1 / 64

The Ohio Center for Ecology & Evolutionary Studies 2010 KITZMILLER LECTURE

The Ohio Center for Ecology & Evolutionary Studies 2010 KITZMILLER LECTURE. Dr. Elliott Sober. Hans Reichenbach Professor & William F. Vilas Research Professor University of Wisconsin - Madison. Charles Darwin and “Intelligent design”. Sponsored by OCEES &

tirzah
Download Presentation

The Ohio Center for Ecology & Evolutionary Studies 2010 KITZMILLER LECTURE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Ohio Center for Ecology & Evolutionary Studies 2010 KITZMILLER LECTURE Dr. Elliott Sober Hans Reichenbach Professor & William F. Vilas Research Professor University of Wisconsin - Madison Charles Darwin and “Intelligent design” Sponsored by OCEES & The Kennedy Lecture Series Biological Sciences Biomedical Sciences Philosophy The College of Arts & Sciences

  2. Albert Einstein Hans Reichenbach Elliott Sober Hilary Putnam analytical philosophy the mind language mathematics computer sciences probability relativity time and space quantum mechanics simplicity parsimony evolutionary biology

  3. Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Theory Evolutionary Philosophy Adaptationism and Optimality Psychology of Unselfish Behavior Reconstructing the Past Parsimony, Evolution, and Inference The Nature of Selection Important underpinnings of Evolutionary Biology

  4. Darwinism and Intelligent Design Elliott Sober Philosophy Department University of Wisconsin, Madison

  5. Outline 1 What is Evolutionary Theory? 2 God and Evolution – 3 options, not 2 3 Guided Mutations 4 Darwin’s views on God and Christianity

  6. What is evolutionary theory? • It views present species as tracing back to common ancestors.

  7. v the only diagram in the Origin

  8. What is evolutionary theory? It views present species as tracing back to common ancestors. It regards natural selection as an important cause of the diversity we observe. 8

  9. What is evolutionary theory? It views present species as tracing back to common ancestors. It regards natural selection as an important cause of the diversity we observe. It regards mutations as unguided. 9

  10. Evolutionary theory is a scientific theory, not a philosophy. It says nothing about God, or materialism, or ethics, or free will, or life after death. It obeys the principle of “methodological naturalism,” not “metaphysical naturalism.”

  11. Methodological Naturalism: scientific theories should not postulate the existence of a supernatural God. Metaphysical Naturalism: No supernatural God exists. The 2 naturalisms 11

  12. Methodological Naturalism: scientific theories should not postulate the existence of a supernatural God. Metaphysical Naturalism: No supernatural God exists. Evolutionary theory embraces the former, not the latter. The 2 naturalisms 12

  13. Outline 1 What is Evolutionary Theory? 2 God and Evolution – 3 options, not 2 3 Guided Mutations 4 Darwin’s views on God and Christianity

  14. God and Evolution – 3 options, not 2 Atheistic Evolutionism – Evolutionary theory is true and there is no God.

  15. God and Evolution – 3 options, not 2 Atheistic Evolutionism – Evolutionary theory is true and there is no God. Creationism – Evolutionary theory is false and God exists.

  16. God and Evolution – 3 options, not 2 Atheistic Evolutionism – Evolutionary theory is true and there is no God. Creationism – Evolutionary theory is false and God exists. Are theism and evolutionary theory inconsistent with each other?

  17. “… any confusion between the ideas suggestedby science and science itself must be carefully avoided.” ─ Jacques Monod, Chance and Necessity

  18. God and Evolution – 3 options, not 2 Atheistic Evolutionism – Evolutionary theory is true and there is no God. Creationism – Evolutionary theory is false and God exists. Theistic Evolutionism – Evolutionary theory is true and God exists.

  19. 2 types of theistic evolutionism Deism – God produces organisms via the evolutionary process and then never intervenes in what happens. An interventionist God – God produces organisms via the evolutionary process and sometimes intervenes in what happens.

  20. Outline 1 What is Evolutionary Theory? 2 God and Evolution – 3 options, not 2 3 Guided Mutations 4 Darwin’s views on God and Christianity

  21. Theism and mutations • Evolutionary theory says that mutations are “unguided.” • Does this mean that the theory denies that God influences which mutations occur?

  22. Guided mutations and evolutionary theory What do biologists mean by saying that mutations are unguided or undirected or random? 26

  23. Guided mutations and evolutionary theory What do biologists mean by saying that mutations are unguided or undirected or random? This does not mean that they are uncaused. 27

  24. Guided mutations and evolutionary theory What do biologists mean by saying that mutations are unguided or undirected or random? This does not mean that they are uncaused. It means that they do not occur because they would be useful to the organism. 28

  25. Some blueorganisms are placed into a green environment, others into a red. An experiment 29 29

  26. Some blueorganisms are placed into a green environment, others into a red. Protective coloration is advantageous. In a green environment, green organisms survive better than red organisms. In a red environment, the reverse is true. An experiment 30 30

  27. Environment is red green red f1 f2 Mutate to green f3 f4 Look at the frequencies with which blue organisms mutate to … 31 31

  28. Environment is red green red f1 ≈f2 Mutate to ≈ ≈ green f3 ≈ f4 the results 32 32

  29. the conclusion to draw The probabilities of these mutations are not affected by the fact that one would be better for the organism than the other. 33 33

  30. the conclusion to draw The probabilities of these mutations are not affected by the fact that one would be better for the organism than the other. This conclusion does not rule out the idea that God causes everything. 34 34

  31. Coins do not land heads or tails because this would be good for gamblers. Mutations do not occur because they would be good for organisms. Both claims are consistent with God’s causing everything. an analogy: mutations and coin tosses 35 35

  32. Tossing coins and seeing whether they land heads more often when this would help gamblers. Monitoring mutations and seeing whether they occur more often when they would be good for organisms. an analogy: mutations and coin tosses 36 36

  33. Tossing coins and seeing whether they land heads more often when this would help gamblers. Monitoring mutations and seeing whether they occur more often when they would be good for organisms. Neither experiment tests whether God intervenes in nature. an analogy: mutations and coin tosses 37 37

  34. Outline 1 What is Evolutionary Theory? 2 God and Evolution – 3 options, not 2 3 Guided Mutations 4 Darwin’s views on God and Christianity

  35. Darwin’s views on … Theistic Evolution v Creationism why special creation is a poor scientific theory whether God exists Christianity

  36. The Origin begins with a quotationfrom the philosopher William Whewell: “But with regard to the material world, we can at least go so far as this – we can perceive that events are brought about not by insulated interpositions of Divine power, exerted in each particular case, but by the establishment of general laws.”

  37. 2 views of God’s relation to nature “But with regard to the material world, we can at least go so far as this – we can perceive that events are brought about not by insulated interpositions of Divine power, exerted in each particular case, but by the establishment of general laws.” 41

  38. 2 views of God’s relation to nature “But with regard to the material world, we can at least go so far as this – we can perceive that events are brought about not by insulated interpositions of Divine power, exerted in each particular case, but by the establishment of general laws.” 42

  39. the 2 possibilities God’s 1st decision observation 1 God’s 2nd decision observation 2 (D) … … God’s nth decision observation n observation 1 (U) God general laws observation 2 … observation n

  40. Which theistic framework did Darwin prefer? “to my mind it accords better with what we know of the laws impressed on matter by the Creator, that the production and extinction of the past and present inhabitants of the world should have been due to secondary causes, like those determining the birth and death of the individual.” Origin

  41. Darwin was inspired by Newton “There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.”

  42. Why Darwin preferred the Unified Model U “On the ordinary view of the independent creation of each being, we can only say that so it is -- that it has so pleased the Creator to construct each animal and plant.”

  43. Why Darwin preferred the Unified Model U “On the ordinary view of the independent creation of each being, we can only say that so it is -- that it has so pleased the Creator to construct each animal and plant.” D thought that special creation is scientifically empty. 47

  44. Was Darwin a theist? “the extreme difficulty or rather impossibility of conceiving this immense and wonderful universe, including man … as the result of blind chance or necessity …I feel compelled to look to a First Cause having an intelligent mind in some degree analogous to that of man; and I deserve to be called a theist.” D’s Autobiography

  45. But on the next page … Darwin refers to himself as an “agnostic,” by which he says he means someone “who has no assured and ever present belief in the existence of a personal God or of a future existence with retribution and reward.” Elsewhere, Darwin describes himself as being in a “muddle.”

  46. Francis Darwin, quoting his father: “the mystery of the beginning of all things is insoluble by us; and I for one must be content to remain an Agnostic.” “I think an Agnostic would be the more correct description of my state of mind.  The whole subject [of God] is beyond the scope of man's intellect.”

More Related