1 / 67

802.11 TGmb Editor Report - Sept 2010

802.11 TGmb Editor Report - Sept 2010. Authors:. Date: 2010-09-13. Abstract. This document summarises editorial activities on the TGmb Draft since the last meeting Status of Draft Status of comments E-Motions

tonymoore
Download Presentation

802.11 TGmb Editor Report - Sept 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 802.11 TGmb Editor Report - Sept 2010 Authors: Date: 2010-09-13 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  2. Abstract • This document summarises editorial activities on the TGmb Draft since the last meeting • Status of Draft • Status of comments • E-Motions • This document is cumulative – i.e., it will be revised per meeting to show updated status. Historic data is shown at the end of the file. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  3. Sept 2010 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  4. Balloting Status Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  5. LB167 Comments • Note, one of the “part of a no vote=Y” comments was from a yes voter. He later submitted an exact duplicate of this comment marked editorial, “part of a no vote=N”. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  6. LB167 Status (as of 2010-09-10) • The 7 Unresolvable comments were withdrawn by the commenters. • The 9 Principle comments were given the response “AGREE IN PRINCIPLE (EDITOR: 2010-08-23 09:35:14Z) - This comment is deemed editorial and delegated to the document editor for consideration in developing future drafts. Please note that the IEEE standards are edited professionally prior to publication.” Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  7. REVmb Draft Numbering History (part) • D1.0, 2009-05 – balloted as LB149 • D2.0, 2009-12 – completion of LB149 edits. Balloted version. • D2.01, 2010-01 – roll-up of 802.11n • D2.02, 2010-01 – speculative editing of LB160 editorial comments • D2.03, 2010-02 – Comment resolutions from Jan 2010 • D2.04 – Defect resolution from D2.01-D2.03 + speculative editing of MIB changes in 11-10/0216r2 • D3.0 – balloted as LB162 • D3.01 – speculative editing of LB162 editorials • D3.02 – editing of LB162 technical • D4.0 – for ballot • D4.01 – Speculative editing of LB163 editorials • D5.0 – for ballot • D6.0 – for sponsor ballot, includes MEC change Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  8. LB167 Documents • REVmb DRAFT (members’ area of 802.11 website) • Draft P802.11REVmb_D6.0.pdf • Draft P802.11REVmb_D6.0 Redline.pdf • Composite comments (all ad-hocs) • 11-09-0706-18-000m-revmb-wg-ballot-comments.xls • Comments assigned to / held by editor • For: resolution, editing or other action • 11-09-0956-09-000m-revmb-wg-ballot-editor-comments.xls • Relevant tabs: “Ready for motion Sept 2010” and “Withdrawn” Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  9. MEC • Draft 5.0 was reviewed by IEEE-SA editorial staff as a mandatory editorial coordination (MEC) • See document 11-10/1070r0 for full text of their report • The outcome is that we have to change the draft’s scope and purpose statements to match those of the P802.11 PAR before starting sponsor ballot. • D6.0 contains these changes, and is on the server. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  10. Rolling in 802.11p • I rolled in 802.11p into D5.0, resulting in a D5.01 (unpublished). • This was reviewed by the editorial panel, and was in a fit state to post. However, it was not posted because of the ongoing MEC. • The changes for MEC and the changes for .11p will need to be merged to produce a D6.01. • There is no time urgency on posting this document, and it should not be posted before the end of initial sponsor ballot to avoid confusing the voters. • The merge should be an easy matter because changes for the MEC were confined to clause 1. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  11. Meeting the terms of our conditional approval • See document 11-10/0801r3 • We have met the terms of our conditional approval • No new disapprove comments • No new disapprove votes • We are not required to recirculate D5.0, because we have no disapprove comments, after withdrawal of the 7 disapprove comments. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  12. Sponsor Ballot prep • D6.0 will be the version balloted • Have checked with IEEE-SA editorial staff that the changes we made meet their approval • The 802.11 CAC discussed at length whether D6.0 should be recirculated (because of the changes to purpose), and concluded it did not (Straw poll in CAC “are changes editorial?” result: 15,0) • Sponsor ballot pool for P802.11 finishes on 14th September 2010. • There are currently 184 people in the pool • Academic 16  8.7% • General Interest 56  30.4% • Government/Military 7  3.8% • Producer 71  38.6% • User 34  18.5%   184  100.0% Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  13. E-Motions Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  14. Motion - LB167 comments • Approve comment resolutions in 11-09/0956r9 on the “Ready for motion Sept 2010” tab • Stephens/ Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  15. July 2010 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  16. REVmb Draft Numbering History (part) • D1.0, 2009-05 – balloted as LB149 • D2.0, 2009-12 – completion of LB149 edits. Balloted version. • D2.01, 2010-01 – roll-up of 802.11n • D2.02, 2010-01 – speculative editing of LB160 editorial comments • D2.03, 2010-02 – Comment resolutions from Jan 2010 • D2.04 – Defect resolution from D2.01-D2.03 + speculative editing of MIB changes in 11-10/0216r2 • D3.0 – balloted as LB162 • D3.01 – speculative editing of LB162 editorials • D3.02 – editing of LB162 technical • D4.0 – for ballot • D4.01 – Speculative editing of LB163 editorials Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  17. Balloting Status Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  18. LB163 Comments Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  19. LB162 Status (as of 2010-07-02) Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  20. Process for D4.01 • D4.01 speculative editing of 40 editorial comments from LB163 • D4.01 is currently pending review by Peter and Mark. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  21. LB163 Documents • REVmb DRAFT (members’ area of 802.11 website) • Draft P802.11REVmb_D4.0.pdf • Draft P802.11REVmb_D4.0 Redline.pdf • Composite comments (all ad-hocs) • 11-09-0706-13-000m-revmb-wg-ballot-comments.xls • Comments assigned to / held by editor • For: resolution, editing or other action • 11-09-0956-08-000m-revmb-wg-ballot-editor-comments.xls Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  22. Historic Page Statistics of REVmb Note, drafts balloted (i.e. Dn.0) have editorial comments hidden. As of D2.0, this implies ~18 pages of hidden comment text. Resulting unreliable deltas are highlighted yellow. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  23. E-Motions Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  24. Motion - LB163 Editorials • Approve comment resolutions in 11-09/0956r8 on the “Editorials” tab • Stephens/ Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  25. “Go to ballot” Motion • Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from the first working group ballot on P802.11REVmb D4.0, • Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 5.0 incorporating these resolutions and, • Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11REVmb D5.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?” Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  26. May 2010 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  27. REVmb Draft Numbering History (part) • D1.0, 2009-05 – balloted as LB149 • D2.0, 2009-12 – completion of LB149 edits. Balloted version. • D2.01, 2010-01 – roll-up of 802.11n • D2.02, 2010-01 – speculative editing of LB160 editorial comments • D2.03, 2010-02 – Comment resolutions from Jan 2010 • D2.04 – Defect resolution from D2.01-D2.03 + speculative editing of MIB changes in 11-10/0216r2 • D3.0 – balloted as LB162 • D3.01 – speculative editing of LB162 editorials Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  28. Balloting Status Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  29. LB162 Comments Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  30. LB162 Status (as of 2010-05-12) Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  31. Process for D3.01 • D3.01 speculative editing of 19 editorial comments from LB162 • One of these comments (CID 3084) was subsequently transferred to GEN as it actually resolves some technical ambiguities in D3.0. However these speculative edits are present in D3.01, tagged with this CID. • One of the 20 editorial comments (CID 3124) was not resolved, and was transferred to MAC. Having made this transfer, I have prepared a resolution to this comment in one of my submissions. • D3.01 is currently pending review by Bill, Peter and Mark. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  32. LB162 Documents • REVmb DRAFT (members’ area of 802.11 website) • Draft P802.11REVmb_D3.0.pdf • Draft P802.11REVmb_D3.0 Redline.pdf • Composite comments (all ad-hocs) • 11-09-0706-11-000m-revmb-wg-ballot-comments.xls • Comments assigned to / held by editor • For: resolution, editing or other action • 11-09-0956-06-000m-revmb-wg-ballot-editor-comments.xls • Editorials (18) – from LB162 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  33. Historic Page Statistics of REVmb Note, drafts balloted (i.e. Dn.0) have editorial comments hidden. As of D2.0, this implies ~18 pages of hidden comment text. Resulting unreliable deltas are highlighted yellow. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  34. E-Motions Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  35. Motion - LB162 Editorials • Approve comment resolutions in 11-09/0956r6 on the “Editorials” tab • Stephens/ Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  36. “Go to ballot” Motion • Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from the first working group ballot on P802.11REVmb D3.0, • Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 4.0 incorporating these resolutions and, • Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11REVmb D4.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?” Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  37. March 2010 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  38. REVmb Draft Numbering History (part) • D1.0, 2009-05 – balloted as LB149 • D2.0, 2009-12 – completion of LB149 edits. Balloted version. • D2.01, 2010-01 – roll-up of 802.11n • D2.02, 2010-01 – speculative editing of LB160 editorial comments • D2.03, 2010-02 – Comment resolutions from Jan 2010 • D2.04, pending – Defect resolution from D2.01-D2.03 + speculative editing of MIB changes in 11-10/0216r2 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  39. Process for D2.04 • D2.01 contains the roll-up of .11n • D2.02 contains editing of ~50 editorial comments from LB160 • D2.03 contains editing of 126 technical comments approved in Jan 2010 • D2.01-D2.03 were reviewed • 171 defects were reports (mostly from D2.01) • Thank you to my reviewers: Stephen McCann, Jon Rosdahl, Kaberi Banerjee, Sudheer Grandhi, Mark Hamilton, Amit Bansal, Yuichi Morioka, Eldad Perahia, George Vlantis, John Ketchum, Gary Anwyl, Michael Montemurro, Matthew Gast. • D2.04 is pending review by Peter Ecclesine Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  40. LB160 Documents • REVmb DRAFT (members’ area of 802.11 website) • Draft P802.11REVmb_D2.03.pdf • + Redlines between D2, D2.01, D2.02 • Composite comments (all ad-hocs) • 11-09-0706-09-000m-revmb-wg-ballot-comments.xls • Comments assigned to / held by editor • For: resolution, editing or other action • 11-09-0956-04-000m-revmb-wg-ballot-editor-comments.xls • Recycled comments for review (11) • MIB (2) • LB160 Editorials (50) Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  41. Recycled comments for review • 6 implemented as specified • CIDs 2220, 2181, 2006, 2007, 2023, 2010 • 2220: conflict with .11n • 2181: response incomplete • 2006 & 2007: dot11PHYdot11TempType • 2023: MIB description conflict • 2010: missing deprecation reason • 3 implemented in modified form • CIDs 2030, 2076, 2075 • 2030: conflict with .11n • 2076 & 2075: response non-responsive and ambiguous • 2 not implemented at all • CIDs 2011, 2061 regarding dot11TempType Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  42. WG Ballot 160 Comments Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  43. Status by ad-hoc – 2010-03-05 (summary) Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  44. Historic Page Statistics of REVmb Note, drafts balloted (i.e. Dn.0) have editorial comments hidden. As of D2.0, this implies ~18 pages of hidden comment text. Resulting unreliable deltas are highlighted yellow. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  45. E-Motions Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  46. Motion - LB160 Editorials • Approve comment resolutions in 11-09/0956r4 on the “LB160 Editorials” tab • Stephens/ Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  47. Motion – MIB • Approve resolutions for comments 2214 and 2039 as shown in 11-10/0216r2 • Notes: • CID 2039 was previously resolved (Jan 2010). This submission proposes an alternative resolution. • Draft D2.04 was speculatively edited on the assumption that this motion passes. • Stephens/ Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  48. “Go to ballot” Motion • Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from the first working group ballot on P802.11REVmb D2.0, • Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 3.0 incorporating these resolutions and, • Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11REVmb D3.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?” Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  49. Historic Data • Slides from previous revisions of this document for • Jan 2010 • Nov 2009 • Sept 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  50. January 2010 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

More Related