90 likes | 256 Views
The political context of democratic engagement for people with disabilities. ARCH Disability Law Centre 30 th Anniversary Celebratory Symposium “Human Rights for People with Disabilities: Today and Tomorrow” Toronto, December 13, 2010 Michael J. Prince . Questions.
E N D
The political context of democratic engagement for people with disabilities ARCH Disability Law Centre 30th Anniversary Celebratory Symposium “Human Rights for People with Disabilities: Today and Tomorrow” Toronto, December 13, 2010 Michael J. Prince
Questions • What is civic engagement? • What is our current context in terms of challenges and possibilities? • What are the prospects for democratic engagement by people with disabilities?
Citizen-oriented: Participation of individuals as particular persons or family members or voters Two-way dialogues between the state and non-aligned persons, “ordinary citizens” via deliberative processes Community-based: Participation of organizations for individuals, families, groups and networks Forging structural linkages within the movement and with various state locations and policy processes Types of civic engagement
For governments: Acquire information Dispel myths Enhance credibility of policy or service Strengthen public trust in state structures and actors Leverage resources Be seen listening For community: Expand inclusion Generate experiences Transform stereotypes of people with disabilities Advance reform agenda ideas Build civic capacity Foster sense of citizenship Benefits of civic engagement
Risks of engagement • Cooptation/incorporation by the state • Fragmentation of the disability movement • Displacement of other important activities or issues for a group or sub-sector of the disability community • Legitimating individualistic or bio-medical notions of disablement • Being labelled as “special interests”
Context: challenges • High and persistent rates of poverty • Ambivalent public attitudes and support • Complex and uneven disability movement • Fiscal restraint by governments • Weak memories and policy capacities in public services • Unrepresentative organizations in staff • Belated and scripted consultations
Context: prospects • Provincialization of social policy • Anti-poverty strategies in several provinces • Accessibility/Inclusion legislation (Manitoba, New Brunswick, Ontario, Québec) • UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (Article 29 – participation in political and public life) • Recent reports on social policy reforms • Outreach efforts by election offices
The importance of being engaged • Acting upon our democratic rights as citizens • Building momentum and solidarity within the disability community • Creating alliances with other social movements and collectivities with shared values and goals • Drawing notice, in public spaces, to inequalities, obstacles, and unmet basic needs • Enhancing policy and program claims for inclusion and full citizenship
Thank you Michael J. Prince Lansdowne Professor of Social Policy Faculty of Human and Social Development University of Victoria mprince@uvic.ca Disabling Poverty and Enabling Citizenship CURA http://www.ccdonline.ca/en/socialpolicy/poverty-citizenship