1 / 17

Framing the Conversation About the Knowledge Society

Framing the Conversation About the Knowledge Society. John Hawkins Deane Neubauer Senior Seminar EWC-MQA October 21-23, 2007. Some Issues to Keep in Mind. Higher Education is in a highly dynamic state and it is hardly uni-directional

tiana
Download Presentation

Framing the Conversation About the Knowledge Society

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Framing the Conversation About the Knowledge Society John Hawkins Deane Neubauer Senior Seminar EWC-MQA October 21-23, 2007

  2. Some Issues to Keep in Mind • Higher Education is in a highly dynamic state and it is hardly uni-directional • The rates of change for HEIs and the nature of those changes may be more rapid than we are accustomed to • At the core of much of this change are all those “things” that make up the emergent knowledge society itself, e.g. new technologies, new languages, novel notions of “connectivity”, information/knowledge overload, “haves and have-nots”, social networks, etc. • As we talk, here are six other “things” to keep in mind as frames or context elements for our discussions

  3. Exponential-ism • The most extreme of knowledge theorists, e.g. Kurzweil (The Law of Accelerating Returns), posit the exponential growth of information, knowledge, and computing • By these arguments we stand on the threshold of vast and significant changes in how we create, use, transmit information and communicate • The critical questions are whether such changes will change the university as we know it (As seemingly they must!) and how?

  4. Slipping Away • What are the dominant and pervasive change models in higher education? • Is change positive and purposive? or • Is change more reactive and less conscious? • What is the relationship between our institutional change processes and their linkage to social change needs? Who is in charge?

  5. Mission Change and Creep: what should higher education Do? • Arguably “teaching, research, and service” are all changing—in kind and in terms of their relationships to each other • To what extent will HEIs take on missions that align with “who will pay”? • How will HEIs be brought into the great questions of our age: global inequality, conflict and peace, climate change and sea level rise?

  6. The “Student” The world faces at least thee modal demographic patterns—all evident in Asia • Growing older • Staying younger • Steady maturity in persistent population growth • Devising education, including life-long education, to meet alignment and capacity needs across populations • Revising the student with respect to: gender, age, social resources, and repetitive learning needs, and longer stays in university • Shifting from a “teaching paradigm” to a “learning paradigm”

  7. Presentation to KMUTT, October 11, 2009

  8. The Persistent Ambiguity of the “Alignment” Issue • The complex issues embedded in the “vocationalization” of higher education • The marketplace as an area of constant change and mixed signals • How “reactive” should HEIs be in this interaction?

  9. Characteristics of Model • HEIs created own industries off-site; royalties fed back to university • Rise of multi-disciplinary curriculum and research centers • Economic crisis further differentiates research centers in favor of market attractiveness • Value of research is to the degree it creates wealth--research innovation web

  10. Characteristics of Model • Shift away from “a research tradition that has been independent of outside interests (Korten) • Context of: declining public funding, rise of neo-liberalism, concern with alignment with “real world” • Industry support of shift as cost-effective for development teams

  11. Role of Students in New Model • Both graduate and undergraduates now regularly participate in research: UC over 50% of UG involved • Inequality that has always characterized these relations is more pronounced • Exchange system with industry--students as gifts to industry

  12. UCLA’s Clean Tech Project • UCLA/USC; City of LA; NSF; Chamber of Commerce; various firms in LA area • Bringing together of multi-disciplinary centers at UCLA to create new technologies for commercialization • Goal of job creation • New IDP for students; job alignment

  13. Partners • UCLA; USC; Cal Tech • Mayor of LA: Community Redevelopment Agency; LA Business Council; LA Department of Water and Power • Several Business in the LA Area

  14. Role of UCLA “Centers • C Energy, Science and Technology • C Embedded Network Sensing • C Climate Change and the Environ. • C Climate Change and Solutions • C Corporate Environmental Solutions

  15. Students • New IDP Established: Leaders in Sustainability • MA Degree: Science and Business • Funding from NSF • Job Alignment

  16. Can Everyone do This? • It is expensive if done in the dominant paradigm • But an emerging trend pioneered by MIT and others point to a new paradigm • MIT Open Source; China Open Resources for Education (CORE) • The Million Book Project; Dspace; Google Library Project; etc.

  17. Enduring Questions of Public and Private • What prevailing notions of public and private, state and market, will follow this recent ascendant period of neoliberalism? • Who are leaders and who are followers in social discourse over “the public good” as it embraces higher education?

More Related