120 likes | 198 Views
An alternative view. ”European unemployment : the evolution of facts and ideas ” Olivier Blanchard Economic Policy 21 (45):5-59. Placing theory in context. Policy advice. Policy advice. Balanced growth path: The ”warranted wage” gives natural rate of unemployment
E N D
An alternative view ”European unemployment: theevolutionof facts and ideas” Olivier Blanchard Economic Policy 21 (45):5-59
Placing theory in context Policy advice
Policy advice • Balanced growth path: The ”warranted wage” gives natural rate of unemployment • Follows technological progress • Falls (to maintain zero net profit for firms) if non-labor input prices rise • Three sources of shocks: • Oil prices (real price almost tripled from 1970-80) • Total factor productivity growth rates (more than halved) • Labour unrest • ”The increase in unemployment was explained by adverse shocks interacting with country-specific collective bargaining structures”
Policy advice • First half: Contractionary anti-inflationary policies gave (”temporarily”) increase in unemployment • Second half: Stable inflation buth higher unemployment, increased natural rate? • Theoretical explanations of persistence: • Capital accumulation – excessive wages -> lower employment -> lower profit rate (below user cost of capital) -> lower capital investments-> further decrease in employment. This mechanism is strengthened by contractionary policy, as nominal rigidity becomes more important to wages and real interest rates rise • Collective bargaining (insider outsider): Unemployed (especially long-term) less effective in exerting downward wage pressure than employed are in exerting upward pressure
Policy advice • European countries start diverging more • Still high in France, Spain, Italy • Falling in UK, Ireland, Beligium • Increasing in Germany • Still low in Austria, Norway, Portugal – with temporary upswings in Sweden and Denmark • Theory needed to account for differences: • Matching models led to new analysis of institutions, e.g.: • Employment protection reduces layoffs, strengthens workers->higher wages->longer unemployment, all in all: lower flows and higher duration, ambiguous effect on unemployment, but longer duration • Empirical work: • Differences in institutions seemed able to explain cross-country differences • Changes in institutions did not appear able to explain changes in unemployment • ”In panel data regressions of unemployment rates on institutions across 20 countries since 1960, and allowing for country and time dummies, none of the labour market institutions appeared significant”
Policy advice • 3 directions: • Other shocks, institutions, interactions • Example: More turbulent, globalized economy hits institutions better suited to the ”old world” • Closer look at institutions • France: Shocks believed to be temporary in 1970s led to higher unemployment insurance and better employment protection. Reversed in 80s, but in a new direction with establishment of dual labor market • ”One of the reasons why the shocks of the 1970s and 1980s have led to high unemployment in some European countries today is that they triggered a change in institutions which has been partly and poorly undone in these countries.” • Employment, capital, wages, interest rates • The theories discussed also have implications for a broader set of economic indicators