMS
Continues to be popular in certain areas of the world
North American acceptance is low
Usage limited by handset functionality
WAP
While WAP itself may not survive, m-commerce certainly will
Technology will mature and technical transport and handset related issues will be overcome.
21. References Condos, C., James, A., Every, P., and Simpson, T. (2002). Ten usability principles for the development of effective WAP and m-commerce services, Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 54, No. 6, 2002, pp. 345-355.
Fenesh, T. (2002). Exploratory study into wireless application protocol shopping, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 30, No. 10, 2002, pp. 482-497.
Heinonen, K., and Strandvik, T. (2005). Communication as and element of service value, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 186-198.
Kumar, V., Parimi, S., and Agarwar, D.P. (2003). WAP Present and Future, Pervasive Computing, 2003, pp. 79-83.
Lai, T.L. (2004). Service Quality and Perceived Values Impact on Satisfaction, Intention, and Usage of Short Message Service (SMS), Information System Frontiers, 6: 4, pp. 353-368.
Mallat, N., Rossi, M., Tuunainen, V.K. (2004). Mobile Banking Services, Communications of the ACM, May 2004, Vol. 47,No. 5, pp. 42-46.
22. References Ramsay, M. (2001). Mildly irritating: a WAP usability study, Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 53, No. 4, April 2001, pp. 141-158.
Rettie, R., Grandcolas, U., and Deakins, B. (2005). Text message advertising: Response rates and Branding effects, Journal of Targeting, Measurement, and Analysis for Marketing, August 2005, pp. 304-312.
Shih, G. and Shim, S.S.Y. (2002). A Service Management Framework for M-Commerce Applications, Mobile Networks and Applications, June 2002, pp. 199-212.
Xu, G. and Gutierrez, J.A. (2006). An Exploratory Study of Killer Applications and Critical Success Factors in M-Commerce, Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, Vol. 4, No. 4, July-September 2006, pp. 63-79.
Zhang, X. and Prybutok, V. (2005). How the Mobile Communications Markets Differ in China, the U.S., and Europe, Communications of the ACM, March 2005, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 111-114.