190 likes | 302 Views
Uplift of low-level air in deep convection. Geraint Vaughan. Example of CO profile. Convective outflow plumes. *. Mean CO out of cloud above 10 km. High variability at low levels (biomass burning). Median CO 1-3 km from Dornier. *. Intercomparison flights. Dornier minus Egrett CO, ppbv.
E N D
Uplift of low-level air in deep convection Geraint Vaughan
Example of CO profile Convective outflow plumes * Mean CO out of cloud above 10 km High variability at low levels (biomass burning) Median CO 1-3 km from Dornier *
Intercomparison flights Dornier minus Egrett CO, ppbv 25 20 AD12 – AE10 15 10 Difference, ppbv 5 0 AD28 – AE30 -5 13.0 12.6 13.4 12.2 Time, h
Biomass burning period (1) and pre-monsoon(3): CO decreases strongly with height
Monsoon period (4): no vertical gradient – strong vertical mixing
Can we explain background changes by long-range transport? • 3-D kinematic back-trajectories calculated from each flight section out of cloud above 200 mb • Most trajectories had ascended from low level in the past 10 days • Point where trajectory ascended through 500 mb surface plotted together with measured background CO from Egrett
Flights through anvil outflow November 16 (left hand panel): CO enhanced in anvil outflow February 6 (right hand panel): CO reduced in anvil outflow Green/Yellow denotes cloud
Where does the anvil air come from? Anvil peaks in CO above 10 km all less than 110 ppbv Boundary-layer outflow at 8 km? Boundary-layer air all > 100 ppbv
Same for AE25 Anvil peaks in CO above 10 km around 55 ppbv Boundary-layer air > 60 ppbv
Definition: Anvil enhancement Inferred out-of cloud CO concentration, by linear interpolation of measured background values A A: Enhancement of CO in the anvil (negative for this flight)
Definition: Vertical Difference • Calculate average CO in 2 km blocks on Egrett descent profile, from 0 – 8 km • Calculate difference between these averages and the mean background above 10 km • Call this the vertical difference Anvil Enhancement * Vertical difference for height 2 km Mean background >10 km Use Egrett descent profile rather than ascent because of problem with Dornier intercomparison. * Mean from 1-3 km
Method • Calculate anvil enhancement for each flight • Calculate vertical difference for seven vertical intervals: 0-2, 1-3, … 6-8 km, for each flight • Plot against each other • Calculate correlation coefficient for each set of vertical differences
Mean anvil enhancement vs. vertical difference, all flights Mean anvil enhancements << vertical differences – suggests mixing 1 : 1 line Line of symbols represents one flight
Correlation coefficients Correlation coefficients increase slowly to a peak at 4-6 km then decrease sharply
Maximum anvil enhancement Maximum anvil enhancements similar in magnitude to vertical differences Max correlation again around 5 km
Conclusions • Trajectory calculations consistent with background upper-level CO measurements: impact of local convection small except in monsoon • Maximum anvil enhancement suggests that uplift from mid-levels dominates anvil composition during pre-monsoon and monsoon break