260 likes | 554 Views
The CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS. What are some examples?. Indictable offence: serious criminal offences under Canada’s Criminal Code. Indictable offences. EXAMPLES: murder acts of terrorism robbery (over a certain amount) drug trafficking certain types of sexual assault violence.
E N D
What are some examples? Indictable offence:serious criminal offences under Canada’s Criminal Code
Indictable offences EXAMPLES: • murder • acts of terrorism • robbery (over a certain amount) • drug trafficking • certain types of sexual assault • violence
What are some examples? Summary offence:minor criminal offence under Canada’s Criminal Code
Summary offences EXAMPLES: • causing a disturbance • harassment (telephone calls- work) • Driving a motor vehicle without the owner’s permission • trespassing • communicating to obtain the services of a prostitute
Murder of Reena Virk Case Nov 14, 1997 Victoria, B.C. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oX0pjKkZaOQ
What: On 14 November 1997, 14 year old Reena Virk was swarmed and beaten by a group of 8 teenagers in Victoria, B.C., at the south end of the Craigflower Bridge. After the beating, bloodied and bruised, Virk made her way across the bridge to head home. Two of the original attackers, Warren Glowatski and Kelly Ellard, followed Virk to the other end of the bridge to assault her again. Ellard allegedly held Virk’s head under water for several minutes until she drowned.
The Facts: VICTIM • ReenaVirk’s body was found 8 days after she was beaten • She was 14 years old
The Facts • Kelly Ellard (15 years old at time of crime) • Accused of murdering ReenaVirk
The Facts • Warren Glowatski (16 years old at time of crime) • Accused of murdering ReenaVirk
The Facts • 6 girls (14-16 years old at time of crime) • Accused of assault causing bodily harm
Adversarial System JUDGE The CROWN (prosecution) Warren Glowatski: DEFENDANT
Adversarial System Two opponents: • CROWN vs. DEFENDANT (roles?) • PROSECUTION vs. DEFENCE • Each side will argue his/her case • Based on evidence, the “truth” will emerge
CIVIL LAW:What is meant by the cartoons? What is the tone of the cartoons?What does it say about Civil Law? Can you think of Civil law judges?