1 / 7

Working Group 2A Self-Evaluation of Infrastructure Development Status

Addressing infrastructure development challenges and solutions, including expertise availability, political commitment, and international cooperation fostering. The self-assessment process and criteria need clarity for proper evaluation. Proposing solutions like comprehensive training programs, external consultants, and collaborative efforts for better assessment tools.

tonysilva
Download Presentation

Working Group 2A Self-Evaluation of Infrastructure Development Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Working Group 2ASelf-Evaluation of Infrastructure Development Status Difficulties and Solutions

  2. 2A Questions/Difficulties • Availability of expertise for self assessment • Political commitment • More detailed description within IAEA documents • Re-evaluation of 19 infrastructure issues should be periodically made • International cooperation should be fostered both bilateral and multilateral • Clear responsibilities should be defined

  3. 2A Questions/Difficulties 7. Consistency of three documents, (Milestones, Evaluation, Guidelines) needs to be assured. (NEPIO and others as well) 8. What is the optimal number of self evaluations? 9. Evaluation of infrastructure for mature nuclear power programs should also be encouraged. 10. There is a lack of available international experience to do the assessments 11. Objectivity of self evaluation needs to be ensured 12. Clear criteria of to determine status is needed, i.e, significant action needed, minor action needed and no action needed.

  4. 2A Questions/Difficulties 13. Economic and industrial capabilities for developing nuclear power program need to assured as well as ones for nuclear.

  5. 2A Needs/Solutions • Comprehensive training program for internal and external evaluators • Human resources continue to be needed • Generation of documentation for internal and external use (reports for public consumption) • External consultants should be considered for realistic assessment • International cooperation (sharing experiences, lessons learned) --- IAEA should facilitate

  6. 2A Needs/Solutions 6. Cooperation with neighbouring countries 7. Walk-through simulations (tabletop exercise as a part of workshop) 8. IAEA observers on self assessment 9. Milestones document is useful tool but only one tool 10. Action plans based on self assessment are needed

  7. 2A Needs/Solutions 11. Computer models for assessment assistance should be developed by IAEA.

More Related