400 likes | 738 Views
Control Group: Definition. The reference group or standard treatment against which a new treatment is comparedThe basis for comparison in a clinical trialAnchor for comparison. Trial reports should have many phrases like
E N D
1. Control Groups in Clinical Trials
2. Control Group: Definition The reference group or standard treatment against which a new treatment is compared
The basis for comparison in a clinical trial
Anchor for comparison
3. Types of Controls Concurrent
Randomized
Placebo
No treatment
Dose response
Active
Single treatment
Choice of treatments
Optimized management
Usual care
Non-Randomized
Historical (e.g., patient registry)
Combination of randomized and non-randomized (concurrent or historical)
4. Meinert gives the following requirements for experimental and control treatments: Must be distinguishable
Medically justifiable
Ethically OK
Both must be acceptable to patients and investigators
Reasonable doubt concerning efficacy
Should be reason to believe benefits outweigh risks
Method of administration should be as similar as possible to real-world use
5. Placebos Placebo (def.) - A medication prescribed more for the mental relief of the patient than for its actual effect on the disorder; something tending to soothe
- Webster’s Dictionary
A pharmacologically inactive agent to maintain blinding in a clinical trial (no specific action on the patient’s symptoms or disease)
6. Angina Pectorisand the Placebo Effect (Benson, H., NEJM, 1979)
Subjective improvement for five 82.4 ± 9.7%inactive treatments used prior to1960 (13 studies, 1187 patients)
7. Treatment of Mild Hypertension Trial
Selected self-reported side-effects (placebo versus active treatment)
Weakness 18% versus 16%
Headaches 34% versus 22%
Muscle pain 33% versus 26%
8. Example After 2nd day of treatment:
Cured/
Cured Improved
Antihistamine 13.4% 68.2%
9. Second Day of Treatment:
Cured/
Cured Improved
Antihistamine 13.4% 68.2%
Placebo 13.9% 64.7%
10.
1) Suggestion (placebo effect)
2) Changes in course of disease
11. Placebo Effect Subjective changes as well as objective physiological changes (beneficial and toxic) produced by placebo (not limited to psychological responses)
12. Can the Placebo be the Cure?Science, April 9, 1999 “Merck was struck by the curse of the placebo effect…patients who had received a dummy pill had done unexpectedly well. …it highlights a chronic problem for psychopharmacology – the placebo effect”
13. Example of Impact of Placebo Responderson Results of a Trial A Crossover Experiment of Four Treatments
14. Reference: Jellinek, Biometrics Bulletin
A = a + b + c
B = a + c
C = a + b
D = placebo
Response variable = fraction of headaches relieved
A 0.84
B 0.80
C 0.80
D 0.52
15. A Comparison of Response to Treatments A, B and C by the Response to D (Placebo) A 0.82
B 0.87
C 0.82
120/199 Subjects
16. A 0.88
B 0.67
C 0.77
79/199 Subjects
17. Placebo Effect Summary 1. Placebos can be very effective particularly as judged by subjective response variables
2. Placebos control both for suggestion and spontaneous changes in course of disease – usually difficult to disentangle
3. Removal of “placebo responders” before randomization (more later on this)
May make it easier to detect treatment differences; and
Alters questions being asked
18. Considerations in Using aNo Treatment/Placebo Control No standard therapy with established efficacy
Cost/availability of standard therapy
Size/clarity of results
Toxicity of test treatment
Risk to patients
Informed consent
19. Considerations for Use of Placebo Controls
20. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Advantages of placebo-controlled trials
Ability to demonstrate efficacy credibly
Measures “absolute” effectiveness and safety
Efficiency
Minimizes effect of subject and investigator expectations
21. Controversial Issues Concerning Use of Placebos
Short-term studies of treatments with known long-term benefits, e.g., what is short-term? how much risk is tolerable?
Withdrawal of active treatment and random assignment to new drug or placebo, e.g., psychiatric trials
Definition of “standard of care” varies from country to country.
22. Perinatal Transmission of HIV PACTG 076 established that efficacy of zidovudine (AZT) in preventing transmission from mother to child (67.5% relative reduction)
AZT – antepartum (oral), intrapartum (IV), plus AZT for newborn
Are placebo controlled trials of simpler, less costly regimens in other countries ethical?
23. In many active controlled trials, placebos are used to facilitate blinding. New Treatment + Optimal Medical Management
versus
Placebo for New Treatment + Optimal Medical Management
24. Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study (TOMHS) Weight Loss + Na Reduction +
Alcohol Reduction
and
25. Placebos Are Also Used In Active Controlled Studies for Blinding A = slow release A = conventional tablet
(200 mg) (100 mg)
B = placebo B = conventional tablet (100 mg)
26. “Add On” Study AZT AZT
+ +
3TC vs. 3TC
+ +
Indinavir Placebo
Hammer et al., NEJM 1997; 337:725-33.
27. Randomized Discontinuation Design Withdraw vs. Continue BP Meds BP Meds (Placebo)
+ +
Nutrition Nutrition Advice Advice
28. “Take Away” Studies
30. CONVINCE Clinical Trial
31. Optimal Medical Care (or Management) Control
32. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial(MRFIT)
33. In MRFIT “Usual Care” Was Pretty Good! ? DBP (mm Hg) -10.5 -7.4
? cholesterol (mg/dl) -12.3 -6.4
% quitting smoking 46 29
34. MRFIT Illustrates Challenges Defining“Usual Care” Tension between control over experimental conditions versus relevance to clinical care – how strictly should control treatment be specified? (explanatory versus pragmatic approach)
Best practices may be under-utilized in the “real-world”
Evidence base to guide usual care may not be optimal and may change over a long-term study.
35. One of Muench’s Postulate “Nothing improves the performance of therapy like the weakness of controls in its appraisal.”
36. Low Dose vs. Intermediate Dose vs. High Dose vs. Placebo
Dose Comparison/Escalation
37. Cannot compare dose levels from a trial designed to compare two forms of management.
If dose is determined by response of patient, then responses of patients at different dose levels cannot be compared. Circular Motion(Bradford Hill)
38. Cox-2 Inhibitor Studies VIGOR – rofecoxib (Vioxx) versus naproxen
APPROVe – rofecoxib (Vioxx) versus placebo
MEDAL – etoricoxib versus diclofenac (should the comparator have been naproxen?)
39. Often Cited Reasonsfor Uncontrolled Studies 1. Unnecessary for large effects
2. Controlled studies are more difficult to implement
3. Availability of patients
4. Ethical reasons– no control treatment available– untreated patients at high risk of death or serious illness
5. Historical data for comparison is available
40. Historical Controls Could Result in An Effective Treatment Being Abandoned: REMATCH Trial in Advanced HF Design assumptions 75% 50%
Results of trial 92% 77%
Source: NEJM, 2001 15:1435-1443.
41. SummaryConsiderations in Choice of Experimental and Control Treatments Acceptability by patients and clinicians
Indifference/doubt concerning relative efficacy/safety
Some basis for thinking that there could be a difference of clinical/public health importance
Timing is everything!