270 likes | 277 Views
This article provides an overview of ASAR AP and GM level 0 product quality analysis, including systematic evaluations and detailed analysis through SARCON software. It explores downlink data quality, echo data statistics, and noise measurements to ensure product reliability and accuracy for remote sensing applications.
E N D
ASAR Validation Review AP and GM Level 0 Product Quality Birgit SchättlerRemote Sensing Technology InstituteGerman Aerospace Center (DLR)
Overview Objectives and Approach Downlink Data Quality Echo Data Statistics Detailed Analysis of an AP Level 0 Product Detailed Analysis of a GM Level 0 Product Summary and Conclusions
ensure, that ASAR AP and GM level 0 products do not show systematic deficiencies start the quantitative analysis of raw data parameters like echo data statistics, noise measurements, … Objectives
Evaluate systematically and automatically level 1B product annotation parameters related to level 0 product quality (e.g. downlink data quality, echo data statistics, noise measurements ) using a tool incorporated into the PDS functionality not yet available => only restricted systematic analysis possibilities based on CBTS (“Chris Buck Tool Set”) Perform a detailed analysis of selected level 0 products using SARCON, an off-line SAR product quality analysis software Approach
AP systematic analysis based on annotations of 106 products only : 57 APM, 49 APP 18 IS 1 : 1 VH 8 VV VH 9 HV HH, 24 IS 2 : 3 HH 13 VV VH 5 HV HH 3 VV HH 8 IS 3 : 2 VH 6 VV VH 22 IS 4 : 2 VH 4 HH 8 VV VH 8 HV HH 16 IS 5 : 2 VH 6 VV VH 8 HV HH 8 IS 6 : 5 VV VH 3 HV HH 10 IS 7 : 3 VV VH 7 HV HH AP Systematic Analysis
missing range lines detected in 3 products:1 with 7 missing, 2 with 1 missing each product with 7 missing range lines has 2 corrupted auxiliary codes, all other products show no auxiliary code error at all missing lines percentage = 0.00014 % (9 missing out of 6392012) Good downlink data quality can be assumed AP Downlink Data Quality Summary
ASA_APH_0PNPDK20021106_094707_000000892011_00022_03583_0043.N1ASA_APH_0PNPDK20021106_094707_000000892011_00022_03583_0043.N1 Netherlands calibration site with transponders in H/V and H/H polarisation, beam IS 6 “nominal timeline anomaly” no anomalies observed Detailed Analysis of an AP IS 2 Product
no missing / erroneous ISPs no missing range lines no errors in analysed auxiliary codes perfect downlink data quality Downlink Data Quality
initial noise : 8 lines in HV and 8 lines in HH initial calibration sequence : 97 pulses in HV and 97 pulses in HH pre-flight observed anomaly in periodic cycle is now the nominal case handled by PF_ASAR timeline according to expectation AP Timeline (Initial Cycle)
pre-flight observed 237 echo + 1 cal in HV 237 echo in HH 237 echo in HV 238 echo in HH ----------------------- 238 echo in HV 237 echo + 1 cal in HH 238 echo in HV 238 echo in HH ----------------------- 237 echo + 1 cal in HV 237 echo in HH 237 echo in HV 238 echo in HH ----------------------- . . . . . . AP Timeline (Periodic Cycles) specified 237 echo + 1 cal in HV 238 echo in HH 238 echo in HV 238 echo in HH ----------------------- 238 echo in HV 237 echo + 1 cal in HH 238 echo in HV 238 echo in HH ----------------------- 237 echo + 1 cal in HV 238 echo in HH 238 echo in HV 238 echo in HH ----------------------- . . . . . .
no echo data saturation dynamic range not fully used Q channel Q channel I channel I channel Echo Data Histograms and Statistics HV polarisation I Bias = 0.001730 Q Bias = 0.001793 I Stddev = 0.051607 Q Stddev = 0.051510 IQ Gain imbalance = 1.001875 IQ Non-orthogonality = 0.003519 HH polarisation I Bias = 0.001765 Q Bias = 0.001854 I Stddev = 0.122002 Q Stddev = 0.121865 IQ Gain imbalance = 1.001119 IQ Non-orthogonality = 0.004364
Echo Data Visual Inspection HH HV no anomalies observed
Range-Compressed Data Visual Inspection no anomalies observed HH HV
ASA_GM__0PNPDK20021114_071147_000001062011_00135_03696_0211 in VV polarization region in the north of Russia anomaly observed with instrument characterization file : wrong subsampling factors for beam SS2 … SS5corrected INS file delivered by ESRIN Detailed Analysis of a GM Product
no missing or erroneous source packet no single error in analysed auxiliary codes (PRI, SWST, SWL, up/down converter, TX pulse length, TX pulse bandwidth, resampling factor) perfect downlink data quality Downlink Data Quality
no echo data saturation dynamic range not fully used Echo Data Histogram Q I SS1 SS5
Echo Data Statistics swath SS1: I Bias = 0.001516, Q Bias = 0.001479 I Stddev = 0.070892, Q Stddev = 0.070799 IQ Gain imbalance = 1.001307, IQ Non-orthogonality = 0.002945 swath SS5: I Bias = 0.001495, Q Bias = 0.001429 I Stddev = 0.080410, Q Stddev = 0.080333 IQ Gain imbalance = 1.000956, IQ Non-orthogonality = 0.001402
SS1 Echo Data Visual Inspection
Initial Calibration Pulses P1 P1A P2 P3 SS1
Periodic Calibration Pulses P1 P1A P2 P3 SS1
Analysed AP and GM level 0 products show a good overall product quality. First AP quantitative measurement results could be obtained, but based on a small variety of products only Only one GM product available Summary and Conclusions (I)
Detailed analysis of selected level 0 products will be done only for “suspicious” products in the future The operational PDS tool for a systematic and automatic parameter evaluation is urgently needed- as indicator for possible anomalies - for further overall quality assessment - for further quantitative measurements Summary and Conclusions (II)