1 / 22

Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Architecture & Protocols

Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Architecture & Protocols. LISP Team : Vince Fuller, Darrel Lewis, Eliot Lear, Scott Brim, Dave Oran, Elizabeth McGee, Dino Farinacci, and David Meyer Workshop III: Beyond Internet MRA: Networks of Networks Institute for Pure and Applied Mathematics

tiana
Download Presentation

Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Architecture & Protocols

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)Architecture & Protocols LISP Team: Vince Fuller, Darrel Lewis, Eliot Lear, Scott Brim, Dave Oran, Elizabeth McGee, Dino Farinacci, and David Meyer Workshop III: Beyond Internet MRA: Networks of Networks Institute for Pure and Applied Mathematics Nov 3-7, 2008

  2. Agenda • Problem Statement • Locator/ID Separation (and why…) • What is LISP? • LISP Control Plane - LISP+ALT • How LISP sites talk to legacy sites • Other Uses of LISP • Prototype and Pilot Network IPAM MRAWS3

  3. Lower OpEx for Sites and Providers Improve site multi-homing Improve site & provider traffic engineering (3) Reduce size of core routing tables (4) IPv4 Address Conservation? End Site Benefit Easier Transition to IPv6 Change provider without address change Active-Active BGP-free Multihoming Data Center Load Spreading BGP R1 R2 Problem Statement Provider A 10.0.0.0/8 Provider B 11.0.0.0/8 Site with PI Addresses IPAM MRAWS3

  4. Scaling Internet Routing State IPAM MRAWS3

  5. Why Separate Location from ID? • Level of Indirection allows us to: • Keep either ID or Location fixed while changing the other • Basically: Routing Locators need to aggregate topologically, while IDs are usually assigned along administrative boundaries  hard to do with one number space • Create separate namespaces which can have different allocation properties • By keeping IDs fixed • Assign fixed addresses that never change to hosts and routers at a site • You can change Locators • Now the sites can change providers • Now the hosts can move IPAM MRAWS3

  6. ID & Location IPv6: 2001:0102:0304:0506:1111:2222:3333:4444 Locator ID IPv4: 209.131.36.158 .10.0.0.1 ID & Location Locator ID Separating (or adding) an Address Changing the semantics of the IP address If PI, get new locator If PA, get new ID IPAM MRAWS3

  7. S R2 R1 Multi-Level Addressing Provider A 10.0.0.0/8 Provider B 11.0.0.0/8 RLOCs used in the core EIDs are inside of sites IPAM MRAWS3

  8. Host Stack: supplies IDs Host Stack: supplies IDs Router: rewrites RLOCs from existing address Router: supplies RLOCs by adding new header Map-n-Encap vs Address-Rewrite Map-n-Encap Address-Rewrite GSE LISP IPAM MRAWS3

  9. So What is LISP? IPAM MRAWS3

  10. What is LISP? • Locator/ID Separation Protocol • Network-based solution • No changes to hosts whatsoever • No new addressing changes to site devices • Very few configuration file changes • Imperative to be incrementally deployable • Address family agnostic IPAM MRAWS3

  11. New Network Elements Ingress Tunnel Router (ITR) Finds EID to RLOC mapping This is the map part of map-and-encap Encapsulates to Locators at source site This is the encap part of map-and-encap Egress Tunnel Router (ETR) Authoritative for its EID to RLOC mapping Decapsulates at destination site IPAM MRAWS3

  12. S D 11.0.0.1 -> 12.0.0.2 11.0.0.1 -> 12.0.0.2 EID-prefix: 2.0.0.0/8 Locator-set: 12.0.0.2, priority: 1, weight: 50 (D1) 13.0.0.2, priority: 1, weight: 50 (D2) Mapping Entry 1.0.0.1 -> 2.0.0.2 1.0.0.1 -> 2.0.0.2 1.0.0.1 -> 2.0.0.2 1.0.0.1 -> 2.0.0.2 S1 S2 D1 D2 Policy controlled by destination site Packet Forwarding PI EID-prefix 1.0.0.0/8 PI EID-prefix 2.0.0.0/8 ETR ITR Provider A 10.0.0.0/8 Provider X 12.0.0.0/8 12.0.0.2 10.0.0.1 ITR ETR 11.0.0.1 13.0.0.2 Provider B 11.0.0.0/8 Provider Y 13.0.0.0/8 DNS entry: D.abc.com A2.0.0.2 Legend: EIDs -> Green Locators -> Red IPAM MRAWS3

  13. Mapping Database Designs • You need a “map” before you can “encap” • We have designed several mapping database protocols • CONS, NERD, EMACS, ALT • Tradeoff push versus pull benefit/cost • Needs to be scalable to 1010 entries • ALT has the most promise • We are deploying ALT IPAM MRAWS3

  14. What is LISP+ALT? • EID namespace is used at the site • RLOC namespace is used in the Internet core • Mappings need to be authoritative and reside at site ETRs • Advertise EID-prefixes in BGP on an alternate topology of GRE tunnels • ITRs get mappings by routing Map-Requests on ALT topology • ETRs respond with Map-Replies IPAM MRAWS3

  15. 11.0.0.1 -> 240.1.1.1 11.0.0.1 -> 240.1.1.1 240.0.0.1 -> 240.1.1.1 240.0.0.1 -> 240.1.1.1 <- 240.1.1.0/24 < - 240.1.0.0/16 <- 240.1.2.0/24 240.0.0.1 -> 240.1.1.1 240.0.0.1 -> 240.1.1.1 ITR ITR ETR ETR ETR 11.0.0.1 -> 1.1.1.1 ? ? ? ? 1.1.1.1 -> 11.0.0.1 240.0.0.1 -> 240.1.1.1 ALT-rtr ALT-rtr ALT-rtr ALT-rtr ALT-rtr ALT-rtr How LISP+ALT Works EID-prefix 240.0.0.0/24 EID-prefix 240.1.1.0/24 1.1.1.1 11.0.0.1 EID-prefix 240.1.2.0/24 2.2.2.2 12.0.0.1 Legend: EIDs -> Green Locators -> Red GRE Tunnel Low Opex Physical link Data Packet Map-Request Map-Reply 3.3.3.3 ALT EID-prefix 240.2.1.0/24 IPAM MRAWS3

  16. Interworking Model • We’ve built and deployed the interworking mechanisms described in draft-lewis-lisp-interworking-01.txt • LISP Translation • “LISP NAT” • http://www.translate.lisp4.net • Proxy Tunnel Router (PTR) • Advertises coarsely aggregated EID-prefix(es) into the DFZ • Attracts traffic for those prefixes • Behaves like an ITR for that traffic • tr0.partan.com is a v4 PTR • titanium-dmm-alt-only.lisp.uoregon.edu is a v6 PTR • http://www.lisp6.net uses the v6 PTR • http://www.lisp4.net uses the v4 PTR IPAM MRAWS3

  17. Other Uses for LISP • SLBs in Data Centers • ETRs directly connected to servers • ITRs at Data Center edge • A/V Mobile Truck Roll • Avoid renumber at each event • BGP-free Core • Intra-AS avoiding storing external routes • RLOCs are PE routers • Building topological hierarchy with flat addressing • MAC addressing in L2 networks • MAC address mobility for “extended subnets” • In an environment of shortage address supply IPAM MRAWS3

  18. Prototype and Pilot • Prototype has been running for a 1.5 years • NX-OS on Titaniums • IOS is under-way • Considering XR and/or CRS blade implementation • Alpha has been running for 1 year • Map-Request/Reply, ALT, & Interworking • External pilot is underway • Dual-stack ALT • Underlying IPv4 and IPv6 transport • Geographical (registry-based) EID addressing • Interworking IPv4 with translation and PTRs • Interworking IPv6 with PTRs • Low-OpEx xTRs underway IPAM MRAWS3

  19. IPAM MRAWS3

  20. Data Packet EIDs RLOCs Payload OH IH Host Data CE CE CE LISP in one Slide “Separating ID and Location from an IP address through a level of indirection” LISP-ALT Control Plane LISP Site LISP Site Advertises EID-prefixes to find mappings GRE Tunnels GRE Tunnels LISP Routers LISP Routers EIDs EIDs RLOCs RLOCs Physical Links Physical Links Today’s Internet - Data Plane Configure EID ->RLOCs database mappings for local site EIDs assigned by Internet Registries Stores EID ->RLOCs cache mappings for remote sites RLOCs assigned by Service Providers Advertises RLOCsto maintain aggregation and provide reachability to sites • Costs: • Mapping system required • New Software in CE routers • New LISP-ALT infrastructure • Benefits: • Improved low-opex multihoming • Site based policy and reachability • No changes to core routers • No changes to site routers • No DNS changes • No site addressing changes • Works with PI or PA prefixes • Supports 44-over-6 and 66-over-4 • Sites authoritative for their mappings • Interworks with non-LISP sites using • translation or PTRs RLOCs Legend: EIDs (End Site IDs) in green RLOCs (Routing Locators) in red CE: Customer Premise Edge Router ALT: Alternative LISP Topology OH: Outer header, CE to CE IH: Inner header, host to host RLOCs Non-LISP Site Tue Nov 4 18:33:30 PST 2008

  21. LISP Internet Drafts draft-farinacci-lisp-09.txt draft-fuller-lisp-alt-03.txt draft-lewis-lisp-interworking-01.txt draft-farinacci-lisp-multicast-00.txt draft-meyer-lisp-eid-block-01.txt draft-mathy-lisp-dht-00.txt draft-iannone-openlisp-implementation-01.txt draft-brim-lisp-analysis-00.txt draft-meyer-lisp-cons-04.txt draft-lear-lisp-nerd-04.txt draft-curran-lisp-emacs-00.txt IPAM MRAWS3

  22. References • Public mailing list: lisp-interest@lists.civil-tongue.net • Go to a LISP site now: http://www.lisp4.net http://www.lisp6.net IPAM MRAWS3

More Related