1 / 67

WASTE REDUCTION AND MINIMIZATION

WASTE REDUCTION AND MINIMIZATION. CONCEPT HAS SEVERAL COMMON NAMES. WASTE MINIMIZATION POLLUTION PREVENTION LOW - NON-WASTE TECHNOLOGIES CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES CLEAN PRODUCTS WASTE REDUCTION DESIGN FOR ENVIRONMENT. APPLICATIONS. NEW PROJECTS EXISTING PROCESSES.

thy
Download Presentation

WASTE REDUCTION AND MINIMIZATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WASTE REDUCTION AND MINIMIZATION

  2. CONCEPT HAS SEVERAL COMMON NAMES WASTE MINIMIZATION POLLUTION PREVENTION LOW - NON-WASTE TECHNOLOGIES CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES CLEAN PRODUCTS WASTE REDUCTION DESIGN FOR ENVIRONMENT

  3. APPLICATIONS NEW PROJECTS EXISTING PROCESSES

  4. DESIGN FOR ENVIRONMENT (DFE) CONCEPTS • ECONOMIC ADVANTAGES • SAVE MONEY • CREATE NEW MARKETS • PRODUCT PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTS • REGULATORY COMPLIANCE • REDUCE FUTURE LIABILITY RISKS • REDUCE TREATMENT COSTS • REDUCE WASTE & POLLUTION • IMPROVE COMPANY IMAGE

  5. INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGYDEFINITIONS • MULTI-DISCIPLINARY FIELD • CONSIDERS LINKAGES BETWEEN INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIC SYSTEMS AND NATURAL SYSTEMS • EVALUATES USES OF ENERGY, MATERIALS AND VARIOUS TECHNOLOGIES

  6. INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY GENERIC DEFINITION (BY ALLENBY)

  7. INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY GENERIC DEFINITION (BY ALLENBY – CONTINUED)

  8. INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY • EXAMPLES OF RESEARCH • IMPACT OF WATER USE ON DEVELOPMENT • ASPECTS OF HEAVY METALS USE IN AGRICULTURE • THE IMPACT OF MATERIALS ON INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY

  9. ISO (INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDS) 14000 -VOLUNTARY INTERNATIONAL STANDARD OBJECTIVE IS TO SET UP AN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (EMS) TO ADDRESS THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THEIR PROCESSES

  10. COMPONENTS WITHIN ISO 14000 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (14001,14002, 14004) ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITING (14010, 14011, 14012) EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE (14031) ENVIRONMENTAL LABELING (14020, 14021, 14022, 14023, 14024, 14025) LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT (14040, 14041,14042, 14043)

  11. OVERALL QUALITY IMPROVEMENT CONCEPT

  12. STANDARDS TO BE INCORPORATED IN THE EMS PERFORMANCE ARE MEASURED AGAINST THE OBJECTIVES SET BY THE ORGANIZATION

  13. CRITICAL COMPONENTS FOR EMS • EMS HAS A CORE SET OF PLANNING ACTIVITIES THAT ENSURES A FACILITY WILL: • IDENTIFY FACILITY OPERATIONS, PROCESSES, AND PRODUCTS THAT HAVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS • EVALUATE WHICH IMPACTS ARE SIGNIFICANT • SET OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS FOR REDUCING NEGATIVE IMPACTS • SELECT AND IMPLEMENT ACTIVITIES TO ACHIEVE IDENTIFIED TARGETS

  14. EMS OBJECTIVES • SYSTEMIC APPLICATION PROMOTES TOP-TO-BOTTOM INTEGRATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS FUNCTIONS, BY REQUIRING: • AN ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY DEFINED BY TOP MANAGEMENT • CONSIDERATION OF OPERATING CONDITIONS AND CONTROLS AND THEIR EFFECT UPON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS • SPECIFIC IDENTIFICATION OF NEEDED AUTHORITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR IMPLEMENTATION • PERIODIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW OF SYSTEM RESULTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE

  15. EMS OBJECTIVES • CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT IS DESIGNED TO CONTINUALLY IMPROVE SYSTEM AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE, THROUGH: • CREATION OF SPECIFIC TIMELINES, AUTHORITIES, AND DESIGNATED RESPONSIBILITIES FOR PLAN • EXECUTION AND ACTIVITY IMPLEMENTATION • PERIODIC COMPLIANCE AUDITS TO IDENTIFY COMPLIANCE PROCEDURE IMPROVEMENTS • PERIODIC EMS AUDITS TO ASSESS PROGRESS TOWARDS STATED GOALS AND IDENTIFY NEEDED SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS • MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT OF ACTIVITIES RELATED TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

  16. EMS OBJECTIVES • CONFIRMATION OF IMPACT EMS ACTIONS ARE VERIFIABLE, BECAUSE: • DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS ENSURE THAT BOTH CONFORMANCE WITH THE STANDARD AND EMS PERFORMANCE CAN BE AUDITED • THE ISO CERTIFICATION PROCESS SETS SPECIFIC STANDARDS AND PRACTICES FOR AUDITING BOTH CONFORMANCE WITH THE STANDARD AND PERFORMANCE OF THE EMS

  17. LEVELS OF DFE APPLICATION • LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS • CRADLE TO GRAVE -ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

  18. PRIMARY OPPORTUNITIES IN DFE • TYPICAL IMPACTS INVESTIGATED INCLUDE • AIR, WATER AND SOLID WASTES PRODUCED • HAZARD POTENTIAL OF WASTES AND PROCESSES • RENEWABLE RESOURCE UTILIZATION • ENERGY EFFICIENCY

  19. SIMPLER VERSION OF THE LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS TEMPLATE

  20. EXAMPLE OF LCA - PAPER OR PLASTIC • GIVEN: PAPER OR PLASTIC • WANTED: DETERMINE WHICH OF THESE TWO CONTAINERS HAS THE LEAST NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT. • (a) DETERMINE THE AMOUNT OF ENERGY REQUIRED AND THE QUANTITY OF AIR POLLUTION RELEASED FOR PRODUCTION OF 1000 LB PE SACKS AND THE NUMBER OF UNBLEACHED PAPER GROCERY SACKS THAT WILL HOLD THE SAME AMOUNT OF GROCERIES. • (b) PLOT THE ENERGY REQUIREMENTS AS A FUNCTION OF RECYCLE RATES FOR EACH MATERIAL.

  21. EXAMPLE OF LCA - PAPER OR PLASTIC • WANTED: (continued) • (c) SPECIFY THE RELATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THESE TWO PRODUCTS. • (d) COMPARE THE AMOUNT OF PETROLEUM REQUIRED TO PROVIDE 10% OF THE ENERGY FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF ONE PAPER SACK.

  22. EXAMPLE OF LCA - PAPER OR PLASTIC • BASIS: • (1) ASSUME 2.0 PE SACKS ARE USED TO HOLD THE SAME AMOUNT OF GROCERIES AS ONE PAPER SACK. • (2)TABLE 1-1 AIR EMISSIONS & ENERGY REQUIREMENTS FOR PAPER AND PLASTIC (PE) GROCERY SACKS • (3) TABLE 1-2 PROFILE OF ATMOSPHERIC EMISSIONS FOR GROCERY SACKS (EXCLUDING FINAL DISPOSAL)

  23. EXAMPLE OF LCA - PAPER OR PLASTIC TABLE 1-1 AIR EMISSIONS & ENERGY REQUIREMENTS

  24. EXAMPLE OF LCA - PAPER OR PLASTIC TABLE 1-2 -PROFILE OF ATMOSPHERIC EMISSIONS

  25. EXAMPLE OF LCA - PAPER OR PLASTIC • OTHER FACTORS • PE MATERIAL AND ENERGY REQUIREMENTS ARE SATISFIED USING A NON-RENEWABLE RESOURCE, OIL. • MOST OF THE ENERGY REQUIREMENTS FOR PAPER SACK PRODUCTION ARE MET USING WOOD WASTES. • ASSUME 0% RECYCLE OF PLASTIC SACKS AND 1.2 lb PETROLEUM REQUIRED TO MANUFACTURE 1 lb OF PE SACK • WHERE THE HEATING VALUE OF PETROLEUM IS 20,000 BTU/lb • 1000 LB OF PE YIELDS 60,800 PE SACKS

  26. EXAMPLE OF LCA - PAPER OR PLASTIC TABLE 1-3 SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES FOR LIFE CYCLES

  27. EXAMPLE OF LCA - PAPER OR PLASTIC • SOLUTION • A SIMILAR SET OF CALCULATIONS IS COMPLETED FOR THE ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTANT LEVELS AND FOR PE SACKS. • RESULTS ARE SHOWN IN THE FOLLOWING TABLES AND FIGURES.NERGY REQUIREMENTS AND EMISSION RATES - BASIS 1000 lb PE SACKS • USE DATA FROM TABLE 1-1. • AIR EMISSIONS FOR PAPER SACKS AT SPECIFIED RECYCLE FRACTION:

  28. EXAMPLE OF LCA - PAPER OR PLASTIC SOLUTION CALCULATION SUMMARY TABLE

  29. EXAMPLE OF LCA - PAPER OR PLASTIC SOLUTION

  30. EXAMPLE OF LCA - PAPER OR PLASTIC SOLUTION

  31. EXAMPLE OF LCA - PAPER OR PLASTIC SOLUTION

  32. EXAMPLE OF LCA - PAPER OR PLASTIC SOLUTION • RESULTS • (c) PE SACKS TEND TO GENERATE LOWER EMISSIONS AND REQUIRE LESS ENERGY THAN PAPER SACKS, • EXCEPT AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF RECYCLE. THE TYPES OF EMISSIONS ARE NOT THE SAME, WITH PE GENERATING HIGHER QUANTITIES OF HYDROCARBONS AND PAPER SACKS GENERATING MORE NOx AND MORE SO2. • THIS ANALYSIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY EMISSIONS FROM DISPOSAL EITHER IN LANDFILL OR INCINERATION TO COMPLETE THE LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS.

  33. EXAMPLE OF LCA - PAPER OR PLASTIC SOLUTION • RESULTS • (d) FROM THE STANDPOINT OF OIL CONSUMPTION, THE PAPER SACKS TEND TO REQUIRE LESS OIL DUE TO THE AVAILABILITY OF FUEL IN THE FORM OF WOOD WASTES. • NOTE: AS A OPTION, CONSIDER REUSABLE GROCERY SACKS • THESE ARE MADE FROM NYLON, JUTE, COTTON STRING, ETC. • MAY BE REUSED HUNDREDS OF TIMES • THESE REQUIRE ABOUT 10 - 20 TIMES THE ENERGY AND GENERATE 10 - 20 TIMES THE AIR POLLUTION AS PAPER OR PE SO MUST BE USED AT LEAST 20 TIMES TO HAVE A POSITIVE IMPACT.

  34. DFE TOOLS AND PROCEDURES • OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN THE MANUFACTURING PROCESSES • MATERIALS SUBSTITUTION • REDUCE QUANTITIES OF PROCESS WASTES BY WASTE SEGREGATION • REVISED CONTROL METHODS • REVISED PROCESSING METHODS • RECYCLING A MATERIAL RATHER THAN DISPOSAL

  35. MATERIALS SUBSTITUTION • REDUCE TOXICITY OF PROCESS COMPONENTS • POLAROID CHANGE OF DYE -1987 • REDUCED TOXICITY -REPLACED Cr(VI) COMPOUND • REDUCED PROCESS WASTES BY 80% • IMPROVED FILM PERFORMANCE • REDUCED ANNUAL DISPOSAL COSTS BY $1 MILLION (1987$)

  36. MATERIALS SUBSTITUTION • NAVY REPLACEMENT OF SOLVENT FOR PAINT REMOVAL FROM PLANES WITH PLASTIC BEADS FROM HIGH PRESSURE HOSES • ELIMINATES NEED TO USE METHYLENE CHLORIDE • ELIMINATES TOXIC WASTE AS BEADS ARE RECYCLED • COST SAVINGS ~$24,000 PER PLANE (1995$)

  37. REDUCE QUANTITIES OF PROCESS WASTES BY WASTE SEGREGATION GENERAL JUSTIFICATIONS

  38. REDUCE QUANTITIES OF PROCESS WASTES BY WASTE SEGREGATION ACME-UNITED CONCENTRATION OF NI SALTS IN PLATING SOLUTION USING REVERSE OSMOSIS

  39. REDUCE QUANTITIES OF PROCESS WASTES BY WASTE SEGREGATION • ACME-UNITED CONCENTRATION OF NI SALTS IN PLATING SOLUTION USING REVERSE OSMOSIS • CONCENTRATED NI SALT SOLUTION RECYCLED TO PLATING TANK • REDUCED QUANTITY OF SLUDGE PRODUCED BY 80% • REDUCED RAW MATERIALS COSTS BY 94% • SAVES AT LEAST $40,000/YEAR (1986$) FROM REDUCTION IN WASTE DISPOSAL COSTS AND RAW MATERIALS COSTS • CAPITAL COST FOR SYSTEM ~$62,000

  40. REDUCE QUANTITIES OF PROCESS WASTES BY WASTE SEGREGATION • SNAP-ON TOOLS RECYCLING A RINSEWATER STREAM USING ULTRAFILTRATION AND ION EXCHANGE • REMOVED LOW-LEVEL (<1%) ISOPROPYL AMINE CONTAMINANT FROM PAINT STREAM WITH ION EXCHANGE TO ALLOW RECYCLE OF PAINT TO PROCESS • REDUCED LOSSES OF PAINT BY 190,000 LB/YR • ANNUAL SAVINGS IN PAINT COSTS AND SEWER FEES OF $73,000 (1989$) • CAPITAL COST FOR PROJECT = $150,000

  41. REVISED CONTROL METHODS • CHEMICAL PLANT PROJECTS IN LITHUANIA • ADDITION OF CONDUCTIVITY/TDS METER TO BOILER PLANT BLOWDOWN • REDUCED SO2 AND NOX EMISSIONS BY 0.84 TON/YR • REDUCED FUEL OIL CONSUMPTION BY 30 TONS/YR • 7 MONTH PAYOUT

  42. REVISED CONTROL METHODS • CHEMICAL PLANT PROJECTS IN LITHUANIA • CHEMICAL PLANT PROJECTS IN LITHUANIA (1993) • pH METER ON A MONOAMMONIUM PHOSPHATE PROCESS • REDUCED AMMONIA TO AIR • FEWER PROCESS UPSETS • 2 MONTH PAYOUT

  43. REVISED PROCESSING METHODS • REVISED LIGHTING FOR AMERICAN EXPRESS OFFICES IN NEW YORK CITY • REPLACED 31,000 T12 LAMPS WITH 31,000 T8 LAMPS • REPLACED 17,000 MAGNETIC BALLASTS WITH ELECTRONIC BALLASTS • REPLACED 58 INCANDESCENT LAMPS WITH COMPACT FLUORESCENTS • REPLACED 239 MANUAL SWITCHES WITH OCCUPANCY SENSORS

  44. REVISED PROCESSING METHODS • REVISED LIGHTING FOR AMERICAN EXPRESS OFFICES IN NEW YORK CITY • TOTAL PROJECT COST: $710,000 • SAVINGS: INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN 38% (EXCLUDING REBATE) • TOTAL ANNUAL SAVINGS $280,000 • REBATES/GRANTS $450,000 • ENERGY SAVINGS: • KW REDUCTION: 519.9 • LIGHTING ELECTRICITY REDUCTION 47%

  45. REVISED PROCESSING METHODS • REVISED LIGHTING FOR AMERICAN EXPRESS OFFICES IN NEW YORK CITY • ANNUAL POLLUTION PREVENTED: • CO2 5,000,000 LBS • SO235,000 LBS • NOX 12,000 LBS

  46. REVISED PROCESSING METHODS • CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION TOMS RIVER PLANT REDUCES SAMPLING AND CHARGING SOLVENT EMISSIONS FROM KETTLES IN RESINS PRODUCTION • REVISED PROCESS TO CHARGE AND SAMPLE REACTION VESSEL • REDUCTION IN VOC EMISSIONS BY 50 TPY (90%) • COST = $10000 • SAVINGS = $50K/YR (1996$) • YIELD INCREASE OF 1 %

  47. RECYCLING • REFERS TO REUSE OF A MATERIAL RATHER THAN DISPOSAL • THE IDEAL MATERIAL FOR RECYCLING • HAS UNIFORM PROPERTIES • IS AVAILABLE AT A CONSTANT RATE • IS AVAILABLE IN A QUANTITY THAT JUSTIFIES THE NECESSARY CAPITAL EXPENDITURE • HAS LIMITED CONTAMINANTS • HAS FUEL VALUE AND CAN BE INCINERATED WITHOUT PRODUCING HAZARDOUS WASTES

  48. INTERNAL RECYCLING • PROCESSES THAT RECOVER AND REUSE A MATERIAL THAT DOES NOT CHANGE FORM IN THE PROCESS • PROCESS COOLING WATER SYSTEMS • PURPOSE OF SYSTEM IS TO PROVIDE COOLING TO A PROCESS USING RECYCLED WATER • WATER IS COOLED BY EVAPORATION INTO AIR • NORMAL CONCENTRATION LEVELS ARE 6 - 7 TIMES BEFORE REPLACEMENT

  49. PROCESS COOLING WATER SYSTEMS

  50. PROCESS COOLING WATER SYSTEMS • WATER TREATMENT PROCESSES -CHEMICAL • PREVENT CORROSION, SCALING, MICROBIOLOGICAL FOULING • IMPROVE HEAT TRANSFER

More Related