40 likes | 146 Views
G ábor Fehér ( feher.gabor@tmit.bme.hu) Krisztián Németh (Krisztian.Nemeth@tmit.bme.hu) András Korn (korn .andras @ tmit .bme.hu) Istv án Cselényi (Istvan.Cselenyi@teliasonera.com). Benchmarking Terminology for Resource Reservation Capable Routers. Editorial changes.
E N D
Gábor Fehér (feher.gabor@tmit.bme.hu) Krisztián Németh(Krisztian.Nemeth@tmit.bme.hu) András Korn (korn.andras@tmit.bme.hu) István Cselényi(Istvan.Cselenyi@teliasonera.com) Benchmarking Terminology for Resource Reservation Capable Routers Fehér – Németh – Korn - Cselényi
Editorial changes • Change of title: was “… routers supporting resource reservation”, became “… resource reservation capable routers” • Lots of re-phrasings throughout • Some clarifications added (e.g. about the issues with multiple idempotent signaling messages arriving in a burst) Fehér – Németh – Korn - Cselényi
Important changes • Router load factors clarified (so it’s clear they are just the observable and controllable levers we can use to stress the router) • Traffic load factors now have a composite unit of [pps; bytes] to better reflect that packets-per-second is just as important as raw Mbps • Signaling message loss redefined as signaling message deficit Fehér – Németh – Korn - Cselényi
Important changes #2 • New section: 3.5 Router Load Conditions and Scalability Limit • Defines “Loss-Free Load Condition”, “Lossy Condition” • Raises issue of “in reasonable time” • Much clearer, more verbose and hopefully more intuitive definition of “Scalability Limit” Fehér – Németh – Korn - Cselényi