1 / 33

How specific should we be?

How specific should we be?. Louis Rogers. www.macmillanskillful.com /. Specificity Vs. Transferability. Current practice General academic v ocabulary Beyond individual words Practicalities The broader picture. Current practices. Current practices.

tia
Download Presentation

How specific should we be?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. How specific should we be? Louis Rogers

  2. www.macmillanskillful.com/

  3. Specificity Vs. Transferability • Current practice • General academic vocabulary • Beyond individual words • Practicalities • The broader picture

  4. Current practices

  5. Current practices • How similar are different genres and disciplines? • Academic writing - 15,559 Results • How do these style guides present academic writing? • Bennett’s survey

  6. Current practices • Barrass, R. Scientists must write: A guide to better writing for scientists, engineers and students. • Brown, R, B. Doing your dissertation in business and management: The reality of researching and writing. • Fabb, N and Durant, A. How to write essays and dissertations: A guide for English literature students. • Kneale, P. Study skills for geography students: A practical guide. • Northedge et al. The sciences good study guide. • Strong, S.I How to write law essays and exams.

  7. Current practices • General principles • Text structure • Grammatical issues • Lexical features • Other features

  8. Current practice • Large degree of consistency • Evidence, caution and restraint, incorporation of sources • Formal, technical, objective • Structure – IMRD / IDC • Impersonal

  9. General Academic Vocabulary

  10. General Academic Vocabulary • The Academic Word List (Coxhead) • 4 discipline areas • 3.5 million word corpus • 570 word families • West’s 1953 General Service List

  11. General Academic Vocabulary • 75% = 2000 most frequent words • 10-15% = academic vocabulary • 10-15% = specialist vocabulary

  12. General Academic Vocabulary Job Examine Quantitative Qualitative Omission Persuasion Classification Determine

  13. General Academic Vocabulary • Multi-meaning words • Volume Attribute • Is one core list possible? • Moving beyond individual words • General Service List + AWL • Address, control, means • Address-issue, control-group, by-means

  14. Beyond individual words

  15. Collocations • Hyland 2008 • Electronic Engineering • Biology • Business Studies • Applied linguistics • 4 word bundles • 50 most frequent • On the other hand, as well as the, in the case of, at the same time, the results of the • Half on one list only

  16. Collocations • Function of collocations • Research-orientated = location, procedure, quantification, description, topic At the same time, the purpose of, a wide range of, the size of the, the currency board system • Text-orientated = transition, results, structure, framing In addition to the, it was found that, in the next section, with the exception of

  17. Collocations • Participant-orientated = stance, engagement It is possible that, as can be seen

  18. Collocation • Sciences = research-orientated • Social sciences = text-orientated • 90% Vs. 80% and 9% Vs. 17% • Chunks not transferable • Functions are transferable • Relative weight of assessment type

  19. Collocation • Hyland and Tse (2007) • marketing strategy • learning strategy • coping strategy • Durrant (2009) • Life Sciences, Science and Engineering, Social-Psychological, Social-administrative, Arts and Humanities • 1000 two-word collocations across all 5 areas

  20. Collocation • Three quarters grammatical • Reporting pattern ‘verb + that’ • Argue, assumer, conclude, confirm, demonstrate, emphasize, hypothesize, imply, indicate, note, predict, reveal, show, speculate, suggest, suppose • Frequency and pattern combined • Transferability of use not investigated • Based on, associate with, note that, defined as, relationship between, effects on, indicate that

  21. In favour of specificity • Strong evidence for disciplinary differences • Broad or subtle? • Nation - theory is theory no matter what the discipline • Are grammatical collocations and functions more transferable? • Implications for institutions and teachers

  22. Practicalities • Time for research • Contact with academics • Time for materials development • Financial constraints

  23. Practicalities • Broad ESAP • Combined degrees • Accountancy with; Management, Divinity, Law, IT, Economics, Spanish, Biology, Broadcast media, Geology, Psychology, HR, Finance, Leadership Mandarin, Logistics, and Maths • EAP teacher knowledge

  24. Practicalities • Variability of specialist areas • Management and Business Consistent areas - Finance, Accounting, Statistics and Organisational Behaviour Differences – Economics, Marketing, Computing, Enterprise, Law, Foreign Languages • Challenge in defining genres

  25. The bigger picture • ‘An expert is one who knows more and more about less and less.’ Nicholas Murray Butler • Bachelors, Masters, PhD • The interdisciplinary nature of the Colleges as a major stimulus to teaching and learning

  26. The bigger picture • Highly flexible programme • Extensive choice of subjects • Acquire transferable skills • Highly flexible undergraduate learning environment • Cater for a variety of different student interests and career aspirations • Develops analytical, quantitative, computing, presentation and other transferable skills

  27. The bigger picture • Progression through years • Sandwich degrees • Placements • Knowledge economy

  28. Implications • Skills to deal with a wide range of texts • Purpose, audience, aims • Ability to identify patterns • Critically analyse these features • Mixed backgrounds, experiences, disciplines allows for better analysis

  29. Conclusion • Is there a core academic vocabulary? • Are the differences significant enough? • How specific can we be? • How specific should we be?

  30. www.macmillanskillful.com/

  31. Bibliography • Anthony, L. (2011). Products, processes and practitioners: A critical look at the importance of specificity in ESP. Taiwan International ESP Journal. Vol 3:2 1-8 • Bennett, K. (2009). English academic style manuals: A survey. English for specific purposes. 8 p43-54. • Biber, D, Conrad, S and Leech, G. (2002). Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Longman: Harlow. • Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34: 213-238. • Coxhead, A. (2011). The Academic Word List 10 Years On: Research and Teaching Implications. TESOL Quarterly, 45: 355-361

  32. Bibliography • Dovey, T. (2006). What purposes specifically? Re-thinking purposes and specificity in the context of the ‘new vocationalism’, English for Specific Purposes, 25(4), 387-402. • Durrant, P. (2009). Investigating the viability of a collocation list for students of English for academic purposes. English for specific purposes. 28 p157-169. • Eldridge, J. (2008). “No, There Isn’t an ‘Academic Vocabulary’ but…” TESOL Quarterly, 42: 109 – 113 • Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2007). Is there an “Academic Vocabulary”?. TESOL Quarterly, 41: 235 – 253.

  33. Bibliography • Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for specific purposes. 27 p4-21. • James, M.A. (2009). “Far” transfer of learning outcomes from an ESL writing course: Can the gap be bridged? English for Specific Purposes. 18 69-84 • Jordan, R, R. (1998). English for Academic Purposes: A guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. • Ramoroka, B, T. (2012). Teaching Academic Writing for the Disciplines: How far can we be specific in an EAP writing course? English Linguistics Research. 1:2 available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/elr.vln2p33

More Related