1 / 21

Undergraduate Computer Engineering Program

Undergraduate Computer Engineering Program. ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT 2008-2009. Program Objectives LISTING OF OBJECTIVES. ENGR SYSTEM DESIGN. CONTEMPORARY ISSUES. COMMUNICATION. PROBLEM SOLVING. WORK/GRAD SCHOOL. Program Objectives CONSTITUENTS INVOLVED.

thora
Download Presentation

Undergraduate Computer Engineering Program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Undergraduate Computer Engineering Program ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT 2008-2009

  2. Program ObjectivesLISTING OF OBJECTIVES ENGR SYSTEM DESIGN CONTEMPORARY ISSUES COMMUNICATION PROBLEM SOLVING WORK/GRAD SCHOOL

  3. Program Objectives CONSTITUENTS INVOLVED

  4. Program Objectives PROGRAM OUTCOME SUPPORT OF OBJECTIVES 2008-2009 Results COLOR KEY: Data Not Available Met Marginally Met Not Met

  5. Program Objectives SUPPORTING SURVEYS • Surveys used for assessing Program Objectives: • IAB / Employer Survey • Employer Survey • Alumni/Alumnae Survey

  6. Program Objectives IAB/EMPLOYER SURVEYS 2008-2009 Results IAB and Employer Survey Support of the Program Objectives RUBRICS: 3 or higher is benchmark of support

  7. PRELIMINARY RESULTS Reported at time of the ABET Visit Program Objectives EMPLOYER SURVEYS 2008-2009 Results Cooperative Education –Performance Evaluation vs. Program Outcomes RUBRICS: 75% of responses are either 1 or 2 or S

  8. PRELIMINARY RESULTS as reported in ABET self study Program Objectives ALUMNI/NAE SURVEY 2008-2009 Results Alumni/nae Survey Support of the Program Outcomes - Rating of Extent Enhanced By UB Experience RUBRICS: 3 or higher is benchmark of success

  9. FINAL RESULTS Program Objectives ALUMNI/NAE SURVEY 2008-2009 Results Alumni/nae Survey Support of the Program Outcomes - Rating of Extent Enhanced By UB Experience RUBRICS: 3 or higher is benchmark of success

  10. Program Improvements2008-2009 Objectives Review 2008-2009 • Program Improvements: • New improved website component • Online Survey Tool • Introduction of Course Feedback Forms • Planned Improvements • IAB Reconstitution • Strengthen our relations with alumni • UB Undergraduate Alumni group page in Facebook • Newsletter Distribution continues

  11. Program OutcomesLISTING OF OUTCOMES FUNDAMENTALS DESIGN PROBLEM SOLVING TECHNIQUES/SKILLS TEAMWORK ENGR ECON / PLANNING ETHICS / PROFESSION EXPERIMENT / RESULTS COMMUNICATION DIVERSITY & LLL

  12. Program OutcomesCONSTITUENTS INVOLVED

  13. Program OutcomesOUTCOMES ASSESSMENT TABLE 2008-2009 Results KEY: B for Beginners, D for Developing P for Proficient. COLOR KEY: Data Not Available Met Marginally Met Not Met

  14. Course Reports’ Feedback2008-2009 Assessment Cycle 2008-2009 Results • Each course report • Reported on previous course specific recommendations. • Included recommendations for future course offerings • Broader impact recommendations: • CPE 387 – Embedded Systems • “It was noticed that some students do not register CpE 387 directly after finishing the microprocessors course CpE 286. There might be sometimes a difference of two or three semesters. It is recommended that students take CpE 387 directly after they finish CpE 286.” • CS 102 – Intro to Computing II (2007-2008) • In response to the 2007-2008 recommendation, the matter was discussed in the software thread committee and the following action taken: • “Proving algorithmic correctness” was rejected as a topic in CS102 for three main reasons: • It allowed more coverage to sorting and complexity analysis • It allowed more focus on the necessary OO and Java-language-specific topics (this is also the first semester this course is being taught using Java vs. C++ which was the language of instruction earlier. • It was better-suited for the CS follow-on course, CS329, Introduction to Analysis of Algorithms. Time constraints simply too great to over proving techniques and applications to algorithms.

  15. Program Outcomes SUPPORTING SURVEYS • Surveys used for assessing Program Outcomes: • IAB / Employer Survey • Coop Performance Evaluations • Senior Exit Survey

  16. Program Outcomes IAB/EMPLOYER SURVEY 2008-2009 Results IAB and Employer Survey Support of the Program Outcomes RUBRICS: 3 or higher is benchmark of support

  17. Program Outcomes COOP PERFORMANCE EVALS 2008-2009 Results Cooperative Education –Performance Evaluation vs. Program Outcomes RUBRICS: 75% of responses are either 1 or 2 or S

  18. Program Outcomes SENIOR EXIT SURVEY 2008-2009 Results Senior Exit Survey Support of the Program Outcomes - Rating of Extent Enhanced By UB Experience RUBRICS: 3 or higher is benchmark of success

  19. Program Improvements2008-2009 Outcomes Review 2008-2009 Results • Curricular Changes: • Introductory Programming language change. • Individual courses followed up on previous recommendations. • Process Improvements • New improved website component. • Online survey portal • Introduction of course feedback form.

  20. Program OutcomesLISTING OF ABET CRITERION 3 OUTCOMES

  21. Program OutcomesMAPPING TO ABET CRITERION 3 2008-2009 Results COLOR KEY: Data Not Available Met Marginally Met Not Met

More Related