120 likes | 251 Views
LOOKING ON GRADUATES EMPLOYABILITY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF UNIVERSITY BUSINESS COOPERATION. SAMO PAVLIN , UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA – COOPERATION BETWEEN HEI AND BUSINESSES - WHY DO WE NEED TO COOPERATE? CMEPIUS , LJUBLJANA 25. OKTOBER 2013.
E N D
LOOKING ON GRADUATES EMPLOYABILITY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF UNIVERSITY BUSINESS COOPERATION SAMO PAVLIN, UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA – COOPERATION BETWEEN HEI AND BUSINESSES - WHY DO WE NEED TO COOPERATE? CMEPIUS, LJUBLJANA 25. OKTOBER 2013 Emerging Modes of Cooperation between Private Sector Organisations and Universities (EMCOSU ) – "With the support of the Lifelong Learning Programme of the European Union"
LABOUR MARKET ORIENTATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION - Discourse on ‘employability’ and university-business cooperation – reflects two major policy pillars of HE labour market orientation; what is related to paradigmatic shifts in higher education: • fostering professional relevance of study programmes • ‘entrepreneurial‘ expectations from HE; • diversification of higher education programmes that often follow job specialisations; • internationalisation of teachers and students;
THE "EMPLOYABILITY" TENSION (TEICHLER & KEHM, 1995) • i) human capital approach that placesHE in the position of labour market, employment and “matching” policies in order to stimulate economic growth; and • ii) social demand approaches that favour freedom of choice, personal growth and equal opportunities… • … individual capabilities versus actual registered employment
SOME KEY DEVELOPMENTAL CHALLENGES RELATED TO HE & CAREER SUCCESS AFTER THE HEGESCO AND DEHEMS PROJECTS • What is a relative effect of personal characteristics, social backgrounds and education to career success? • What is the importance of fostering relevant work experiences? • How to developstudents’ motives and talents? • How demanding study should be? • How traditional teaching is combined with problem-based learning? • Howto improve assessment modes so they support acquisition of competncies? • How to manage tracer studies so they become an informative tool for HE stakeholders?
UNIVERSITY BUSINESS COOPERATION (UBC):THE EMCOSU PROJECT • Which are the most relevant modes of cooperation between universities and business, why and how are they interrelated? • What are the determinants of cooperation modes and their future developmental needs? • Which are the key developmental drivers and barriers to cooperation on the side of universities and business?
CONCEPTS RELATED TO UBC • “National innovation systems” (Nelson, 1993); • “New mode of knowledge production” (Gibbons et al., 1994); • “Entrepreneurial university” (Clark, 1998); • “The triple helix model” (Etzkowitz & Leydesdorff, 2000; Etzkowitz, 2008). • “Third mission” of universities – from teaching and research towards community engagement – via technology transfer, trans-disciplinarity, regional development and living laboratories (e.g. Trencher et al., 2013: 4).
CAREER SUCCESS AND UBC:WHAT SHALL BE SURVEYED? • How are factors of career success fostered by UBC? • How differentlyare HE stakeholders affected by UBC? (e.g. skill improvements), business (e.g. performance), society (e.g. improving the local environment) and academia (e.g. developing a personal network). • What are differencies between large multinational companies and best known universities in comparison to SMEs and NGOs? • Is UBC a smart developmental decision or economic necessity? • What are consequences of UBC for hybridisation of academic roles, and nature of academic certificates? • How UBC impact traditional functions of universites?
DRIVERS(DAVEY ET AL. 2011) • Commercial orientation of the university • Financial resources for working with universities • Flexibility of partner • Interest in accessing scientific knowledge • Employment by business of university staff and students • Short geographical distance of the university • Existence of mutual trust and commitment • Prior relations • Financial incentives
BARRIERS(DAVEY ET AL. 2011) • Lack of awareness of organisational research activities; • Lack of financial resources; • Current financial crises; • Bureaucracy within or external to the university; • The focus on producing theoretical results by universities • Differing motivation / values between university and business • Differing mode of communication and language between university and business • Differing time horizons between university and business