1 / 13

Amit M Schejter Penn State and Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Noam Tirosh

“What is wrong cannot be made right ”*? – Why has media reform been sidelined in the debate over “social justice” in Israel. Amit M Schejter Penn State and Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Noam Tirosh Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. *Ecclesiastes 1:15. The summer of 2011.

thu
Download Presentation

Amit M Schejter Penn State and Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Noam Tirosh

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. “What is wrong cannot be made right”*? – Why has media reform been sidelined in the debate over “social justice” in Israel Amit M Schejter Penn State and Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Noam Tirosh Ben-Gurion University of the Negev *Ecclesiastes 1:15

  2. The summer of 2011

  3. Media system in transition • Magazines, book publishing, pay TV and online news portals demonstrate healthy competition • concentration in the newspapers and broadcast television markets seems to be declining • contemporary digital media is formulating into a vertically integrated, highly concentrated distribution system “the hegemony of old existing power centers is reproduced” (Caspi, 2011)

  4. Highly controlled audiovisual sector • 85 percent of Israelis with above-average income can access the Internet from home; only 55 percent of those with below-average income can do the same(Dror & Gershon, 2012) • DD predictors: education, income, age, Jewish ethnic origin (Mizrachi, 2005) Digital divide persists

  5. July 14, 2011: The people take to the street

  6. The study

  7. Has the need for media reform been presented as an issue in the social protest of 2011 and its aftermath? • If so, how? And if not, why?

  8. Four policy-related by products of the social protest were studieג • The official government policy paper • The “alternative” protesters’policy report • The protesters’ “media initiatives” • The platforms of the political parties in the 2013 elections

  9. The “official committee” was a “technological utopianist” and utilized “social media” to communicate with the public. • ““The new Israelis demand that their voices are heard, not as a one-time act during a demonstration, but in a structured and routine manner in the new “agora.” • Recommendations: None Findings

  10. The “alternative committee” calls for “services to citizens.” No details, no discussion of the ills of the media/ICT system • The protesters stick to “alternative media” production. No activity created to propose media reform. • The parties discussed lowering mobile phones prices, using media more efficiently for external propaganda, media bias. Recommendations: None Findings

  11. Why?

  12. The neo-liberal takeover of the discourse • The protest movement as middle class • The inability to “see through” the media as a system, when using it as a tool • The disbelief in structural change

  13. Thank you

More Related