160 likes | 293 Views
EUROP 1st EUROP Workshop Product Scenarios and Technology Roadmap. Workshop agenda. Day 1 morning : Plenary meeting Working groups organization Day 1 afternoon : Working group activities Day 2 morning : Working group activities Day 2 afternoon : Synthesis and homework.
E N D
EUROP1st EUROP WorkshopProduct Scenarios and Technology Roadmap
Workshop agenda • Day 1 morning : • Plenary meeting • Working groups organization • Day 1 afternoon : • Working group activities • Day 2 morning : • Working group activities • Day 2 afternoon : • Synthesis and homework
Plenary meeting topics • FP6 / Call 6 : • to be confirmed the 30th Nov, open date; 1st December, closing date ; 31st April, 36 Meuros for robotics. • Security is not part of the Call 6 topics ! • SRA roadmap • To be issued by end of March • Workshop process and homework to match this objective • Workshop 1: Product roadmap (22 – 23 Nov) • Workshop 2 : Product roadmap consolidation and technology roadmap emergence (17 – 18 Jan , Roma or Paris as back up , to be confirm the 2nd of December) • Workshop 3 : (in March in Paris ) Technology roadmap consolidation • EURON / EUROP relationship • At the technology roadmap emergence milestone, to be organized in February for the second workshop
Participants from Website registration PROFESSIONAL SECTOR SAGEM DS R U Robots Robosoft HTR intelsys DLR RM SINTERS ZTS VVU KOSICE a.s THALES EADS NV PGES LAAS-CNRS KUKA Roboter GmbH QinetiQ K-Team Oxford Technologies Ltd ITechnic Ltd ECA Telerobot Saab AB CEA Deltatronics Acrobot Company Ltd. Reis Robotics PHILIPS INDUSTRY SECTOR SAGEM DS R U Robots intelsys SINTERS ZTS VVU KOSICE a.s. Neuronics AG EADS NV REIKU KUKA Roboter GmbH Telerobot CEA Reis Robotics PHILIPS EUnited Robotics DOMESTIC SECTOR SAGEM DS Robosoft intelsys Electrolux AB THALES LAAS-CNRS K-Team iTechnic Ltd Telerobot CEA PHILIPS SPACE SECTOR SAGEM DS intelsys Dassault Aviation DLR RM SINTERS EADS Space TransportationEADS Space Astrium Galileo Avionica S.p.A. EADS NV LAAS-CNRS REIKU KUKA Roboter GmbH IAI European Space Agency Oxford Technologies Ltd Finmeccanica Telerobot SECURITY SECTOR SAGEM DS R U Robots Robosoft intelsys Dassault Aviation EADS Space Transportation ZTS VVU KOSICE a.s. Neuronics AG THALES EADS Space Astrium Galileo Avionica S.p.A. EADS NV PGES LAAS-CNRS EADS CRC Germany QinetiQ IAI Oxford Technologies Ltd Finmeccanica iTechnic Ltd ECA Telerobot Saab AB BAE Systems CEA More than 50 attendees for the workshop
Product Scenario Submission • Initial call for ideas prior to the workshop • Fast and first evaluation to filter by working group chair following criterias : • Market and clients • Innovation and originality • Clarity and presentation • Technical Strength • Relevance to challenges • More than 70 scenarios have been generated before the workshop • Working group leaders utilize a method guide to process the scenarios to emerge products and technologies.
Role of WG chairs and co-chairs • Chair : • Organise working groups (consolidation groups and creation groups) • Schedule and manage speech timeline • Ensure a fair contribution of all the workshop stakeholders • Ensure product scenario objectives are met, in terms of balance, coverage and consistency • Co-chair : • Performs a synthesis of the working group outcome • Support the chair in its role and to guarantee the consistency of the production
Working Group leaders • WG Industry: • WGL : COMAU WGCL : EUnited • WG Professional services: • WGL : Deltatronics WGCL : CEA • WG Security Robots: • WGL : Alenia WGCL: RURobots • WG Space Robots: • WGL : EADS WGCL : Gallileo Avionica • Domestic Services: • WGL : PHILIPS WGCL : ITechnic
Workshop Process Initial review and evaluation(comitee) Product Scenario Generation Day 1 Product Scenario Refinement and Consolidation Day 2 Process example 12h00-12h30 • Presentation 9h00-10h45 • each group presents product scenario updates and new scenarios • 6 minutes each, includig Q&A • Presentation 13h30-16h00 • each author present product scenarios • 10 minutes including Q&A • Scenario Selection 11h00-12h15 • Final Consolidation • Cochair prepares synthesis • Scenario workout 16h20-18h30 • in small groups: • 1 Consolidation groups based on accepted scenario: • merging / combination • scenario breakdown • refinement & simplification • 2 Creation groups • Define missing scenario (domotic) Synthesis (plenary) Day 2 Industry, Professional and Security : 13h30-15h30 Space & Domestic : 15H50-17h10
Scenario Generation (Day 1) • Product Scenario • Deployment / Exploitation Environment • Key Features • Technological requirements • Product Roadmap PS A PS B PS AB + Combining PS A PS A1 PS A2 Dividing , Simplifying, completing or improving PS A PS A ’ Use method guides and evaluation criterias
Scenario worksheet (Day 1 & 2) Refinement and Consolidation Deployment / Exploitation Environment Key Features • Assumptions (hazards, failures, ...) • Environment/ Exploitation Requirements (operator safety, …) • Actors, Missions and Interactions (Human , Robots, C3I) • Functions (mobility, grasping, diagnose…) • Systems Requirements (safety, …) • Design invariants (distributed sensing, …) • Others Technological Requirements Product Roadmap • Components • Systems Engineering • Human Factors • Advanced Behaviors • Micro-Nano-Robotics • Robotic Technologies • Others • Business Model • Commercialisation Structure • Production Aspects • Logistics • Product Schedule • Non EU competitors
Product Scenario : example guide (1/4) Deployment / Exploitation Environment • Assumptions: • energy exhausted, • loss of communication, • Environment/ Exploitation Requirements: • remain within com distance from the C&C) • manage energy • partial autonomy (perception and planning) • Actors • Multiple rovers, • Planetary C&C, • earth station • Missions • perform mapping, • change modules, • operate sample return • Interactions • Remotely controled from the C&C • Remotely controled from earth via the C&C.
Product Scenario : example guide (2/4) Key Features • Functions (mobility, grasping, diagnose…) • Systems Requirements (safety, …) • Design invariants (distributed sensing, …) • Others Refuel and mission module change Seismic, meteo sensor, com relay Sample grasp and camera Driller and camera • Basic Functions • Navigate • Dock • Drill and Collect Sample • Sense and localise • Solar power refuel • Sensor deployment • Communication relay • Coordinate with others • Simple sample analysis • System Requirements: • Modularity of interfaces • Rover Safety • C2 safety when docking • Real time control • Design invariants: • Interface with C2 • Local autonomy (perception, navigation, actuation loops) Refuel (solar panel) and mobility Operate, perform mission
Product Scenario : example guide (3/4) Components Communications Optronics Actuation Mobility Systems Engineering Safety, dependability Real-time Modularity Advanced Behaviors Coordination and resource allocation Automatic planning and scheduling, resource management Diagnosis Reconfiguration Model Predictive Control / Adaptive control Expert systems for automated analysis System conflict detection and resolution Robotic technologies Grasping Docking Mobility in low / strong gavity
2008 2008 2010 2014 2015 R&D Platform developement R&D Control and Command Launch Product Scenario : example guide (4/4) Product Roadmap ESA • Business Model • Commercialisation Structure • Production Aspects • Logistics • Product Schedule • Non EU competitors Business Model Public Industrial • Competitors: • NASA • NASDA • …
Merging example Solar panel Robotic Arm Modular unit Mobility • Similar • Environment • Deployment scenarios • Sys. Requirements • Design invariants • Control / Command
Synthesis and next step For each scenario: • Brief description according to the template • Have we got product? • Work to consolidate (refinement, other scenarii, …) Technological trends • What is the picture? • Do we have consensus within each WG ? Homework before the workshop 2(17 – 18 Jan) • Each groups shall consolidate the work according to supplied template (products and technologies). Outcomes expected by the year end • Each groups shall provide complementary scenarii if necessary to cover missing areas. Outcomes expected by the year end. • Sagem to provide beginning of next year a homogeneous synthesis of the workshop outcomes