1 / 5

BGP Data-Plane Benchmarking Applicable to Modern Routers

Rajiv Papneja Ilya Varlashkin Bhavani Parise Dean Lee Sue Hares. BGP Data-Plane Benchmarking Applicable to Modern Routers. Background/ Current Status. Terminology for Benchmarking BGP Device Convergence in the (RFC 4098) / June 2005 Two complementing BGP Methodology drafts in progress

tiara
Download Presentation

BGP Data-Plane Benchmarking Applicable to Modern Routers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BMWG@IETF84 Rajiv Papneja Ilya Varlashkin Bhavani Parise Dean Lee Sue Hares BGP Data-Plane BenchmarkingApplicable to Modern Routers

  2. BMWG@IETF84 Background/ Current Status • Terminology for Benchmarking BGP Device Convergence in the (RFC 4098) / June 2005 • Two complementing BGP Methodology drafts in progress • Draft-1 focusing on the BGP Data Plane convergence was posted prior IETF 80 • draft-papneja-bgp-basic-dp-convergence-03 • Author team: Rajiv Papneja, Bhavani Parise, Sue Hares, Ilya Varlashkin • Contributors: Deal Lee, Eric Brendal, Mohan Nanduri, Jay Karthik • Draft-2 focuses on Data-plane convergence on modern routers, which have local restoration capability was posted prior to IETF 82 • draft-varlashkin-router-conv-bench-00 • Author Team: Ilya Varlashkin, Rajiv Papneja, Bhavani Parise, Dean Lee • Reviewer: Tara Van Unen

  3. BMWG@IETF84 Current Status & Action Itemsfrom IETF83 • Obtained feedback from multiple Service Providers. Various tests from the draft termed as ‘Valuable’ and ‘Important’ by the Providers • Presented and solicited feedback from IDR • Performed Benchmarking tests based on the methodology from the draft and Presented the Results to BMWG • Current version of draft addresses comments from prior IETFs and comments from WG list • http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-papneja-bgp-basic-dp-convergence-03

  4. BMWG@IETF84 Feedback Specifics for Draft-1 • Tests considered by Verizon as Valuable and Important and have been demonstrated to them • Review from Compass, yielded in PIC test cases • Positive feedback and support on scope and test coverage from architect at FT-Orange • Contributions and Support from IDR Chair • This draft generated interest for collaboration with other draft work being pursued in IDR (gs-vpn-scaling)

  5. BMWG@IETF84 Current Status & Action Items • For Draft-1: • http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-papneja-bgp-basic-dp-convergence-03 • Obtained more positive feedback from additional Service Providers • Can we agree on approach and direction? • Agree on WG-item adoption • For Draft-2: • http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-varlashkin-router-conv-bench-00 • Lack of Capabilities in Protocol Simulators hindering certain test scenarios. Alternative Setup being explored • Inputs welcome!

More Related