1 / 41

Balk, Nazarenko & Zakharov, 1990 LH transitions in plasmas. Barotropic governor.

Feedback Loop in 2D: Formation of Zonal Jets and Suppression of Turbulence Sergey Nazarenko, Warwick, UK. Balk, Nazarenko & Zakharov, 1990 LH transitions in plasmas. Barotropic governor. Drift waves in fusion devices. Rossby waves in atmospheres of rotating planets.

thom
Download Presentation

Balk, Nazarenko & Zakharov, 1990 LH transitions in plasmas. Barotropic governor.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Feedback Loop in 2D:Formation of Zonal Jets and Suppression of Turbulence Sergey Nazarenko, Warwick, UK • Balk, Nazarenko & Zakharov, 1990 • LH transitions in plasmas. • Barotropic governor.

  2. Drift waves in fusion devices Rossby waves in atmospheres of rotating planets

  3. Charney-Hasegawa-Mima equation • Ψ– streamfunction (electrostatic potential). • ρ – Deformation radius (ion Larmor radius). • β – PV gradient (diamagnetic drift). • x – east-west (poloidal arc-length) • y – south-north (radial length).

  4. Baroclinic instability and ITG • Close analogy between the baroclinic instability and the ion-temperature gradient instability in tokamak. • GFD: two-layer model. • Plasma: Hasegawa-Wakatani model for plasma potential and density.

  5. Low-to-High confinement transitions in fusion plasmas • LH transition discovered in the ASDEX tokamak (Wagner,1982) and now routinely observed in most tokamaks and stellarators. • Left: Heliac data (Shats et al, 2004) • ZF generation • DW suppression

  6. LH transition paradigm • Small-scale turbulence causes anomalous transport, hence L-mode. • Negative feedback loop. • Suppressed turbulence →no transport →improved confinement & H-mode. Balk, SN and Zakharov 1990

  7. Barotropic governor in GFG • James and Gray’ 1986

  8. Zonal flow generation: the local turbulence view. • CHM becomes 2D Euler equation in the limit β→0, kρ→∞. Hence expect similarities to 2D turbulence. • Inverse energy cascade and direct cascade of potential enstrophy (FjØrtoft’53 argument). • Inverse cascade leads to energy condensation at large scales. • These are round(ish) vortices in Euler.

  9. Ubiquitous features in Drift/Rossby turbulence • Condensation into zonal jets in presence of β.

  10. Rhines scale crossover • Nonlinear=linear → Rhines scale. • “Lazy 8” separates vortex-dominated and wave-dominated scales (Rhines’75, Valis & Maltrud’93, Holloway’84) • Outside of lazy-8: Kraichnan’s isotropic inverse cascade. • Inside lazy-8 the cascade is anisotropic and dominated by triad wave resonances.

  11. Weakly nonlinear drift waves with random phases→ wave kinetic equation (Longuet-Higgens &Gill, 1967) Resonant three-wave interactions.

  12. Anisotropic cascades in drift turbulence • CHM has a third invariant (Balk, SN, Zakharov, 1990). • 3 cascades cannot be isotropic. • Potential enstrophy Q and the additional invariant Φforce energy E to the ZF scales. • No dissipation at ZF → growth of intense ZF → breakdown of local cascades. • Nonlocal direct interaction of the instability-range scales with ZF.

  13. Cartoon of nonlocal interaction • Eddy scale L decreases via shearing by ZF • Potential enstrophy Z is conserved. • => Eddy energy E =Z L2 is decreasing • Total E is conserved, => E is transferred from the eddy to ZF • Wrong! Both smaller and larger L’s are produced. The energy of the eddy is unchanged. (Kraichnan 1976). Victor P. Starr,Physics of Negative Viscosity Phenomena (McGraw Hill Book Co., New York 1968).

  14. Small-scale energy conservation • Energy in SS eddies is conserved if they are initially isotropic(Kraichnan 1976) • 1. Dissipation: ellipse cannot get too thin. • 2. Nonisotropic eddies: Modulational Instability (Lorenz’72, Gill’74, Manin, Nazarenko, 1994; Manfroi, Young, 1999; Smolyakov et al, 2000) • 3. Breaking of the scale separation due to inverse cascade

  15. Nonlocal 2D turbulence • Condensate forms – interaction of scales becomes nonlocal (Smith & Yakhot’93, Maltrud &Valis’93, Borue’94, Laval, SN & Dubrulle’99). • Small-scale spectrum changes to E~s-1ε k-1. (Kraichnan 1974, SN & Laval 2000; Connaugton et al 2007). Nazarenko & Laval 2000 Connaugton et al 2007

  16. Condensate coupled with turbulence • Instability forcing: ε(t) ~ γ(kf) E(kf) kf • Spectrum of small-scale turbulence: E(kf) ~ s-1ε kf-1 • Condensate energy: Ec ~ Vc2/2 ~ s2L2 ~ ∫ε(t) dt, • 1,2 => (i) E(kf) =0, - suppression of turbulence by jets; (ii) s ~ γ(kf) – saturation of the jets. 2D turbulence governor

  17. Feedback loop in 2D turbulence • Instability generates small-scale turbulence. • Inverse cascade leads to energy condensation (into jets in presence of beta). • Jets kill small-scale turbulence and saturate. • LH transition: this is why ITER must work. • Barotropic governor and other GFD mechanisms.

  18. Modulational Instability Manin, Nazarenko, 1994; Manfroi, Young, 1999; Smolyakov et al, 2000;Ongoing numerics: Connaughton, Nadiga, SN, Quinn. • Unstable if 3ky2 < kx2 +ρ-2

  19. Nonlinear development of MI:narrow zonal jets • Formation of intense narrow Zonal jets. • Transport/mixing Barriers. Analog of LH transition in fusion plasmas. • Secondary instability preferentially breaks westward jets (consistent with linear condition β-uyy <0 ?). • Irregular multiple jets with westward preference • Rhines spectrum: E ~ β2 k-5. Chekhlov et al’95.

  20. Evolution in the k-space • Energy of WP is partially transferred to ZF and partially dissipated at large k’s. • 2 regimes: random walk/diffusion of WP in the k-space (Balk, Nazarenko, Zakharov, 1990), • Coherent wave – modulational instability (Manin, Nazarenko, 1994, Smolyakov et at, 2000).

  21. Fast mode: modulational instability of a coherent drift wave. • Two component description Ψ = ΨL +ΨS. • Small-scale Rossby wave sheared by large-scale ZF. • Large-scale ZF pumped by RW via the ponderomotive force.

  22. Evolution of nonlocal drift turbulence:retain only interaction with small k’s and Taylor-expand the integrand of the wave-collision integral; integrate. • Diffusion along curves Ωk = ωk –βkx =conts. • S ~ZF intensity

  23. Drift-Wave instabilities • Maximum on the kx-axis at kρ ~ 1. • γ=0 line crosses k=0 point. Different ways to access the stored free energy: Resistive instability, ITG, ETG.

  24. Initial evolution • Solve the eigenvalue problem at each curve. • Max eigenvalue <0 → DW on this curve decay. • Max eigenvalue >0 → DW on this curve grow. • Growing curves pass through the instability scales

  25. ZF growth • DW pass energy from the growing curves to ZF. • ZF accelerates DW transfer to the dissipation scales via the increased diffusion coefficient.

  26. ZF growth • Hence the growing region shrink. • DW-ZF loop closed!

  27. Steady state • Saturated ZF. • Jet spectrum on a k-curve passing through the maximum of instability. • Suppressed intermediate scales (Dimits shift). • Balanced/correlated DW and ZF • (Shats experiment).

  28. Shats experiment • Suppression of inermediate scales by ZF • Scale separation • Nonlocal turbulence

  29. Shats experiment • Instability scales are strongly correlated with ZF scales • Nonlocal scale interaction

  30. Saturation of zonal flow • Different expressions for random 3-wave (low γ) and coherent (high γ) regimes • Intermediate range with Uzf ~ V*. • Only weak ZF damping dependence (important γ is at ρk~1). • No oscillatory behaviour. ZF cannot fall below the crit value because it’d be immediately pumped due to renewed instability.

  31. Summary • Self-regulating DW-ZF system. • Drift turbulence creates ZF. • ZF kills drift turbulence and switches the forcing off (cf Dimits shift). • For large grad T small scales reappear because ZF gets KH unstable. • Predictions for the saturated ZF, scale separation, jet-like spectrum of drift turbulence. • Experimental evidence in Heliac. Tokamaks?

  32. Breakdown of local cascades • Kolmogorov cascade spectra (KS) nk ~kxνx kyvy. • Exact solutions of WKE … if local. • Locality corresponds to convergence in WKE integral. • For drift turbulence KS obtained by Monin Piterbarg 1987. • All Kolmogorov spectra of drift turbulence are proven to be nonlocal (Balk, Nazarenko, 1989). • Drift turbulence must be nonlocal, - direct interaction with ZF scales

  33. Coupled large-scale & small-scale motions (Dyachenko, Nazarenko, Zakharov, 1992)

  34. Shear flow geometry

  35. North-Pacific zonal jets at 1000 m depth as seen in 58-year simulation with ECMWF climotological forcing (Nakano and Hasumi, 2005)

  36. Co-authors and relevant publications • Kolmogorov Weakly Turbulent Spectra of Some Types of Drift Waves in Plasma(A.B. Mikhailovskii, S.V. Nazarenko, S.V. Novakovskii, A.P. Churikov and O.G. Onishenko) Phys.Lett.A133 (1988) 407-409. • Kinetic Mechanisms of Excitation of Drift-Ballooning Modes in Tokamaks(A.B. Mikhailovskii, S.V. Nazarenko and A.P. Churikov) Soviet Journal of Plasma Physics 15 (1989) 33-38. • Nonlocal Drift Wave Turbulence (A.M.Balk, V.E.Zakharov and S.V. Nazarenko) Sov.Phys.-JETP 71 (1990) 249-260. • On the Nonlocal Turbulence of Drift Type Waves (A.M.Balk, S.V. Nazarenko and V.E.Zakharov) Phys.Lett.A146 (1990) 217-221. • On the Physical Realizability of Anisotropic Kolmogorov Spectra of Weak Turbulence(A.M.Balk and S.V. Nazarenko) Sov.Phys.-JETP 70 (1990) 1031-1041. • A New Invariant for Drift Turbulence(A.M.Balk, S.V. Nazarenko and V.E. Zakharov) Phys.Lett.A 152 (1991) 276-280. • On the Nonlocal Interaction with Zonal Flows in Turbulence of Drift and Rossby Waves(S.V. Nazarenko) Sov.Phys.-JETP, Letters, June 25, 1991, p.604-607. • Wave-Vortex Dynamics in Drift and beta-plane Turbulence(A.I. Dyachenko, S.V. Nazarenko and V.E. Zakharov) Phys,Lett.A165 (1992) 330-334. • Nonlinear interaction of small-scale Rossby waves with an intense large-scale zonal flow.(D.Yu. Manin and S.V. Nazarenko) Phys. Fluids. A6 (1994) 1158-1167.

  37. Ubiquitous features in Drift/Rossby turbulence • Drift Wave turbulence generates zonal flows • Zonal flows suppress waves • Hence transport barriers, Low-to-High confinement transition

  38. Drift wave – zonal flow turbulence paradigm • Local cascade is replaced by nonlocal (direct) interaction of the DW instability scales with ZF.

  39. Zonostrophy invariant • Extra quadratic invariant of CHM (Balk, Nazarenko, Zakharov, 1991). • Conserved by triad interactions.

  40. Zonal flow formation • At high k’s it is essentially Kraichnan’s isotropic inverse cascade. • Anisotropy only occurs when Rhines scale is reached. • Weak/wave turbulence theory inside lazy-8: Triad wave resonances. Typical numerical result (from Naulin 2002)

  41. Plan Dual-cascade behavior. Condensation into zonal jets: Zonostrophy invariant, modulational instability, Rhines spectrum. Transition to nonlocal interaction: Suppression of turbulence by zonal jets, Reduced turbulence transport, LH transition.

More Related