80 likes | 260 Views
Activation Policies and Programs: A Social Assistance Perspective. Kathy Lindert Sector Manager for Social Protection Europe and Central Asia October 2008. Active Inclusion. Active inclusion : Income support plus Link to labor market and better access to services
E N D
Activation Policies and Programs:A Social Assistance Perspective Kathy Lindert Sector Manager for Social Protection Europe and Central Asia October 2008
Active Inclusion • Active inclusion: • Income support plus • Link to labor market and better access to services • Mutual Obligations principle • Society invests more in helping beneficiaries respond in effective ways • Beneficiaries expected to respond and “do their part” • Objectives: • INCOME SUPPORT: Emphasis on supporting individuals to alleviate current situation (income support)…. and • JOB SUPPORT: On providing social and employment services to help them overcome obstacles to entering into paid work • WORK is at center of strategy to ensure that individuals in prime age are not excluded from mainstream society.
Activation is linked to the “Graduation Agenda” debate in Social Assistance • Concerns about: • Perverse incentives for adult labor • Beneficiary dependency on transfers • Need to empower beneficiaries as productive members of society • Evidence of adverse incentives on adult labor: • Mixed • Depends a lot on program design • Policy debate over promoting: • Graduation from poverty • Links to human capital, work (activation), social services • VERSUS: • Graduation from program • Time limits • Work requirements (workfare)
Activation/Graduation is Usually a “Second-Generation” Issue for Social Assistance Programs Source: Lindert and Vincensini (2008); Analysis of social policy in Brazil’s media
Two key policy choice areas in nexus between Activation and Social Assistance • Linking beneficiaries of social assistance to activation programs • Using SA benefits to promote incentives for employment • (More effective if have a good balance between these two)
Linking SA beneficiaries to Activation Programs • Some Challenges: • Inter-institutional, inter-governmental • Tailoring activation programs (e.g., training) to the meet the needs of the hard-core poor (hard-to-serve) • Changing “job” behaviors (life skills) • Ensuring sustainability in job placement, opportunities for this hard-to-serve population well beyond the intervention
Using SA benefits to promote incentives for employment (tools to preserve work effort) • Time limits for cash benefits • Work requirements (or work activity participation) for able-bodied adult beneficiaries • Avoiding excess “generosity” in benefits • Eg social assistance < unemployment insurance and the minimum pensions; • Graduate benefits reductions (for increases in earned incomes) • Set exit thresholds higher than entrance thresholds, use sliding scales for withdrawals, provide lump sum graduation benefits or employment bonuses, provide transitional childcare or transportation allowances, fund subsidized social insurance • Consider proxy means or asset tests rather than only income tests • Earned income tax credits • Link cash transfers to positive incentives: • Human capital linkages (CCTs) • Link transfers to elements that will improve earnings: education, job training or placement services, micro-finance, social support services
Benefit level in practiceResult of a trade-off • Given budget, determine benefit level and program coverage • Benefit level should be: • neither too high to generate dependency, • nor too low to lack impact 8