1 / 14

ISO Rules for Intermittent Generation

ISO Rules for Intermittent Generation. By Todd Ryan The RenewElec Workshop Oct 21 st 2010. Why rules for Intermittent Generation ?. Renewable generation is different than traditional generation in its variability and limited ability to be dispatched

thom
Download Presentation

ISO Rules for Intermittent Generation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ISO Rules for Intermittent Generation By Todd Ryan The RenewElec Workshop Oct 21st 2010

  2. Why rules for Intermittent Generation? • Renewable generation is different than traditional generation in its variability and limited ability to be dispatched • This creates issues in the operation and reliability of the markets • Rules need to be created to correct theses issues without unnecessarily discriminating against or towards a given technology • Making rules for intermittent generation allows the market to: • Accurately model resources to ensure reliable operation, dispatch, and pricing • Level the playing field when market rules unduly discriminate against types of technologies

  3. Intermittent Specific Rules • ISOs must first define an asset category: • Examples: Intermittent Generation, Intermittent Power, Variable Energy Resources • Intermittent-specific rules exist in all areas of of the rules governing the operation of the markets • Interconnection • Energy Market • Ancillary Services Market • Capacity Market

  4. Interconnection: Forecasting & Telemetry • Difference: • Intermittent generation is inherently variable • Scheduling intermittent generation solely based on economics would lead to non-optimal scheduling • Rule change: • Forecasting: Required to directly or indirectly subscribe to a forecasting service • Telemetry: Required to have sufficient metrological telemetry to provide to the forecasting service

  5. Interconnect: LVRT • Difference: • Wind turbine’s dynamic response different than traditional generation’s response to line voltage drops • Can lead to cascading reliability issues when unregulated • Rules: • Wind plants need to stay online for 9 cycles during a line voltage fault • Must maintain a power factor between 0.95 leading and lagging

  6. Energy Market: Scheduling • Difference: • intermittent generation can are less ‘schedulable’ than traditional generation • Rule: • Intermittent resources can only be economically scheduled up to their forecasted value • This should limit them amount of time when out-of-merit generation is needed

  7. Energy Market: Dispatch • Difference: • Intermittent generation can only be dispatched down • Not often viewed as desirable because of wasted renewable and economic energy • Rules: • Not often dispatched; sometimes defined as ‘undispatchable’. • One common reason to be dispatched down is a transmission constraint (a.k.a., “bottled”)

  8. Energy Market: Settlements • Difference: • Intermittent generation is not as in control of its output than traditional generation • Less likely to be able to game the energy market and more likely to be undeservedly hit by over-production/under-production charges • Rules • Some ISOs have excluded intermittent generation from their excessive/deficient energy charges

  9. Ancillary Services • Difference: • Ancillary services can only be scheduled on a dispatchable resource • Intermittent generation is not viewed as dispatchable • Rules • Currently ISO’s do not allow Intermittent resources to provide any of the ancillary services • Could intermittent resources? • Given more accurate persistence forecasting • Given a 5-minute energy and ancillary services markets

  10. Capacity Market: Offer Amount • Difference: • Intermittent generation does not have control of the of the delivery of capacity on peak days • The choice of how much to offer into the capacity market becomes more of a gamble for both the provider and consumer • Rules: • Some ISO’s limit the amount of capacity an intermittent generation provider can offer to a small fraction of their nameplate value

  11. Capacity Market: DA Requirement • Difference: • Traditional generation must offer their auctioned capacity into the Day-Ahead market • This guarantees the price certainty the Capacity market aims to provide • Renewable generation is forced to be scheduled to their forecast – can conflict with a capacity obligation • Rules: • Intermittent generation is excluded from the DA offer requirement

  12. Capacity Market: Penalties • No Difference: Undelivered capacity leads to penalties and potential loss of injection rights • Can be a severe disincentive for intermittent generation to participate in the capacity market • In areas that don’t limit the offer amount of intermittent generation, this penalty does so in practice

  13. Conclusions • Technology-specific rules are only used when absolutely necessary • Rules based on asset-class are more common • Renewable generation is often grouped in as intermittent generation • Rules specific to intermittent generation exist in all aspects of the markets • Intermittent specific rules will need to be reassessed as renewable penetration increases

  14. Questions? Todd Ryan Doctoral Student Engineering and Public Policy Carnegie Mellon University toddryan@andrew.cmu.edu

More Related