50 likes | 131 Views
Individual, study, and neighborhood characteristics associated with peer recruitment of young illicit drug users: Optimizing Respondent-Driven Sampling. AE Rudolph 1 , ND Crawford 2, 3 , C Latkin 1 , K White 4 , E Benjamin 2 , K Jones 2 , D Celentano 1 , and CM Fuller 2,3
E N D
Individual, study, and neighborhood characteristics associated with peer recruitment of young illicit drug users: Optimizing Respondent-Driven Sampling AE Rudolph1, ND Crawford2, 3, C Latkin1, K White4, E Benjamin2, K Jones2, D Celentano1, and CM Fuller2,3 1Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University 2Center for Urban Epidemiologic Studies, New York Academy of Medicine 3Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University 4Harvard School of Public Health XVIII International AIDS Conference July 20, 2010 Austria, Vienna November 11th, 2009
Table 1. Prevalence of Individual, Study, and Neighborhood Level Correlates of Peer Recruitment, New York City, 2006-2009. (N=390) Individual-level Study-level Neighborhood-level Recruitment Borough Percent (%)
Table 2. Final Multi-level Model for Individual, Study, and Neighborhood Level Correlates of Peer Recruitment, New York City, 2006-2009.
Discussion • Study-level and neighborhood-level characteristics significantly influence peer recruitment success; individual characteristics were less important • RDSTs increased peer recruitment, facilitated the extension of recruitment chains, and contributed to the recruitment of a more diverse study sample. • Despite negative attitudes about drug use and drug users in the recruitment neighborhoods, RDST attendance, helped participants surmount these recruiting obstacles. • RDSTs could be used to: • Boost peer recruitment for RDS studies • Facilitate the dissemination of intervention materials and messages through peer-driven intervention studies conducted in areas with increased stigma.
Acknowledgements Funding Source: National Institute on Drug Abuse: R01 DA019964-01 & T32 DA007282