170 likes | 389 Views
The MOA Programme: Did we really do that?. Darrell Siebert. Collections Database Project. interest dating from well before 2000 trial installation of EMu by Fish Group (Zoology) 130,000 specimen records Loans system etc. EU tendering process, EMu selected budget of £1.6 million agreed.
E N D
The MOA Programme: Did we really do that? Darrell Siebert
Collections Database Project • interest dating from well before 2000 • trial installation of EMu by Fish Group (Zoology) • 130,000 specimen records • Loans system • etc. • EU tendering process, EMu selected • budget of £1.6 million agreed
MOA Programme(Museum Online Access) • Integrate 5 Science departments in a single Collections Management System • Implement consistent collection standards, policies and procedures • Installation complete in 3 years • Original proposal was 5 years • On budget
MOA Programme Programme Sponsor (Graham Higley, Head LIS) NHM Project Manager (Marion Raiser) Ke Software Project Manager (Andrew Brown) Programme Team (Project Manager + Team Leaders) Mineralogy D. Smith Project Team: subject experts testers Entomology B. Pitkin C. Lyal A. Hine Project Team: subject experts testers Palaeontology S. Long Project Team: subject experts testers Zoology D. Siebert Project Team: subject experts testers Botany S. Grant Project Team: subject experts testers
Mineralogy • unified 14 separate data sources • 400,000 specimen records • 130,000 sites • development of new Analysis module
Entomology • unified 13 different data sources • 1 million catalogue records • 710,000 collection index records • 1.2 million taxonomic names • significant extensions to Taxonomy module • developed new Collection Index module
Palaeontology • unified 2 data sources • 200,000 specimen records • new Stratigraphy module • new conservation modules • Interventive Processes • Condition Report
Zoology • unified 5 data sources • over 1 million catalogue records • 200,000 taxonomic names • management of specimen, parts and preparations • new Requisition module
Botany • unified > 60 data sources • 500,000 catalogue records • 230,000 taxonomic names • management of everything from herbarium sheets to field note books • significant extensions to Sites for locality data
General • new museum-wide processes • common loans system • object entry & acquisition • integrated multimedia
EMu Application Developments • NHM a contributor to a global community of EMu users • Mineralogy • New Analysis module • Entomology • New Collection Index module, significant redesign of Taxonomy module • Palaeontology • New Stratigraphy and Conservation (2) modules • Zoology • New Requisition module • Botany • Significant extension of Sites module
Data from 5 Science Departments • Main data sources • Mineralogy 14 • Entomology 13 • Palaeontology 2 • Zoology 5 • Botany > 60
EMu database records created • 13.7 million records in total • Catalogue records (3.1 million) • Mineralogy 400,000 • Entomology 1,000,000 • Palaeontology 200,000 • Zoology 1,000,000 • Botany 500,000 • Taxonomy records (1.6 million) • Other types of record
Business Outcomes • Single, fully integrated Collection Management system • Reconciliation of curatorial policies, procedures, and activities; embedded in EMu • Under budget • ~£1.525M • Completed in just over 3 years • As of 1st April 2008 EMu is a core NHM business system • More done than in original prospectus • Loans, etc. • Established NHM as global leader in collection databasing
Business Outcomes – Future benefits • Web access across whole Museum, and to the public • Data provider • Portals, GBIF, OAI (e.g. Google) • Data sharing • With science partners • On-going evolution of EMu system driven by our large, specialised user-base • Standards for interaction with other systems