240 likes | 389 Views
Contents. ConceptObjectives of Performance AppraisalProcessMethods- Uses and Limitations. 1. Definitions of Performance Appraisal. Wendell French, the formal, systematic assessment of how well employees are performing their jobs in relation to established standards, and the communication of that
E N D
1. Unit - 3 Performance Appraisal
2. Contents Concept
Objectives of Performance Appraisal
Process
Methods- Uses and Limitations
3. Definitions of Performance Appraisal Wendell French, the formal, systematic assessment of how well employees are performing their jobs in relation to established standards, and the communication of that assessment to employees
4. Concept of Performance Appraisal Performance Appraisal is a method which involves
Setting Work Standards
Assessing Actual Performance
Providing Feedback to the Employees
5. Contents Concept
Objectives of Performance Appraisal
Process
Methods- Uses and Limitations
6. Objectives Feedback to Employee
Compensation Decisions
Reckoner for Promotion / Demotion /Transfer
Inputs for Personal Development
Reduce Subjectivity
Clarity for the Employee
Improves Supervision
7. Contents Concept
Objectives of Performance Appraisal
Process
Methods- Uses and Limitations
8. Who will Appraise? Immediate Supervisor
Employees Peers
Self Appraisal
Employees Subordinates
Higher Level Manager
Personal Department Specialist
9. When to Appraise? Periodic Appraisals
Quarterly, Bi-annually, Yearly
10. What to Appraise? What do we want to evaluate?
Extracted from the Job Analysis
Mostly Organisational Goals which the employee was responsible for
Can also have some Softer Aspects
11. Process of Performance Appraisal Job Analysis
Understanding the deliverables
Detailing the Job Description
Establishing Standards of Performance
Setting Performance Standards
Benchmarks to Measure Performance
Attainable by a Normal Employee
Clear & Understandable
12. Process of Performance Appraisal Communicating Performance Standards
Appraiser vs. Appraisee
Both should be communicated the standards
Communication should be written
Measuring Actual Performance
Objective Measures: Quantitative & Verifiable
Subjective Measures: Personal Standards & Opinions
13. Process of Performance Appraisal Comparing Actual Performance vs. Standards
Note deviations
Could be both positive & negative
Reasons for the deviation
Analysis of Strengths & Weaknesses
Initiating Corrective Action
Positive: Discussion & Improvement Plan
Negative: Scolding & Warning
14. Essentials of a Good Appraisal Reliability
Job Related
Standardisation
Training to Appraisers
Open Communication
Employee Access to Results
Clear Objectives
15. Contents Concept
Objectives of Performance Appraisal
Process
Methods- Uses and Limitations
16. Performance Appraisal Methods Broadly of two types:
Traditional Methods (TM)
Modern Methods (MM)
17. TM: Unstructured Method Appraiser describes his impression
Unstructured manner
Highly subjective in nature
Useful at lower levels
18. TM: Straight Ranking Method Ranking of all the employees
Same unit, same work profile employees
Ranking from best to poorest
Highly subjective
19. TM: Paired Comparison Method Employees of a group are compared with one another, one at a time
Number of comparisons = (N(N-1))/N
Each employee is compared with the other
20. TM: Grading Method Certain categories / grades are determined in advance
Grades are based on a variety of parameters
Actual performance is compared with parameters to allot a grade
21. TM: Critical Incident Method Performance rated on the basis of certain events that occurred during the performance of the job
Incidents represent the outstanding / poor behaviour of the employee
Under this technique the behaviour of the employee in all significant incidents is recorded in a book and reviewed at the end
22. MM: Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS) Rating scales are created using the following approach
Identify Critical Incidents
Select Performance Dimensions
Retranslate Incidents
Assign Scale Values
Rate the employee on the scale
23. MM: Management By Objectives (MBO) What How approach?
Substitutes good intentions with a process where everything is put in black & white
Process
Define Role
Define KRAs
Indicators of Effectiveness
Set SMART objectives
Monitor
24. MM: 360 Appraisal 3 levels of employees rate the performance
Superior
Peers
Subordinates
Holistic view
Rules out the bias of any one person