1 / 23

BACKGROUND The Norwegian Drug Court started 1. January 2006.

BACKGROUND The Norwegian Drug Court started 1. January 2006. Two projects in Oslo and Bergen Established two DC-centres Duration: End of 2010. The purpose of the project Alternative to prison Reduce criminality Reduce use of illegal drugs Improve:

tieve
Download Presentation

BACKGROUND The Norwegian Drug Court started 1. January 2006.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BACKGROUND The Norwegian Drug Court started 1. January 2006. • Two projects in Oslo and Bergen • Established two DC-centres • Duration: End of 2010

  2. The purpose of the project • Alternative to prison • Reduce criminality • Reduce use of illegal drugs • Improve: - health of the participants - social conditions - housing etc.

  3. The Target Groups • The first client into the program March 2006 • People with drug related crime • Motivated for the DC-program - concent to forensic research - meet for consultations at the centre

  4. Oslo • In 2009 44 persons were forensic researched • Only 11 were found suitable for the program Too few suitable for the program?

  5. Gender • In 2009 6 of 44 persons were women • In 2008 6 of 41 persons were women

  6. Who takes initiative to the forensic research? • In Oslo 3/4 of all initiatives were taken by the client’s defender • Just 1/5 of the initiatives were taken by the police • 1/10 by the courts

  7. Oslo (per 31.12.09) • The DC-centre has received 39 persons in the program - 7 persons finished the program - 13 persons are still in the program • 19 persons dropped out of the program - new criminality - did not follow the program

  8. 9 of these dropped the program in 2009 • 5 persons fullfilled the program in 2009 Positive development

  9. EVALUATION: Preliminary Evaluation March 2010 By the end of 2009 totally 85 clients were in the program. Of these 26 clients have been interviewed 3 times.

  10. The Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research (SIRUS) has conducted a preliminary evaluation of the projects in Bergen and Oslo.

  11. Now 85 clients totally in the program • By the end of 2007 47 clients • Of these 26 clients are interviewed at 3 different times during the program: T1 - By the time they enter the program after the sentence in the court T2 - After one year in the program T3 - After two years in the program

  12. Methode/instrument used: ASI (Addiction Severity Index) which covers: - use of illegal drugs - criminality - health - work - family - social condition

  13. Of the 47 clients in 2006 and 2007, 64% dropped out of the program. • 19% (5) of the 26 clients fullfilled the program • 15% (4) are still in the program • 65% (17) have dropped out Is this a good result?

  14. Drop outs • Average time in the program: 223 days • Shortest: 15 days • Longest: 874 days The probation will make the clients stay longer in the project.

  15. Use of drugs on T1, T2 and T3 • T1 - 69% • T2 - 46% • T3 - 54%

  16. Specific drug use (%) N=26 T1 T3 • Heroin 27 12 • Amphetamine 42 39 • Cocaine 8 0 • Cannabis 50 39 There is a certain decline in illegal use of drugs.

  17. Effect on criminality? • Illegal sale or posession of drugs • Stealing, robbery etc. • Violence

  18. Charge with crime (%) T1 T2 T3 Sale or posession 100 23 27 Stealing, robbery 100 38 31 Violence 50 12 15 Other crime 8 4 0 The program seems to have a positive effect on reducing crime.

  19. The gravity of criminality • There is a promising trend towards reducing the gravity of the criminality, specially among the clients who are not in the control institutions. • Internationally: Drug Courts seem to reduce the risk of recidive generally. • This seems also to be the best effect of the DC-program for Norway.

  20. CONCLUSIONS • Scientifically there is no sufficient data to conclude that DC-program will reduce the illegal use of drugs among the clients substansially. However there is a promising tendency. • The DC-program is more promising concerning the aim to reduce the criminality among the clients.

  21. QUESTIONS Do the results make it worth continuing the program? • Resources • Any benefits for the clients • Protecton for the society

More Related