180 likes | 306 Views
Cross-Country Synthesis of the Generic Design Issues of First- and Second-Generation Agricultural Market Information Models Dr. Andrew Muganga Kizito Department of Statistical Methods and Actuarial Science Makerere University September 15, 2011. Motivation of Study.
E N D
Cross-Country Synthesis of the Generic Design Issues of First- and Second-Generation Agricultural Market Information ModelsDr. Andrew Muganga KizitoDepartment of Statistical Methods and Actuarial ScienceMakerere UniversitySeptember 15, 2011
Motivation of Study Problems of Early Generation MIS (1980s-1990s) • Did not meet user needs • Were not financially sustainable Environment • Change in government policies • Evolution of markets • Spread of ICT • Emergence of many MIS models • What MIS models to invest in Contribution of Study • No systematic framework for analysis of MIS models
Key Questions • What evidence supports the premises that new MIS models are likely to meet user needs and become financially sustainable in comparison to the first-generation MIS models? • How have different MIS models tried to address the generic design issues and what are the relative advantages in addressing those issues? • What are the implications for stakeholders in terms of promoting and supporting different types of MIS?
Sources of Information and Methods • Literature review of MIS in USA, Asia, and Africa • Case studies of MIS in Mozambique, Ethiopia, and Zambia • E-survey of MIS practitioners in Africa and Asia (India) in collaboration with CIRAD and INRA in France. • World Bank world development indicators • Meetings and a workshop on MIS in France in March 2010 • Past experience from working on MIS in the East Africa
Cross-Country Synthesis of the Generic Design Issues of Emerging and Traditional MIS Models Key structural design issues / premises • Perceived Mandate • Institutional home, organization, and coordination • Nature of commodities covered Key conduct design issues / premises 1. Information Provided and Frequency 2. ICT used in transmission and diffusion 3. Funding Strategies 4. Data collection methods used 5. Quality control methods 6. Feedback mechanisms used
Structure: MIS perceived mandate (Aims and Objectives and Clientele)
Structure: Designing incentives for MIS staff Non-government MIS face more “high-power incentives” than public MIS to deal with poor incentive problems such as: • Low staff salaries (e.g., SIMA Mozambique, AMIC-Zambia) • Fixed staff salaries • Excessive bureaucracy • Reliance on behavioral monitoring instead of output-based monitoring
Geographical Coverage, Centralization /Decentralization and Nature of commodities covered
Conduct: Quality Control Methods and Feedback Mechanisms Used
Implications for MIS design • Environment in which they operate matters for all MIS types • Great heterogeneity among MIS in terms of design issues • No explanatory value in government- vs. non-government MIS • Designing Incentives for MIS Staff • Increasing wages • Autonomy and residual claimancy • Hiring locally • From behavioral to output monitoring • Training MIS staff
Implications for MIS design 5. Based on information provided and needs of users • Provision of price and quantity forecasts • Specialization in the Production of MIS Products 6. Providing information subsidies to poor users
The End Thank You Comments and Questions Are Welcome