170 likes | 408 Views
Biofuels. ECON 373 March 26, 2012. Reference. Bruce Gardner and Wallace Tyner. “Explorations in Biofuels Economics, Policy and History: Introduction to the Special Issue.“ Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization 5(1):1-8, 2007.
E N D
Biofuels ECON 373 March 26, 2012
Reference • Bruce Gardner and Wallace Tyner. “Explorations in Biofuels Economics, Policy and History: Introduction to the Special Issue.“ Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization 5(1):1-8, 2007. • Hill, J. E. Nelson, E. D. Tilman, S. Polasky, and D. Tiffany. “Environmental, Economic, and Energetic Costs and Benefits of Biodiesel and Ethanol Biofuels.” PNAS Vol.103, No. 30; 11206-11210, 2006 • Jörn P. W. Scharlemann and William F. Laurance. "How Green Are Biofuels?“ Science Vol. 319 : 43-44, 2008
What is biofuel? • Energy sources derived from recently living organic material, as opposed to fossil fuels. Biomass energy Biopower Biofuel biodiesel ethanol
Topics relating to biofuels • Demand for biofuels as related to fossil fuel markets • Derived demand for feedstock, particularly agricultural commodities. • Supply of feedstock including resource constraints on feedstock production, in land, water, and capital investment • Environmental benefits and costs in the production and use of biofuels and associated feedstock. • General equilibrium effect on other markets • International trade • Impact of biofuel on global poverty and hunger • Evaluation of policy options for biofuel including biofuel and mandated use of biofuels.
Demand for Ethanol • 2005: 14% of US corn harvest proceed to the ethanol production • 2010: 40% • Devoting all US corn and soybean production to ethanol and biodiesel would offset 12% and 6% of US gasoline and diesel demand
Subsidies on ethanol • Ethanol subsidies link energy policy with agricultural policy. • 51-cents-a-gallon subsidy: voted in 2004. Reduced to 45 cents in 2008
Subsidies • Alternatively to emission taxes, one could subsidize abatement • Economists are in favor of market-based instruments like tax. Subsidy is negative tax • Political feasibility: yes!! Firms love subsidies! • But static inefficiency: • Have to be financed through distorting taxes • Hard to stop once started • In case of subsidy on particular technology: dynamically inefficient: • Does government know which technology is best? • Hampers technology competition • Excess entry
Subsidy = Tax? • Tax: • Subsidy: ) )
How much would the firms abate under subsidy? • marginal abatement costs = subsidy rate s
Subsidies on Abatement • Subsidy (a) $3 and (b) $5 per ton of abatement Table 3. Abatement and Marginal abatement cost schedule for two firms
Regression is everywhere Financial Time: Once more Over a Barrel. March 24, 2012