1 / 30

Advancing the Development of Digital Scholarship: SAT, CEH, and the DDB

Advancing the Development of Digital Scholarship: SAT, CEH, and the DDB. Charles Muller, Masahiro Shimoda, Kiyonori Nagasaki Center for Evolving Humanities, Graduate school of Humanities and Sociology, University of Tokyo

tracen
Download Presentation

Advancing the Development of Digital Scholarship: SAT, CEH, and the DDB

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Advancing the Development of Digital Scholarship: SAT, CEH, and the DDB Charles Muller, Masahiro Shimoda, Kiyonori Nagasaki Center for Evolving Humanities, Graduate school of Humanities and Sociology, University of Tokyo (Powerpoint file for this presentation available at:http://www.acmuller.net/articles/2011-03-31-SAT_DDB-AAS.ppt)

  2. Shortcomings in the Ongoing Development of Digital Scholarship: In General Joseph Raben: “Humanities Computing in an Age of Social Change,” Keynote Lecture, Digital Humanities, King’s College, 8th July 2010. http://www.arts-humanities.net/video/roberto_busa_award_lecture_joseph_raben_%E2%80%93_humanities_computing_age_social_change_dh2010

  3. Shortcomings in the Ongoing Development of Digital Scholarship: In General Joe Raben: “It seems ironic that the community of scholars dedicated to promoting wired access to the riches of the humanist tradition have so far failed to create a Wiki of their own activities. To rely on the imprecise algorythmic methods of Google, which is basically an advertising medium designed by computer engineers without any evident input from the scholarly community, scarcely seems like appropriate behavior for a group that prides itself on the minute accuracy of its own documents. . .“

  4. Shortcomings in the Ongoing Development of Digital Scholarship: In General “. . .And while Wikipedia probably contains a good deal of information regarding Digital Humanities, that information is so scattered among all the other types of information it contains, and is so subjected to random editing that it cannot be relied on for comprehensiveness, interconnectivity, or timeliness. A Wiki for humanities computing therefore, which could be called Digital Scholar, would provide many benefits to both the inner community itself, and the general world of scholarship. “

  5. Shortcomings in the Ongoing Development of Digital Scholarship: In General Scholarly Wikis, yes, but more than this is needed to improve the situation.

  6. Obstructions to the Ongoing Development of Digital Scholarship: In Japan Digital Humanities in Japan has its own shortcomings: A overall sluggishness in the acceptance of the digital medium in the humanities disciplines Lack of institutional recognition.

  7. Buddhist Studies as Leader: A Star in the Field Ironically, in North America, Europe, and Asia, since the early days of the WWWeb, the field of Buddhist Studies, normally associated with the oldest trappings of inertia in humanistic studies, has emerged as one of the leading forces in the digitization of scholarship. Spearheaded by canonical digitization projects.

  8. Efforts at the University of Tokyo SAT Taishō Database Project: Centered on the Taishō Canon, INBUDS database, and DDB, and now linking with numerous other projects worldwide through the RBIB. Center for Evolving Humanities (CEH). Academic unit at the University of Tokyo promoting digital scholarship through the development of a DH curriculum, seminars, symposia, workshops, and conferences, and support of young DH researchers.

  9. Aims of the SAT Project • To cooperate with various related projects in the field of Buddhist Studies • To resolve a range of problems from an approach that understands the methods of traditional humanities as well as humanities informatics. • Construction of a “Research Base for Indology and Buddhist Studies”

  10. Interoperability Digital Dictionary of Buddhism bibliographic database Web API INBUDS DDB SAT DB Character Ontology Multilingual Imager

  11. Type in 阿羅漢 (arhat) and search

  12. Select a page from the search results

  13. Located term 阿羅漢

  14. Select a portion of text Basic meanings from DDB, along with a link into the dictionary are generated

  15. DDB entry on Arhat

  16. Search for 阿羅漢 in the article database CiNii database information indicates the availability of a PDF

  17. PDF of article from CiNii

  18. The International Research Alliance INBUDS (Japan) SARDS (Germany) SARDS (Austria) Various other international projects International connection of basic research via hyperlink ITLR (Germany) SAT (Japan) DDB (Japan) Pali Canon (Thailand) International Buddhist Studies alliance Collected Works of Korean Buddhism (Korea) English Daizōkyō (Numata) 20

  19. RBIB Past Indological and Buddhist Research Revised texts and Tripiṭaka as result INBUDS (Japan) Single-dimensional data in the form of transcripts、images, music, film SAT (Japan) Legacy and Digitization SARDS (Germany) International connection of basic research via hyperlink Various other international projects DDB (International) International Buddhist Studies alliance Pali Canon (Thailand) Collected Works of Korean Buddhism (Korea) English translation of Daizōkyō ITLR (Germany) Storing Analyzing Digital Humanities research on evaluation Research on Media and Buddhism collaborative management Buddhist Research Base Next-Generation Humanities Next-Generation Buddhist Studies

  20. The Digital Dictionary of Buddhism [DDB]: A Model for the Sustainable Development of a Collaborative Scholarly Field-wide Web Reference Service 恕

  21. DDB Process of Development • 1986 – work initiated with book publication in mind. • 1995 – placed on web with approx. 2800 entries • 1995-2000 HTML hardlinked version (base files maintained in SGML then XML) • 2001 – "Beddow Version." Web delivery with Perl/XSL (approx. 5,000 entries)

  22. DDB Process of Development • 2002 – Completion of input of Soothill data (funded by JSPS), along with user contributions, raising the DDB content to 15,000 entries. • 2002-2011 – rapid addition of entries based on translation work and user input (esp. Karashima, Hodge, Sinclair, Foulk, Radich, Swanson, Chun, Lusthaus, plus scores of others). Entry total has reached 55,000 and continues to grow rapidly

  23. DDB Interoperation with SAT Database • 2008 – For the first time, the DDB was applied directly to an online textual database, based on the work of Kiyonori Nagasaki of IIDH. • 2008 – Reverse linking: based on documentation provided on the SAT web site, we were also able to link entries directly back into their locations in the Taishō via SAT.

  24. "DDB 2.0" • Fall 2010 – Michael Beddow completes radical rewrite of DDB and CJKV-E programming structure.

  25. Access and Collaboration • Guest user (5 searches per day). Policy developed gradually based on experience. • Full access (contribution—basic: 1 A4 page for two years of full access; or fee). • Success of the model is based greatly on devoting energy to making known the contributions of collaborators: node level, web site (Contributors), monthly newsletter, monthly data postings.

  26. Access and Collaboration • Institutional Subscriptions. More than 38 university libraries are now subscribed to the DDB/CJKV-E dictionaries, perhaps the greatest single validation of the acceptance of the project as scholarly resource.

  27. "CJKV-E 2.0" • We have received a three-year research grant for the purpose of expanding the coverage of the CJKV-E dictionary. We are making excellent progress, such that by the end of 2013, users will have access to a significantly larger lexicon for the study of classical Chinese texts.

  28. Thank you! 恕 • (Powerpoint file for this presentation available at:http://www.acmuller.net/articles/2011-03-31-SAT_DDB-AAS.ppt)

More Related