130 likes | 153 Views
Explore recent legal developments safeguarding volunteers and good Samaritans, including exemptions from liability under the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) and considerations for organizations. Learn the criteria for protection and implications for vicarious liability.
E N D
Protecting volunteers– a review of recent legislative developments. Michael EburnSchool of LawUniversity of New England
Volunteers • Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW). • ‘Good Samaritans’ (Division 8). • Members of community organisations (Division 9). Michael EburnUni of New England
Good Samaritans- Ipp Review …the Panel is not aware, from its researches or from submissions received by it, of any Australian case in which a good Samaritan (a person who gives assistance in an emergency) has been sued by a person claiming that the actions of the good Samaritan were negligent. Nor are we aware of any insurance-related difficulties in this area. Michael EburnUni of New England
Premier’s 2nd Reading Speech The bill will also protect the good faith actions of good Samaritans who come to the assistance of a person in danger. This will mean no liability for voluntary rescue organisations, such as surf life saving clubs, if a person is injured in the course of or in connection with a rescue. Individual volunteers will also be protected from law suits where their actions were done in good faith. It is not intended to alter the potential liability of a community organisation by providing the individual members with immunity. Michael EburnUni of New England
Premier’s 2nd Reading Speech The bill will also protect the good faith actions of good Samaritans who come to the assistance of a person in danger. This will mean no liability for voluntary rescue organisations, such as surf life saving clubs, if a person is injured in the course of or in connection with a rescue. Individual volunteers will also be protected from law suits where their actions were done in good faith. It is not intended to alter the potential liability of a community organisation by providing the individual members with immunity. Michael EburnUni of New England
For protection:- • There must be ‘an emergency’; • The Good Samaritan must be ‘assisting a person who is apparently injured or at risk of being injured’; • The Good Samaritan must be acting in good faith; and • Without expectation of payment or other reward. Michael EburnUni of New England
Other issues • Duty to treat. • Vicarious Liability. Michael EburnUni of New England
Volunteers (Division 9) • Ipp Review • The Panel is not aware of any significant volume of negligence claims against volunteers in relation to voluntary work, or that people are being discouraged from doing voluntary work by the fear of incurring negligence liability. The Panel has decided to make no recommendation to provide volunteers as such with protection against negligence liability. Michael EburnUni of New England
Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) A volunteer does not incur any personal civil liability in respect of any act or omission done or made by the volunteer in good faith when doing community work: (a) organised by a community organisation, or (b) as an office holder of a community organisation. Michael EburnUni of New England
Protection does not apply if: • The volunteer is • engaged in criminal activities; • Intoxicated; or • acting outside the scope of his or her duties or contrary to instructions. • OR if the risk • is one that the organization was required to be insured against; or • arises out of a motor vehicle accident. Michael EburnUni of New England
Vicarious liability • Are organisations vicarious liable for their volunteers? • Non-delegable duty of care? Michael EburnUni of New England
Ad hoc reforms Ipp Review ‘Principle-based reform favours consistency and uniformity and requires special provisions for particular categories of cases to be positively argued-for and justified. This is the approach to reform that the Panel has adopted in conducting the review and making its proposals and recommendations.’ Michael EburnUni of New England
Conclusion • Thank you for your attention. Michael EburnUni of New England