1 / 15

MENU FOR JUSTICE

MENU FOR JUSTICE. QUALITY PLAN (WP 5) WP Leader: Daniela Cavallini (Bologna University) Task Force: Sandra Scicluna, Fabian Wittreck, Boguslaw Banaszak. Quality Plan.

thuyet
Download Presentation

MENU FOR JUSTICE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MENU FOR JUSTICE QUALITY PLAN (WP 5) WP Leader: Daniela Cavallini (Bologna University) Task Force: Sandra Scicluna, Fabian Wittreck, Boguslaw Banaszak

  2. Quality Plan • The objective of the Quality Plan is to ensure the correct and fruitful development of MFJ project, by constantly monitoring the project lifecycle • The ultimate objective of the Quality Plan is to ensure the achievement of high quality project results, according to the project planning • A special Task Force has been formed which will interact with other governing bodies

  3. In particular, specific purposes of Quality Plan are: • To fix recommendations to guarantee quality development • To monitor project development, with particular regard to deadlines and tasks distribution • To support continuous improvement of methods and processes • To guarantee the correct fulfilment of project tasks vs. project aims • To assess the outputs and of the added value of the project • To evaluate the dissemination of project activities/ results • To assess partners satisfaction about project outputs and results • To point out strengths and weakness of the projects

  4. The quality matrix • The Quality approach will consider 3 dimensions: The quality of the MFJ processes The quality of the MFJ activities The quality of the MFJ products • Process deals with general organisation and management of the project (governance, budgeting, communication policy, management) • Activities consist in meetings, dissemination and exploitation • Products concern MFJ intermediate and final outcomes (web site, reports, curriculum studiorum in judicial studies) and the project as a whole Two sections are considered: Quality planning and Quality evaluation

  5. Quality planning: MFJ Processes Governance: • the governance structure is shown in WP 1 • It aims at assuring: fairness and effectiveness of MFJ development, fruitful coordination of project activities, participation of the partners Communication policy: • it reflects the governance structure • Task force members should relate to TF coordinators • TF coordinators are pivotal figures: they should relate among them, to WP coordinators and to the Steering committee • Partners from Countries with more than one member should coordinate among them • The Board of Director should relate to EACEA (European Commission) • budgeting questions should be addressed to the project manager Management/budgeting: • Financial resources are distributed on the basis of the activities requested to each partner and should be discussed in the plenary meetings • The project manager will take care of budgeting (see WP 1)

  6. Quality planning: MFJ Activities Meetings (plenary and task force meetings): • The agenda and related documents (to be distributed to participants) should circulate among the partners at least one week before the meeting • ppt presentations (to be shown at the meeting) should be sent to the meeting organiser at least three days before the event • Evaluation questionnaires should be filled in by participants after the meeting • Meeting minutes should be posted on the website as soon as possible after the meeting (by 10-15 days) Dissemination actions: • promotional materials should be user-friendly and relevant for the project • Each partners should take care of dissemination activities, relating to the Dissemination Task Force indications (WP 7) Exploitation: • Each partners should take care of exploitation of MFJ results, according to the indications that will be given in WP 6

  7. Quality planning: MFJ Products Website: • The website structure should be clear and user-friendly • The website should contain clear information about the relevant activities of MFJ project • It should consist of a public area and a restricted area (reserved to MFJ partners) • It should serve both as a dissemination tool and as a repository Reports: • They should be clear and coherent to their purpose • They should be sent to the respective WP coordinator at least one month before the deadline, in order to be discussed or revised by other partners • They should be finally posted on the website Curriculum studiorum: • it should fit the needs of training assessed during the project development • It should have scientific soundness and relevance Project as a whole: • achieved results should correspond to expected results

  8. Quality evaluation: MFJ processes

  9. Quality Evaluation: MFJ activities

  10. Quality Evaluation: MFJ products

  11. Evaluation tools and timing MFJ evaluation methodology is based on: • Periodic reviews: they will focus on the overall functioning of project management, trans-national partnership, communication within the project, partners’ benefits from participation. They will be carried out after the project meetings and before the I and II Intermediate Quality Reports. They will be conducted through surveys • Formativeevaluations: it will focus on the development and implementation of project outputs. They will be carried out by collecting systematic, structured feedback from potential and actual stakeholders, users, experts and professionals, through seminars, surveys, peer review • Overallevaluation: it will be carried out towards the end of the project in order to assess if the project objectives had been achieved and collect suggestions for future actions. It will be carried out through seminars, survey, interviews

  12. Quality evaluation tools and timing

  13. Quality evaluation tools and timing

  14. To sum up… • July 2010 and July 2011: a general survey (Annex 1) will be carried out involving all partners and the Steering committee about: Governance, Communication policy, Management/Budgeting, Website, Project Outcomes • A specific survey (Annex 2) will be delivered at the end of each meeting (both Plenary and Task force meetings) about the quality of the meeting itself • Feb 2011 and July 2012 (at about halfway and at the end of the project): Dissemination Task Force will refer about dissemination results with respect to number of quotations on google, number of people and organisations reached, seminars organised, articles published on MFJ project/activities

  15. Beginning of 2011: Peer review among the Task Forces on proposals of Curriculum studiorum • 2011: Seminars to external actors on proposals of Curriculum studiorum • June 2012 (at halfway through WP 6 on exploitation): evaluation on exploitation activities • 2011 and 2012, evaluation on the provided reports (after the deadlines for their delivery) • A final survey (Annex 1) will be carried out involving all partners and the Steering committee just before the end of the project (July 2012), to evaluate the overall development of the project (the Annexes are posted on the intranet website)

More Related