1 / 42

Saving Strangers Case Study: Iraq 1991

Saving Strangers Case Study: Iraq 1991. Choi , Jin Takada, Chika Moon , Young Joo. Historical Overview. 1979 Iranian Revolution 1980 Iran-Iraq War ~ 1988 ceasefire 1990 Gulf War ~ 1991 ceasefire 1991 Uprisings in Iraq. Iran-Iraq War(1980-1988).

tovi
Download Presentation

Saving Strangers Case Study: Iraq 1991

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Saving Strangers Case Study: Iraq 1991 Choi, Jin Takada, Chika Moon, Young Joo

  2. Historical Overview 1979 Iranian Revolution 1980 Iran-Iraq War ~1988 ceasefire 1990 Gulf War ~1991 ceasefire 1991 Uprisings in Iraq

  3. Iran-Iraq War(1980-1988) • A long history of border disputes over the important channel for oil’s exports • Iraq first attacked Iran via air, taking advantage of the political and military mess in Iran.

  4. Iran-Iraq War(1980-1988) Iran Khomeini Iraq Hussein

  5. Iran-Iraq War(1980-1988) • Features and Structures • Shiite vs. Sunni • Persia vs. Arab • Intervening War to Islamic revolution by the Western countries and the neighbors • War ended with UN Security Council Resolution 598, which brokered a cease fire agreement between Iran and Iraq.

  6. Iran-Iraq War(1980-1988) • Al-Anfal Campaign (1986-1989): genocidal campaign against Kurds. • Destroyed 4500 Kurdish villages; rounded up and killed 100,000+ civilians, aerial bombing, chemical warfare; mass deportation (1million). • March 16,1988 - Halabja Chemical Attack • Ali Hassan al-Majid – aka “Chemical Ali” (Saddam’s cousin) • 14 chemical bombs (Cyanide, Mustard Gas, Nerve Gas) • instantaneously killed more than 5,000 people, 10,000+ injuries, and severe aftereffects until today

  7. Gulf War(1990-1991)

  8. Gulf War(1990-1991) Kuwait Iraq The UN Coalition from 34 nations

  9. Gulf War(1990-1991) • A quick and intensive war • Intervention was justified by UN and public because Iraqi violation of Kuwaiti territorial integrity • April 3, 1991: Saddam Hussein accepted the ceasefire agreement UNSC Resolution 687. Complied to the terms at the moment, but still held some military power under the ceasefire agreement.

  10. Uprisings in Iraq(1991) • 3-4 million Kurds in the northern Iraq • Shiites in the southern Iraq

  11. Uprisings in Iraq(1991) Triggered by: • Government Suppression: Constant brutal Iraqi repression of Kurds and Shiites (even after the 1974 decree; which guaranteed the autonomy of 4million Kurds living in northern Iraq) • Devastation by Iran-Iraq War • Assumption that the power of Saddam Hussein has weakened • Radio stations set up in Saudi Arabia by CIA, calling on people to overthrow Saddam Hussein • Feb 15,1991:Encouragement by Bush on radio (inciting a swift military coup to overthrow Saddam Hussein)

  12. Uprisings in Iraq(1991) • At one point, Kurdish rebels almost had control of northern Iraq and Shiites in south seized most of the major cities • Saddam Hussein quickly reorganized his forces and regained control of the country (transporting forces via helicopters) → Retributive/appalling attacks against civilians → Continued to attack Kurdish towns and villages with chemical weapons → 2 million refugees at mountains near the boarder of Turkey & Iran → 1,000 Kurds and Shiites died everyday

  13. Kurdish Genocide (1988-1991): • March 16, 1988 • Halabja Chemical Weapons Attack http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dj8wpeY47os

  14. Actions taken by the International Community: Initial Response • Unlike the Gulf War, where there was almost immediate response by the international community, there was no international rescue of the Kurds. No sanctions were imposed against Iraq and there was no authorization of international coalition. Gulf War ceasefire resolution (UNSC 687) contained nothing protecting the Kurds from Iraqi suppression. • April 2 and 4: Iran and Turkey brought in the issue before the Security Council. (fearing overflow of refugees)

  15. Actions taken by the International Community: Initial Response • Draft resolution submitted by France, Belgium, cosponsored by US and UK. • Informal consultations before voting on resolution 688: Humanitarian claims advanced by France for a ‘duty of intervention’ to protect the Kurds failed to secure support from other members of the Security Council, who feared it would weaken the non-intervention rule under Article 2(7). • However, it was apparent to many members of the Security Council that they had a responsibility to involve themselves in the humanitarian crisis inside Iraq. Central Question: Whether the Security Council could legitimately address the humanitarian concerns raised by Iraq’s repression without violating the ban on UN intervention in the ‘domestic jurisdiction’ of states in Article 2 Section 7.

  16. Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 7 • Members should not intervene in matters which are within the domestic jurisdiction of sovereign states. (The norm of non-intervention). • この憲章のいかなる規定も、本質上いずれかの国の国内管轄権内にある事項に干渉する権限を国際連合に与えるものではなく、また、その事項をこの憲章に基く解決に付託することを加盟国に要求するものでもない。但し、この原則は、第7章に基く強制措置の適用を妨げるものではない。

  17. Opposing Member’s Arguments Cuba, Yemen, Zimbabwe: • Supported Iraq’s claim that Security Council was acting in violation of Article 2(7) by intervening in Iraq’s internal affairs. Humanitarian crisis inside Iraq did not pose a threat to international peace and security. • Crisis posed problems for Iraq’s neighbors, but other organs of the UN, not the Security Council, had jurisdiction to deal with the humanitarian situation and overflow of refugees. • Draft resolution set a ‘dangerous precedent’ by circumventing the non-intervention rule.

  18. Supporting Member’s Arguments Austria, Belgium, Cote d’Ivoire, Ecuador, France, Romania, Soviet Union, UK, US, Zaire: • Transboundaryimplications of Iraq’s repression posed a threat to international peace and security, thus legitimating Security Council’s action. • However, anxious not to set a precedent that could be misused, members noted that Iraqi situation to be a special case in the aftermath of the Gulf War, and emphasized that Resolution 688 did not represent a weakening of their commitment to the non-intervention rule.

  19. Humanitarian Arguments UK and France: • Argued that Article 2 Section 7 did not apply to human rights because they were not essentially ‘domestic’ or within the domestic jurisdiction. • Violation of human rights are of international interest, or non-domestic, because it is a crime against humanity.

  20. UNSC Resolution 688 • April 5, 1991: UN Security Council Resolution 688 • Ten members supported (Austria, Belgium, Cote d’Ivoire, Ecuador, France, Romania, Soviet Union, UK, US, Zaire), three vetoed(Cuba, Yemen, Zimbabwe), and two abstained(China and India). • UNSC Resolution 688 insisted that Iraq allow humanitarian relief agencies to operate inside Iraq. • UNSC Resolution 688 DID NOT expressly authorize military enforcement action.

  21. April 11- Iraq was instructed not to send military forces north of the 36th parallel as ‘coalition officials would be operating in those areas to distribute humanitarian assistance to the Kurdish population’. ‘No-fly’ zone was set up over northern Iraq

  22. Actions taken by the International Community: Non-Action • Initially, forcible intervention was not an option for Member States (b/c of many political, economical reasons, and Article 2 (7)) • Having just taken forces out of Iraq, US and UK were reluctant to take action interfering with the ‘domestic’ affairs of Iraq. • Despite the fact that, the US found itself increasingly involved in the provision of relief to ensure Iraqi compliance with resolution 688. US feared a long-term commitment much like the Vietnam War. • April 12- President Bush still referring to situation as a “civil war” and “internal struggle” to deflect pressure to intervene; public opinion goes against him.

  23. Tipping Point/Crucial Turning Point • Sec of State Baker visits refugee camps; sees horrible conditions • Media Coverage:US/UK media brings attention to the problem and criticized Western governments for failing to rescue the Kurds. • Major (UK) and Bush (US): due to excessive media coverage they soon (just in 4days) changed their minds by providing armed protection for the Kurds inside northern Iraq.

  24. Actions taken by the International Community: April 16- Bush announces ‘Operation Provide Comfort’ Coalition forces (US: 5,000 UK: 2,000 France: 1,000 and Dutch forces) were deployed to set up six ‘safe havens’ in the north to protect the Kurds. Bush stressed the temporary nature of the operation by declaring that the ‘administration of and security for the sites’ would be handed over ‘as soon as possible to the United Nations’. Legality of ‘Operation Provide Comfort’ questioned because Resolution 688 DID NOT expressly authorize military enforcement action.

  25. Actions taken by the International Community: • April 18- Memorandum of Understanding between UN and Iraqi government; allows humanitarian organizations to enter and deliver aid. • May 2- (concerned about prolonged presence) Major suggests UN police force to take over for the coalition forces. • May 11- Iraqi government rejects UN police force idea initially. But soon agrees to getting rid of coalition forces for deployment of 500 UN guards. • Mid-July - Withdrawals of coalition forces begins (21,700); No Fly Zone remains • Residual force: “Operation Poised Hammer”

  26. [ACTION TAKEN BY THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY] • ‘No-fly’ zone was set up over northern Iraq and coalition forces were deployed to set up 6 ‘safe havens’ to protect the Kurds. One year later, southern no-fly zones were created to protect the persecuted Shiites in the south, but no safe havens were set up (‘Operation Southern Watch’).

  27. Legality of Action taken by the International Community: • Intervention was legitimated as being in conformity with humanitarian concerns but legality of action under the norm of non-intervention was questioned. • Coalition forces claimed Resolution 688 allowed them to use force to save the Kurds • Furthermore, subsequent Western plans replacing their forces with armed UN guards were publicly contested by UN and Soviet Union as exceeding the authority of 688. • Looking at the legality issue from the Solidarist/Counter-Restrictionist’s POV, Resolution 688 did give legitimate authority for Member States to intervene.

  28. Only exception to Article 2 Section 7:Chapter 7, Article 42 – Use of force • Should the Security Council consider that measures provided for in Article 41 [Sanctions] would be inadequate or have proved to be inadequate, it may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security. Such action may include demonstrations, blockade, and other operations by air, sea, or land forces of Members of the United Nations. • 安全保障理事会は、第４１条に定める措置では不十分であろうと認め、又は不十分なことが判明したと認めるときは、国際の平和及び安全の維持又は回復に必要な空軍、海軍又は陸軍の行動をとることができる。この行動は、国際連合加盟国の空軍、海軍又は陸軍による示威、封鎖その他の行動を含むことができる。

  29. UN Security Council Resolution 688: April 5, 1991. 1. Condemnsthe repression of the Iraqi civilian population in many parts of Iraq, including most recently in Kurdish populated areas, the consequences of which threateninternational peace and securityin the region;

  30. UN Security Council Resolution 688: April 5, 1991. 2. Demands that Iraq, as a contribution to removing the threat to international peace and security in the region, immediately end this repression, and in the same context express the hope that an open dialogue will take place to ensure that the human and political rights of all Iraqi citizens are respected:

  31. UN Security Council Resolution 688: April 5, 1991. 3. Insists that Iraq allow immediate access by international humanitarian organization to all those in need of assistance in all parts of Iraq and make available all necessary facilities for their operations.

  32. UN Security Council Resolution 688: April 5, 1991. 5. Also requests the Secretary-General to use all the resources at his disposal, including those of the relevant United Nations agencies, to address urgently the critical needs of the refugees and displaced Iraqi population; 6. Appeals to all Member States and to all humanitarian organizations to contribute to these humanitarian relief efforts;

  33. Central Question: Whether the Security Council could legitimately address the humanitarian concerns raised by Iraq’s repression without violating the ban on UN intervention in the ‘domestic jurisdiction’ of states in Article 2 Section 7. Answer: UNSC Resolution 688 contained the language of a threat to ‘international peace and security’ (the trigger word activating the enforcement provision of Chapter 7 Article 42), which invoked, not explicitly, the use of force under Chapter 7 Article 42 (the only exception to Article 2(7)).

  34. Failures of the International Community • Overall very successful – one of the most successful humanitarian intervention after the Cold War • Reasonably met the three objectives of saving the Kurds in northern Iraq: 1) bringing humanitarian aid to refugees dying on the mountains. 2) getting the Kurds down from the mountains and into the safe havens. 3) creating a security environment that made it possible for the Kurds to return to their homes

  35. Failures of the International Community 1. Failure of protecting the Shiites: • Southern NFZ came a year after, and no safe havens were created • The international community was only successful in establishing safe havens for the Kurds in northern Iraq. • They failed miserably not only to provide safe havens for the Shiites in southern Iraq but also failed to make air attacks to those Iraqi military forces shelling the Shiites. • The reasons for failure include mix of logistic and political reasons, and the greater population of the Shiites.

  36. Failures of the International Community 2. Failure of leaving Saddam Hussein in Power: • Overthrowing Saddam Hussein was not an objective of this humanitarian intervention but…. • At the end to the Gulf War, UNSC Resolution 687 allowed Saddam Hussein with some military power. The provision allowing him to use helicopters was one of the key reasons how he was able kill so many Kurds and Shiites and took control of the 1991 uprisings. • Saddam Hussein continued to threaten the international peace and security for the next 10+ years.

  37. Failures of the International Community 3. Abandonment of the Kurds and Shiites: • The CIA and Bush incited the Kurds and Shiites to rise up and overthrow Saddam Hussein • However, once the uprising started Bush referred to the situation as an “internal struggle” and did not intervene. • While 2 milliion refugees were up at the mountains and thousands of refugees were dying everyday. • The Kurds were rescued because Major and Bush realized that to leave them to their fate would be unacceptable in the eyes of public opinion.

  38. Conclusion under the Wheeler Criteria - Kurds

  39. Conclusion under the Wheeler Criteria - Shiites

  40. Situation in Iraq Today • 2003 Iraq War : War on Terrorism. Operation Iraqi Freedom – Saddam Hussein was overthrown. The Ba'ath Party was removed from power and multi-party parliamentary elections were held. Violence between Shiites and the Sunnis momentarily escalated • 2005 - Iraq elected its first Kurdish president, JalalTalabani • December 30, 2006 - execution of Saddam Hussein • 2007: the Article 140 of the 2005 Iraqi Constitution finally recognized the Kurdistan Region/Iraqi Kurdistan as a “federal entity” of Iraq. • October 11, 2011 – President Obama announces that all remaining U.S. troops would leave Iraq by the end of the year • Today: Almost daily explosions, suicide bombings, car bombs, etc. Violent conflicts between Sunnis and Shiites, and Kurdish territorial disputes still continue to be an ongoing problem.

  41. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7kkx9domJo Secretary of Defense 1989–1993 Dick Cheney Speech in 1992

  42. Thank you for listening!

More Related