1 / 26

Air Traffic Control Communication

Air Traffic Control Communication. Content. Communication in air traffic control and its role. Language interaction between air crew and air traffic controllers. Controller pilot data link communication (CPDLC). Subnet and network connectivity. Air telecommunications systems.

toneyl
Download Presentation

Air Traffic Control Communication

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Air Traffic Control Communication

  2. Content • Communication in air traffic control and its role. • Language interaction between air crew and air traffic controllers. • Controller pilot data link communication (CPDLC). • Subnet and network connectivity. • Air telecommunications systems.

  3. Communication in air traffic control and its role The communication element of CNS/ATM systems provides for the exchange of aeronautical data and messages between users and/or automated systems. • Communication systems are also used in support of specific navigation and surveillance functions. There are some fundamental differences between conventional aeronautical communication systems and those forming parts of new CNS/ATM systems. Key features of the new systems are: • Most routine communications are done by data interchange; • Voice communications are mainly used in non-routine and emergency situations; • Emphasis is placed on global connectivity and operation.

  4. Lack of language interaction between air crew and air traffic controllers • Bad information capacity of air communication • Ambiguity of terms and means • Contradictoriness of orders • Weak defence of informations from external action • Signal distortion

  5. Causes of air accidents Aeronautical Engineering Failures 18,5% Errors of Aircrew 64,5% Adverse Weather Conditionsand Mid-Air Collision 14,5% Others 2,5%

  6. Manual on the Implementation of Language Proficiency Requirements (Doc.9834 March 5th, 2008) • a minimum level of English language proficiency will be required byDoc. 9834,contains the language assessment criteria in theRating Scaleand theHolistic Descriptors. These assessment criteria describe the elements of language proficiency for aviation across six language skill profiles: Pronunciation, Structure, Vocabulary, Fluency, Comprehension, Interactions. • Proficiencyis divided into six levels from pre-elementary (level one) to expert (level six).Pilots and air traffic controllers are required to reach aminimum of Operational level fourin each language profile.

  7. The European strategies for Voice Communications Data Communications To meet growing demand for new communication channels, the VHF band has been sub-divided to provide channels at frequency intervalsof 8.33kHz (heretofore – 25 kHz)

  8. Transmission of air-ground messages and data will be carried out through one of thefollowing communication means: • Aeronautical Mobile-Satellite Service (AMSS) (voice and data); • VHF (analogue voice); • HF (analogue voice); • VHF Digital Link (VDL) Mode 2 (data), Mode 3 (digital voice and data) and Mode4 (data); • SSR Mode S Data Link (data); • HF Data Link (data).

  9. Data Communications • Data Link has been shown to reduce workload for ATC and promises increased airspace capacity. • To take advantage of current aircraft equipage and to obtain early experience of data link usage, data link using ARINC 623 ACARS(Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System) is available at some air traffic centres. • This is a transitional step to data link using VDL mode 2 and the ATN as proposed in the LINK 2000+ programme.

  10. VDL Mode 3 (experimental system)

  11. Controller pilot data link communication (CPDLC) • is a means of communication between controller and pilot, using data link for ATC communication. At the highest level, the concept is simple, with the emphasis on the continued involvement of the human at either end and the flexibility of use. • The CPDLC application provides air-ground data communication for the ATC service. This includes a set of clearance/information/request message elements which correspond to voice phraseology employed by Air Traffic Control procedures.

  12. The controlleris provided with the capability to issue level assignments, crossing constraints, lateral deviations, route changes and clearances, speed assignments, radio frequency assignments, and various requests for information. • The pilotis provided with the capability to respond to messages, to request clearances and information, to report information, and to declare/rescind an emergency, to request conditional clearances (downstream) and information from a downstream Air Traffic Service Unit (ATSU). • A “free text” capability is also provided to exchange information not conforming to defined formats. An auxiliary capability is provided to allow a ground system to use data link to forward a CPDLC message to another ground system.

  13. Primary functions of the CPDLC : • the exchange of controller/pilot messages with the current data authority, • the transfer of data authority involving current and next data authority, • downstream clearance delivery with a downstream data authority.

  14. Main implementations of CPDLC: • The System was originally developed by Boeing, and later adopted by Airbus, is primarily used in oceanic routes. It was originally deployed in the South Pacific in the late 1990s and was later extended to the North Atlantic. FANS-1/A mainly uses satellite communications provided by the Inmarsat Data-2 (Classic Aero) service. • ATN/CPDLC system is operational at Eurocontrol's Maastricht Upper Airspace Control Centre and has now been extended by Eurocontrol's LINK2000+ Programme to many other European FIRs. The VDL Mode 2 networks operated by ARINC and SITA are used to support the European ATN/CPDLC service. The Maastricht UAC, controlling the upper airspace of Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands is currently still the only air traffic control centre in busy central European airspace.

  15. Uplink Messages

  16. Emergency Messages • The emergency page provides access to a number of message selections. The DIVERT TO message defaults to the destination, but can be changed to an alternative landing point. • If selected, the downlink element DIVERTING TO [position] VIA [route clearance] is added to the emergency message. If entered by the pilot, ie. if the destination is other than flight planned, then the [route clearance] variable is likely to be DCT (direct) until otherwise advised. • If the pilot's altitude bug is set to a level that is below a tolerance from the current level, the downlink element DESCENDING TO [] is automatically added to the emergency message.

  17. Emergency Messages • SOB relates to the fuel remaining and the Souls On Board the aircraft. Both values are "known" by the FMS at any one time. The downlink element [remaining fuel] OF FUEL REMAINING AND [remaining souls] ON BOARD is automatically added to the emergency message. • Downlink messages require that the pilot verifies the report on the VERIFY page prior to sending. • The verify page also provides the pilot with access to free text elements. In the case of an emergency message, the free text element automatically has an "urgency" delivery attribute. This is the only time that the pilot has access to the urgency free text attribute.

  18. Downlink Altitude Request • The ATC Request page provides the pilot with access to a number of downlink request message categories.For a level request, an option to reach the requested level via a cruise climb is available. The pilot canalso choose to append one of a number of elementsto amplify the request, suchas DUE TO PERFORMANCE,DUE TO WEATHER, or AT PILOT'S DISCRETION. Once the message has been constructed, it must be viewed on the VERIFY page prior to sending.

  19. Satellite

  20. Concept of air/ground data communications

  21. Differences in service area

  22. Concept of aeronautical satellite communications system Ground earth station

  23. ARINC Specifications • Much of the processing performed by the CMU as well as basic requirements of the hardware are defined by ARINC specifications. The following is a list of the major ARINC specifications that define standards that govern many aspects of ACARS systems: • ARINC 607 Design Guidance for Avionics Equipment. Includes definition of Aircraft Personality Module (APM), required for ARINC 758 CMU installation. • ARINC 429 Specification for receiving and broadcasting broadcast data (data transfer between avionics LRU s). It is the one way communication data bus • ARINC 618 Defines the air / ground protocols for communicating between the ACARS / CMU and VHF ground systems. Also defines the format of the ACARS messages sent by the ACARS / CMU as well as received by the ACARS CMU. The format of this message is called a Type A message. This characteristic has been updated to define the future VDL Mode 2 AOA operation. • ARINC 619 Defines the protocols for the ACARS / CMU to use to transfer file data between other avionics in the aircraft. ARINC 619 covers file protocols that are used to interface with FMS, FDAMS, Cabin Terminal, Maintenance Computers, SATCOM systems and HF Voice Data Radios. • ARINC 620 Defines ground-to-ground communication protocols. This includes the message format of messages routed between a service provider and an airline or other ground system. This is referred to as a Type B message (the air/ground Type A message is reformatted to a Type B message for ground transmissions). • ARINC 622 Describes the processing associated with sending ATC application messages over today’s ACARS links (including ARINC 623 ATC messages).

  24. ARINC Specifications • ARINC 623 This characteristic identifies ATC related messages that can be generated or received by an ACARS MU / CMU system (does not include FANS-1 or FANS-A messages that are processed by the FMS) • ARINC 629 Specification for receiving and broadcasting (data transfer between avionics LRUs). ARINC 629 was introduce to use on B777 commercial airplane. ARINC 629 is the two ways communication data bus (one pair of data bus is use for transmit and receive data). • ARINC 631 Specification for VHF Digital Link (VDL) MODE 2. This specification provides general and specific design guidance for the development and installation of the protocols needed to exchange bit-oriented data across an air-ground VHF Digital Link (VDL) in an Open System Interconnection (OSI) environment. • ARINC 724B Specification for an ACARS MU for ARINC 724B wiring. • ARINC 739 Specification for interfacing with Multi-purpose Cockpit Display Units • ARINC 740 ARINC 744 Specification for interfacing to cockpit Printers. • ARINC 758 Specification for a CMU relative to ARINC 758 wiring. This specification actually identifies various levels of functionality, these defining future growth phases for the CMU. Initial CMU systems which perform today’s ACARS functions are classified as Level OA. • ARINC 823 Two-part specification that defines a security framework for protecting ACARS datalink messages exchanged between aircraft and ground systems. Security services include confidentiality, data integrity, and message authentication. Part 1, ACARS Message Security (AMS), specifies the security protocol, and Part 2, Key Management, specifies life-cycle management of the cryptographic keys necessary for secure and proper operation of AMS.

More Related