1 / 30

Forensic Hydrology

Forensic Hydrology. Mark Williams, CU-Boulder. What is “Forensic Hydrology”. Geoscientists are really “Geodectives” forensic geochemistry and forensic geology were terms to describe the use of geochemical or geological techniques to identify potential sources of contamination.

thais
Download Presentation

Forensic Hydrology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Forensic Hydrology Mark Williams, CU-Boulder

  2. What is “Forensic Hydrology” Geoscientists are really “Geodectives” forensic geochemistry and forensic geology were terms to describe the use of geochemical or geological techniques to identify potential sources of contamination. approach is predicated on forensic earth sciences.

  3. Tool Chest of the Forensic Hydrologist Flowpath examination Geochemical analysis Water isotopes Fingerprinting techniques be used to trace specific contaminants of concern (CoCs). Element/element ratios, isotopes, leachate waters Don’t over-interpret the use of “fingerprinting”! Choose the right mix Hurst, SWH 2008

  4. Case Study: Mojave powerplant fly ash Were heavy metals present in flyash generated by coal combustion being transported to local surface waters and water in embayments along the Colorado River? Hurst, SWH 2008

  5. Case Study: Consumptive use of Colorado River water DISPUTE: Groundwater wells in AZ and CA pumping Colorado River water? Several thousand wells SOLUTION: Reclamation proposed an “accounting surface” method to address wells outside the flood plain. The method relies on a hydraulic criterion: wells that have a static water-level elevation equal to or below the published accounting surface are presumed to yield water that will be replaced by water from the river.

  6. Case Study: Consumptive use of Colorado River water CRITICISM: the method does not provide direct evidence that a well yields mainstream water. SOLUTION: A method that could distinguish between withdrawals of mainstream or locally recharged tributary water would be a welcome advance.

  7. Guay and Eastoe, SWH 08

  8. Map of Colorado River watershed showing the Lower Colorado River Basin (shaded) and Topock Marsh study area Guay and Eastoe, SWH 08

  9. 3 distinct source waters Locally recharged precipitation “Older (pre-1950’s)” groundwater Perhaps even pre-dam waters Third, there is “recent” (post-1950) Colorado River water, which includes Topock Marsh samples.

  10. Forensic Insights Without isotopic data, the accounting surface falls short because it can only demonstrate the physical potential for water movement from the river toward a well. Conventional geochemical data are useful but rarely provide a direct indication of a water’s source. Isotopes, on the other hand, can and have resolved water resource disputes in many situations.

  11. Combine forensic approach with awatershed approach

  12. WHY WATERSHED APPROACH? Explicitly incorporates spatial dimensions Treat streamwater as a mixture of source waters and/or flowpaths Apply to any water body -wells, lakes, wetlands, storm drainage, etc Develop inverse models that allow us to “unmix” samples and identify source waters and flowpaths

  13. WATER QUALITY IN STREAMS ANDRIVERS IS THE END PRODUCT OF ALLPROCESSES IN THE BASIN

  14. Kim Raby collects water quality samples outside of Silverton, Colorado

  15. MIXTURE APPROACH APPLY THE SAME CONCEPTS TO OTHER HYDROLOGIC FEATURES IRRIGATION SYSTEMS WELLS WETLANDS SETTLING PONDS SEPTIC SYSTEMS SOURCES OF WATER TO SYSTEMS FATE OF WATER FROM THESE SYSTEMS

  16. SOURCE WATERS Initial source of water that contributes to a mixture: stream, well, settling pond, etc Empirically defined “OLD” is water stored prior to the precipitation event “NEW” is water from current precip event

  17. SOURCE WATERS Two main types: PRECIPITATION GROUNDWATER (FRACTURE FLOW) Can be septic system release, landfill plume, acid mine drainage, irrigation water, etc Main requirement is that the different source waters haveUNIQUE GEOCHEMICAL/ISOTOPIC SIGNALS

  18. FLOWPATHS Flowpaths are the routes that water takes from the source area to the mixture The hydrogeologic setting of the flowpath alters the geochemical/isotopic content of the source water

  19. FLOWPATH TYPES Hortonian Overland Flow Saturation Excess Flow Return Flow Groundwater Piston Pumping Translatory Flow

  20. Challenge to forensic hydrology Each of these source waters has a unique geochemical and isotopic fingerprint Each of the flowpaths contributes a unique signiture to the “mixture” Challenge: unmix “FINGERPRINTS” measured in stream flow to quantify source waters and flowpaths

  21. Hortonian Overland Flow

  22. Infiltration greater than thought Measure rate of fall in inner ring Infilration http://www.alwi.com/wastewater.php

  23. Hydrology 101 Old reliance on Hortonian overland flow is not valid Much higher rates of infiltration than previously thought “Groundwater” not a uniform body because of preferential flowpaths Isotopes combined with watershed approach can help

  24. Summary Forensic approach. Toolchest includes Flowpath analysis Water isotopes Geochemical tracers “Environmental fingerprints” Combine with watershed approach Identify sources of contaminants of concern by “unmixing” water samples

More Related