170 likes | 293 Views
Fish identification course for fisheries law enforcement officers: Communicating scientific principles and methods where none existed. Ofer Gon , Gavin Gouws and Monica Mwale South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Private Bag 1015, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa. The Learners.
E N D
Fish identification course for fisheries law enforcement officers: Communicating scientific principles and methods where none existed Ofer Gon, Gavin Gouws and Monica Mwale South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Private Bag 1015, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa
The Learners • DEAT fisheries law enforcement officers • Age group: 23-39 • Education: Matric certificate with little or no knowledge of biology
Job description – Why do the course? • Enforcing fishing regulations (Marine Living Resource Act) through: • beach patrols • Boat inspections • Testifying in court cases of illegal fishers and poachers Must be able to identify the fishes and defend the identification in court
Course objectives • Learning the different parts (morphology) of the body of the fish • Learning to take counts and measurements from a fish specimens and how they are used
Classification Family: Sciaenidae Genus: Argyrosomus Species: japonicus Scientific Names Carcharias taurus Argyrosomusjaponicus Course objectives • Understanding certain concepts, eg, scientific names, classification
Course objectives • Learning about and using identification keys – Biological similarity
Course programme Day 1 • Tour of SAIAB and the fish collection • Internet and library resources • Fish morphology and its methodology • Working with specimens - practical
Course programme Day 2 • The marine environment • Fish systematics (names and classification) • Identification keys and how they work • Fish identification - practical
Course programme Days 3 & 4 • The coelacanth story • Fish identification – practical • Practical test
Expected learning about particular species Too scientific, a lot of terminology, course too short Lab chairs uncomfortable, sensitivity to alcohol fumes Questionnaire results
Many learners expressed a wish for more courses Course experience
Teachers’ observations • Learners had inadequate skills in maths – could not calculate percentages without assistance and did not understand proportions • They were weak in terms English language reading and comprehension, and general knowledge • They had a difficulty with abstract thinking and little analytical skill (at least partly due to language) • These weaknesses required much teacher – learner interaction • Nevertheless, they were generally highly motivated to increase their knowledge practical skills
Conclusions • By their own admission, the learners acquired a lot of new knowledge, but they will need more practical experience under supervision to become proficient and confident in fish identification • Considering their educational background, the novelty of the subject and the duration of the course the learners performed well • There is a need to develop a more user-friendly fish identification tool
Acknowledgements We thank management, and members of staff of SAIAB and DEAT for their assistance and support in running the fish identification courses.