1 / 14

New Student Services Presentation July 19 th , 2013

New Student Services Presentation July 19 th , 2013 . Melissa Overcash and Jared Bates, PhD. Topics of Discussion. Continuous Improvement Teacher-Leader Evaluation (TLE) Training Status ODCTE Project Charters Lottery Grant. Continuous Improvement - TCTW. Sponsored by the SREB

tovi
Download Presentation

New Student Services Presentation July 19 th , 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. New Student Services PresentationJuly 19th , 2013 Melissa Overcash and Jared Bates, PhD

  2. Topics of Discussion • Continuous Improvement • Teacher-Leader Evaluation (TLE) Training Status • ODCTE Project Charters • Lottery Grant

  3. Continuous Improvement - TCTW • Sponsored by the SREB • 17 Technology Centers are involved in this initiative • Students are assessed for reading, math, and science every two years • Workshops in data interpretation and analysis will be offered this year • Variables evaluated include • High Expectations • Numeracy • Literacy • Challenging Science Curriculum • HSTW Curriculum • Integrated Academics • Help • Timely Guidance • Importance of High School • Quality CT Studies

  4. Continuous Improvement-TCTW

  5. Continuous Improvement-Model Schools • Model Schools • Comprehensive support program for schools • Purpose of the program is to assists schools in their efforts to improve student achievement • Six Technology Centers are a part of this initiative

  6. Continuous Improvement-Model Schools • Daggett System for Effective Instruction • Organizational Leadership • Creating a culture • Establishing and aligning vision with organizational structure • Building Leadership • Instructional Leadership • Higher Expectations • Align curriculum standards • Integrate literacy and math • Teaching • Rigorous and relevant instruction and expectations • Build strong relationships with students

  7. Continuous Improvement - CSI • Continuous School Improvement (CSI) • Statewide committee that meets to discuss current issues • Sounding board for Dr. Sommers • Enables him to get field input • Meet quarterly

  8. Teacher Leader Effectiveness • Teacher Model • Tulsa Model Training • CTE Train the Trainer • 5 required days completed throughout the year • Partnered with Career & Academic Connections leadership and field staff to develop Guidance Rubric • Student Services Rubric planned for 2013-14 • Leader Model • McREL Training • 2 days required training completed • 1 day follow up for 2013-14, October 28 at Moore Norman

  9. ODCTE Project Charters • Certification • Instructional – LaMeciaStidham • Administrator – Karen Skidmore • Initial Steps of Certification • Step 1: Develop the list of skill sets for each group • Instructor – utilizes SREB research as the foundation • Administrator – utilizes National Policy Board for Educational Administration (NPBEA) • Step 2: Identification of present process for both certifications • Step 3: Proposed new process for both certifications

  10. ODCTE Project Charters • Accreditation – Dawn Lindsley • Begin to develop a new process based on Baldrige Criteria • Competency-based • Based on student success • Not based on minimum standards • Used for improvement • Intention is to pilot the 2014-2015 school year • Will be tied to performance measures being developed by the CareerTech Superintendents

  11. ODCTE Project Charters • Instructional Framework • We are moving away from hours • Moving toward course-based competencies

  12. Lottery Grant • $1.63 million distributed to 17 tech centers in FY13 • Max of $150,000 per school district • Criteria based on 8 categories: • General Description • Improved Student Learning • Innovation • Implementation in Career Clusters • Projected Added Enrollment • Project Value • Budget Submission • Proper Grammar, Punctuation, and Formatting

  13. Lottery Grant • 15 points per category • 120 total points may be received • -20 points if the technology center has received the award in the last 2 years • 0 points if the technology center has received the award last year • +10 points if the technology center did not receive an award last year • +20 points if the technology center did not receive an award in the last two years • No more than one award per school per year • Late submissions are not accepted

  14. Examples of Lottery Funding in FY12, FY13, and FY14 • Virtual welders – Metro Tech, Tri-County, Moore-Norman • SimMan – Central Tech, High Plains, Indian Capital, Northeast, Northwest, Canadian Valley, Pioneer, Autry, Wes Watkins • iPads, iPad-based curriculum, or tablets– Gordon Cooper, Pontotoc, Pioneer, Wes Watkins, Chisholm, Central • Alternative Energy – Autry, Canadian Valley, Francis Tuttle, Northeast • Aviation Technology – Mid-Del • Cyber Security – Great Plains, Meridian

More Related