1 / 67

“MUC” and Humics

“MUC” and Humics. “ Molecularly uncharacterized component”. “Geomolecules ” Or “GEO-MACRO-MOLECULES (GMM’s ). 1. What are they?. “Geomolecules ”. “ An organic molecule that does not exist (or originate) in a biological system”. “Geomolecules ”.

torie
Download Presentation

“MUC” and Humics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. “MUC”and Humics “Molecularly uncharacterized component”

  2. “Geomolecules”Or “GEO-MACRO-MOLECULES (GMM’s) 1. What are they?

  3. “Geomolecules” “An organic molecule that does not exist (or originate) in a biological system”

  4. “Geomolecules” “A molecule that does not exist (or originate) in a biological system” • Assumed to have originated due to abioticorganic reactions in the geosphere. • Some assumed properties: • Made up from biological-derived components. • Characterized by: • a) “randomness”- (relative to enzyme-derived structures) ie: structure controlled by organic chemistry, thermodynamics, not evolution/bio function.

  5. “Geomolecules” “A molecule that does not exist (or originate) in a biological system” Due to previous, defined classically by: A) Size (large MW), and B) Inscrutability (is that word?) ie: chemically unrecognizable structure 2. Due to (b) families are Operationally defined: often by characteristic solubility behavior or as the “leftovers” of a set of Molec-level techniques.

  6. Structures? So, you might ask- if this is the case, where did these pictures come from? 

  7. Answer: “cartoons” such as one at right come from from bulk and functional-level techniques • CHN data (elemental ratios constrain possible structures) • Spectroscopic data (in particular 13C NMR) • Acid –Base data- you can “titrate” acid groups. •  Thus, even though there is no “real” structure for GMM’s, pictures like the one at the right have seeped into the collective consciousness..

  8. Some Main MUC Classes • A) Kerogen • “The fraction of large chemical aggregates in sedimentary organic matter that is insoluble in solvents “ >90% of OM in rocks • Divided into 3 broad “Types”, based on bulk properties, and assumed sources: • Type-I “algal kerogen” - freshwater algal source • Type-II “liptinitic kerogen” – marine plankton • Type-III “humic kerogen” higher terrestrial plants (eg in coals) • .

  9. Recall the Van Krevelyn type diagrams

  10. Kerogen= stuff you cannot extract Source Rock “Bitumen” =stuff you can extract 13C solid-state NMR spectra after HF demineralization

  11. 2. Humics and Fulvics • “Humin”: the general term for MUC of soils/ rivers • A) Humics and Fulvic acids: Fractions of Humin- defined by variable solubility (and associated/ assumed size) • *Humic Acid: Soluble in weak base; insoluble in acid- assumed Larger MW • *Fulvic acid: Soluble in all conditions ( yellow-substance)- thought to be smaller MW.

  12. 2. Humics and Fulvics

  13. Fulvics: because are smaller and soluble, can more readily solve actual structures One “model structure” structure- based on collected average data

  14. Fulvics: Some real structures- from swanneee river fulvic- shown to come from tannin and terpinoid precursors

  15. Humics: NMR Spectra: note- far more complex than kerogen- lots of aromatic- but also lots of acid, comlex aliphatic, and oxygenated (or N) containing moities

  16. Humics: One“model” structure- based on collected average data

  17. So: Where does complex MUC come from? • So: Here is the Classical Creation Story- • Which has supported a whole series of assumptions • Underlying Observations: • Most organic matter is MUC : in soils, sediments and water are >50% uncharacterized. • 2. Recognizable structures occur: Lipid structures occur in rocks and petroleums that are recognizably biochemical in origin

  18. So: Where does complex MUC come from? Classical Creation Story Con’d Which has supported a whole series of assumptions 3. Progression of complexity: With depth in sediment cores relative abundances change in the order: (decreases) biochemicals fulvic acidhumic acidkerogen (accumulates) note: molecular weight increases to the right 4. Known condensation reactions -many reaction paths are well known that can cause condensations.

  19. Example: the Maillard Reaction The classic example: “browning reactions” * Ever leave a pan on the stove? many possible products • 1912: Louis Camille Maillard, describes Rx between proteins and carbos • In foods, Maillard Rx is well studied- responsible for changes in color, flavor, nutrition. • Question: Why not in the geosphere?

  20. “Chaque fois que je cuisine avec ma poêle, mon four ou que j'utilise mon barbecue, je provoque une réaction de Maillard “ Sapides: sapid = full of flavor

  21. Example: the Maillard Reaction “melanoidans”= the product of maillard Rx: insoluble brown pigmented products, which have variable structures, molecular weights and nitrogen content. Among many many final Products: Pentoses may further react with amines to give orange dye products, influencing the colour of the food.

  22. The Classical Heteropolycondensate Model:Based largely on assumption that prevous kinds of reactions occur off the stove, in the environment: • 1. Biopolymers (e.g. lignins, polysaccharides and proteins) are broken down microbially into reactive monomers (e.g. phenols, sugars and amino acids), a fraction (<1%) of which spontaneously “condense” to form heterogeneous GMMs (rest to CO2). • ( minor OC loss in polymerization steps) • 2. Condensation is progressive: • BPBMFAHAkerogen/humin • Some lipids are incorporated into kerogens/humin with minor changes in structure. • 4. Major Appeal: • a. explains failure at characterizations.

  23. Problems with the theory in “modern cycles” • little supporting evidence for fast condensation reactions or their “scrambled” products • 1. Few “new” compounds in degraded vs. original woods, leaves & plankton (ie, data support selective removal, not creation of new compounds)

  24. Problems with the theory in “modern cycles” • condensation would have to outcompete microbial degradation ! And yet depends on competitive biodegradation as a source of reactive metabolic intermediates • (suggests that bacterial metabolic efficiency must be very low, or near zero, to allow almost significant conversion of biopolymers to geopolymers deep in sediments (%OC profiles almost constant •  Accumulating evidence suggests that much “uncharacterized” OM is actually biochemical-

  25. II: Why are they important? Geomolecules

  26. Why are GMMs important? • 1. Back to the carbon cycle: • Kerogen is the major organic component of sedimentary rocks (~20% of all buried C- organic or inorganic). • * Unidentified OM is the major organic component of MOST large reservoirs

  27. BUT: In a typical deep-sea sediment only about 20% of TOC can be characterized molecularly: The other 80% of TOC is either: 1) macromolecules that are not readily broken down into molecules < 1000D 2) macromolecules that hydrolyze to unrecognizable molecules <1000D 3) Burnt biomass (Black Carbon) in the forms of char, charcoal, soot ("invisible").

  28. Why are GMMs important? • Humic substances are major organic forms in soil, sediment and natural waters, where they: • *affect soil structure and fertility • * form complexes with dissolved metals and attenuate light transmission in natural waters • * absorb nonpolar anthropogenic compounds such as PCB's, pesticides & PAHs • * And: constitute huge reservoirs of biologically active elements on land and in the ocean.

  29. Humics Nature's Humic Acid100% Organic “Liquid humic acid is a cost-effective way to add humus to your soil. Humic acid increases the efficiency of your fertilizers, transforms insoluble nutrients into useable ones, retards pathogenic fungi build-up, and stimulates microbial activity. “

  30. Fulvics: and of course, comes in “organic” form.. Can buy “fulvic acid” by the pint, quart or gallon for your hydroponic garden- to promote “uptake” of nutrients..

  31. Why are GMMs important? • Key player in understanding cycling and fates of many nutrients and pollutants: • Metals: Humics form complexes with dissolved metals and thus effect both bioavailablity of bio-important metals (eg iron) as well as transport of contaminants. • Hydrophobic molecules: Adsorb (partition) hydrophobic contaminants ( eg PCB, PAH, hydrocarbons) thus effect both bioavailablity of bio-important metals (eg iron) as well as transport of contaminants.

  32. Example: Degree of Organic Speciation in metals • Strongly hydrolyzable species (with low solubility) would be expected to have a higher % organic speciation • EG estimates of % organic-bound: • Cd: 20-80% • Cu: 80-99.99% • Fe: >99.9% • Pb: 36-98%

  33. Why do they bind? • 1. Carboxylic acids Groups All soluble GMM’s (ie humics) are by definition loaded with carboxylic acid groups. Or they wouldn’t be soluble.. • 3) Electron density in Carboxylic acids are “perfect” to bind certain classes of metals really well • (recall “Hard, medium and soft metals and ligands” from inorganic chem class- basically a shorthand expression of density of electrons in outer shell) • Ba2+<Sr2+<Ca2+<Mg2+<Mn2+<Fe2+<Co2+<Ni2+<Cu2+>Zn2 • estimates of % organic-bound to COOH, based on “softness”

  34. Model organic ligands Question: are there certain natural-product ligands made to bind up Fe? Probably Yes: Eg: Model Organic Ligands Witter et al. 2000 Marine Chemistry * COOH groups = key function for binding metals.

  35. Note Similarity:

  36. Non-Polar Organics: Humics act as “carriers”- important in transport and partitioning. • Why? • “like dissolves like” chem 101. Typically simple question of equilibrium partitioning (ie similar polarity) • ( THUS humics, in theory , are sort of like giant natural detergents..)

  37. Why are GMMs important- III? “BLACK CARBON” • “ Black-Carbon” ~ soot • = are hypothesized “new” form of carbon soil, sediment and natural waters. • - Operationally defined- thought to be produced by biomass burning- naturally as well as anthropogenically- and possibly also in deep ocean sediments (heated..)

  38. “BLACK CARBON”

  39. “BLACK CARBON” Thought to be highly condensed aromatic rings- almost “invisible” to solids state CPMAS NMR- and because large and insoluble- also to other techniques!

  40. “BLACK CARBON” Formation monitored via NMR Thermal degradation (“Charring”)- no oxygen- experiment on wood 500C, under N2

  41. Importance of Black Carbon • 1) Contaminant cycling: expected to adsorb (partition) aliphatic hydrocarbons even better than humics (eg: PAH’s) ( think of charcoal resins in water filters) • “Invisible” part of C –Cycle? May be important, but not recognized part of carbon cycle. • IF important and unaccounted for.. Screws up many your analyses..

  42. III: How do you analyze for them? Geomolecules

  43. In sum: large fraction of OM in sediments, soils, and DOM is “MUC”. What to do? • 1. Develop new methods to characterize MUC: for example, find reactions (in addition to hydrolysis) to break down MUC and identify the pieces (eg, maldi-toffs, etc). • 2. Physically isolate MUC by selectively removing the mineral matrix (eg: "demineralization with HF + NMR, or ultrafiltration- various other schemes."). • Or of course: • 3. Just cop out! (the historic method of choice). By: • defining MUC as being structurally inscrutable, • giving various MUC solubility classes some “icky” names and • making up some creation stories to explain their existence

  44. The issue of Molecular Techniques for Geomolecules: How do you analyze this?

  45. Problems: 1 The Size issue • The Contemporary Analytical window has a "blind spot" between ~104 and 107 daltons (amu) • At one end: Microscopic analyses can be misleading or useless below about 1uM for organics (eg, mostly formless “stuff”). • 2. At the other: Most molecular-level analyses (as we saw previously) depend on separation of some kind- eg, HPLC/GC. This puts limitations on molecular size, based on volatility or solublity.

  46. The Size spectrum: (daltons)

  47. Bulk Character all we are left with? • 3. Bulk characterizations are (in principle) applicable over a huge size range (methane to mastodons), but are not very informative about details of molecular structure. •  AND (as we have seen) stories based on bulk ratios (and even functional ratios) can be very misleading.

  48. Can we break them apart in non-hydrolytic ways? Sort of. The dilemma: Condensed and complex structures, very difficult to break apart “cleanly”. a) Harsh chemical conditions often needed- destroys original structures. b) Structures present (or created) are largely unknown. result: difficult to know how to design a ML approach.

  49. Pyrolysis: Thermal Destructionidea: to blow up molecule, making it amenable to GC, GC-MS, yet preserve the maximum structural information possible. • Mechanism Analogous to MS •  Information from Fragments

  50. pyrogram:

More Related