80 likes | 170 Views
How to evaluate a piece of research. Meaning a study. Generalisability (S E T). Can this piece of research generalise to the target population? Is the sample representative?
E N D
How to evaluate a piece of research Meaning a study
Generalisability (S E T) • Can this piece of research generalise to the target population? Is the sample representative? • Can this piece of research generalise to the real world? where was it conducted? Does it have ecological validity • Does the task that ppts were asked to do have mundane realism? Would you do it in everyday life? • So is the research imited in any way? The setting? The task? The sample? S E T
Reliability • If this piece of research was replicated would you get the same or very similar results? • Has is been standardised? • Are the controls clearly described? • Can we trust the results
Application • Is this piece of research USEFUL? • Does it have real world application? • Who benefits from the results or conclusion of this research?
Validity • Does this research actually measure what it set out to measure ? • Were there any obvious confounding variables? • Did Bartlett actually investigate schemas and reconstructive memory or did he accidentally measure something else instead?
Ethics • Is the research ethical? • Does it breach any of the ethical guidelines laid down by the BPS/APS • DRI PP • More on this later
GRAVE • Evaluating research is a GRAVE issue