1 / 9

Preliminary L2 sensors irradiation results WBS 1.1.1

Preliminary L2 sensors irradiation results WBS 1.1.1. Regina Demina Kansas State University. Irradiation at KSU JRM. Facility: James R Macdonald lab at KSU 5-15 MeV proton beam Beam swept by electrostatic deflector for uniform irradiation can vary intensity to receive up to 1 Mrad/hour

tola
Download Presentation

Preliminary L2 sensors irradiation results WBS 1.1.1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Preliminary L2 sensors irradiation resultsWBS 1.1.1 Regina Demina Kansas State University

  2. Irradiation at KSU JRM Facility: James R Macdonald lab at KSU • 5-15 MeV proton beam • Beam swept by electrostatic deflector for uniform irradiation • can vary intensity to receive up to 1 Mrad/hour • Sensors are held in vacuum chamber • Flux is measured by a Faraday cup. • Probing facility • Cold chuck – to 0oC Target chamber

  3. Requirements for silicon sensors • Main challenge for silicon sensors - radiation • Depletion voltage (F) • Leakage current (F)  noise • Doses comparable to LHC – use their R&D • NB: Uncertainty in F estimate– conservative approach 10 years of CMS at inner radius

  4. L2 preliminary results For L2 20 fb-1  26 E12 1 Mev n/cm2 Point of inversion ~ 90 E12 n/cm2

  5. L2 preliminary results For L2 20 fb-1  26 E12 1 Mev n/cm2 Alpha from this result ~1.2E-17A/cm, Frank used 3 in his estimates

  6. Some break down seen after irradiation • Vbreak = ~550 V • After 1.2 E14 n/cm2

  7. Summary • I don’t think we have any problems with L2 sensors

  8. Spec L0, L1 Vbreak>700 V Spec L2-5 Vbreak>350 V Depletion voltage Specification on breakdown voltage derived based on depletion voltage evolution T=-10oC with warm up periods Hamburg model =20fb-1

  9. Signal to noise ratio • Noise contributions: • Capacitive load: 450+43C(pF) • Al strip resistance + analogue cables (L0) • Shot noise Ileak=I0+aFAd (a=3E-17A/cm) • Thermal noise in Rbias Ileak=16mA/cm2 Goal: S/N> 10 Possible if T<-10oC for L0 and L1 T<-5oC for L2 – L5 Important to test Ileak after irradiation on prototype sensors and on test structures during production

More Related