140 likes | 283 Views
4 | 2. Introduction. Policy-adoption entails action on a preferred alternative that can win approval, not necessarily choices between various full-blown policy alternativesAdoption gives policies the weight of public authority"Legitimacy. 4 | 3. Theories of Decision-Making. Rational-Comprehensive
E N D
1. CHAPTER FOUR Policy Adoption
2. 4 | 2 Introduction Policy-adoption entails action on a preferred alternative that can win approval, not necessarily choices between various full-blown policy alternatives
Adoption gives policies the weight of public authority
Legitimacy
3. 4 | 3 Theories of Decision-Making Rational-Comprehensive Theory
Not to be confused with rational choice
Specifies the procedures involved in making well-considered decisions that maximize the attainment of goals, whether personal or organizational
Subject to several criticisms
Decision-makers are not faced with clearly defined problems
Unrealistic in the intellectual demands placed on decision makers
Lack of time and resources necessary to evaluate all of the alternatives
4. 4 | 4 Theories (cont.) Incremental Theory
Limited changes or additions to existing policies
Easier to reach agreement between parties when only minor changes are made to existing programs
Sequences of incremental changes can result in fundamental changes in public policy
Criticisms
Too conservative and focused on existing order
Does not allow for crisis situations
Because of focus on past, it discourages searching for new or innovative alternatives that are readily available
5. 4 | 5 Theories (cont.) Mixed Scanning
Takes the best of rational-comprehensive and incremental theory; minimizes weaknesses of each
Provides high-order, fundamental policy-making processes which set basic directions and
incremental processes which prepare for fundamental decisions and work them out after they have been reached
Allows decision makers to use either rational-comprehensive or incrementalism depending on the circumstances of a given situation
6. 4 | 6 Decision Criteria Decision-making can be either individual or collective
Values
Organizational values Those who work for an agency for a long period of time will become true believers
Professional values Professionally trained people tend to carry the value preferences of their particular profession
7. 4 | 7 Decision Criteria (cont.) Values cont.
Personal values the urge to protect or promote ones own physical or financial well-being, reputation, or historical position
Policy values (public ideas) perceptions of the public interest; what is the right thing to do
Ideological values sets of coherent or logically related values and beliefs that present simplified pictures of the world and serve as guides to action
8. 4 | 8 Decision Criteria (cont.) Political-Party Affiliation
Party loyalty
Best predictor to how members of Congress will vote on legislative issues
Influences the decisions of federal judges
Constituency Interests
Delegate vs. Trustee vs. Politico
Agencies have constituencies comprised of interest groups
9. 4 | 9 Decision Criteria (cont.) Public Opinion
Public perspectives and viewpoints on policy issues that officials consider in making decisions
Shapes general boundaries & direction of public policy
Can be permissive
Deference
Deferring to the judgment of others who are more experienced
Other legislators, party leaders, committee chairs, policy experts
Decision Rules
Stare decisis
Per se
Committee rules
10. 4 | 10 Public Interest Normative term that can be tricky to define
Private interests and public interest are not always antithetical
Can be found in widely shared interests
Can also be found by looking at the need for organization and procedures to represent and balance interests, to resolve issues, to effect compromise on policy formation, and to carry public policy into effect
11. 4 | 11 Styles of Decision-Making Bargaining
Most common form of decision-making
Process where two or more parties in positions of power adjust their goals in order to formulate an acceptable (but not necessarily ideal) course of action for all involved
Explicit vs. Implicit bargaining
12. 4 | 12 Styles (cont.) Persuasion
The marshaling of facts, data, and information; the skillful construction of arguments; and the use of reason and logic to convince another of the correctness and wisdom of ones position
Command
The ability of those in superior positions to make decisions that are binding upon those who come within their jurisdiction
In practice, all three styles run together in decisional situations
13. 4 | 13 Majority Building in Congress Decentralization of power
Political parties in Congress are weak
Geographic representation and decentralized elections
Committee system
Because of decentralization and the complexities of procedures, majorities must constantly be cobbled together to enact important legislation
14. 4 | 14 Presidential Decision-Making Presidents are policy adopters in their own right
Executive Orders
Factors shaping presidential decision-making
Permissibility (legality)
Available resources
Available time
Previous commitments
Available information