1 / 11

Problem solving with inspection results Marcel Stigter Policy Advisor DCMR

Problem solving with inspection results Marcel Stigter Policy Advisor DCMR. Inspection results. Storage of hazardous chemicals on a non resistant floor Air pollution: emission of 75 mg/m3 sulphur dioxide instead of 50 mg/m3 The abstraction of ground water was 40% more than licit.

Download Presentation

Problem solving with inspection results Marcel Stigter Policy Advisor DCMR

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Problem solving with inspection resultsMarcel StigterPolicy AdvisorDCMR

  2. Inspection results • Storage of hazardous chemicals on a non resistant floor • Air pollution: emission of 75 mg/m3 sulphur dioxide instead of 50 mg/m3 • The abstraction of ground water was 40% more than licit

  3. Oppressive enforcement Objective • A tool for finding and fining violations

  4. Oppressive enforcement • Reaction authorities • fining the violations • Reaction companies • Keep on violating until the costs of fines will be higher than the profits of violating or • The economic situation of the company is too bad to invest in the necessary measures or • Pay the fine and stop violating

  5. Oppressive enforcement • Results • continued environmental problems • possible soil pollution • air pollution with sulphur dioxide • dehydration of nature/soil and/or • a company with a bad economic performance • no improvement of environmental performance • unemployment and/or • solved violations and a minimum environmental performance

  6. Oppressive enforcement Objective • Finding violations and improvements and solving them in cooperation with the company • Use high fining as a pressure instrument

  7. Cooperative enforcement Reaction authorities and companies A cooperative attitude to solve the violations and discuss improvements of the environmental performance

  8. Cooperative enforcement Results • Solved violations within an approved timepath • Priority sequence in solving • Implementation of investments in balance with the economic performance of the company • Good relation between authorities and company

  9. Skills to make cooperative enforcement succesfull • Good knowledge of alternative technical solutions • Communication and negotiation skills • Knowledge of economic performances and possibilities

  10. Exercise • Prepare and execute a meeting between authorities and company on the inspection results • The meeting must result in an approved agreement with implementation time path

  11. Groups Groups of 6 persons • 1 chairman • 1 secretary • 2 persons acting as company representatives • 2 persons acting as authority representatives

More Related