1 / 41

Neutron stars and quark matter Gordon Baym University of Illinois, Urbana

Neutron stars and quark matter Gordon Baym University of Illinois, Urbana 21 st Century COE Workshop: Strongly Correlated Many-Body Systems from Neutron Stars to Cold Atoms 19 January 2006. 東京大学. Cross section of a neutron star. Mass ~ 1.4 M sun Radius ~ 10-12 km Temperature

treva
Download Presentation

Neutron stars and quark matter Gordon Baym University of Illinois, Urbana

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Neutron stars and quark matter Gordon Baym University of Illinois, Urbana 21st Century COE Workshop:Strongly Correlated Many-Body Systems from Neutron Stars to Cold Atoms 19 January 2006 東京大学

  2. Cross section of a neutron star Mass ~ 1.4 Msun Radius ~ 10-12 km Temperature ~ 106-109 K Surface gravity ~1014 that of Earth Surface binding ~ 1/10 mc2 Mountains < 1 mm Density ~ 2x1014g/cm3

  3. Properties of matter near nuclear matter density Determine N-N potentials from - scattering experiments E<300 MeV - deuteron, 3 body nuclei (3He, 3H) ex., Paris, Argonne, Urbana 2 body potentials Solve Schrödinger equation by variational techniques 3 Two body potential alone: Underbind 3H: Exp = -8.48 MeV, Theory = -7.5 MeV 4He: Exp = -28.3 MeV, Theory = -24.5 MeV

  4. Importance of 3 body interactions Attractive at low density Repulsive at high density Various processes that lead to three and higher body intrinsic interactions (not described by iterated nucleon-nucleon interactions). Stiffens equation of state at high density Large uncertainties

  5. Energy per nucleon in pure neutron matter Akmal, Pandharipande and Ravenhall, Phys. Rev. C58 (1998) 1804 h p0i condensate

  6. Maximum neutron star mass 2.2M¯ Mass vs. central density Mass vs. radius Akmal, Pandharipande and Ravenhall, 1998

  7. Fundamental limitations of equation of state based on nucleon interactions alone: Accurate for n» n0. n À n0: -can forces be described with static few-body potentials? -force range » 1/2m => relative importance of 3 (and higher) body forces » n/(2m)3» 0.4n (fm3). -no well defined expansion in terms of 2,3,4,...body forces. Can one even describe system in terms of well-defined ``asymptotic'' laboratory particles?

  8. Well beyond nuclear matter density Onset of new degrees of freedom: mesonic, D’s (p-N resonance), quarks and gluons, ... . Properties of matter in this extreme regime determine maximum neutron star mass. Large uncertainties! Hyperons: S, L, ... Meson condensates: p-, p0, K- Quark matter in droplets in bulk Color superconductivity Strange quark matter absolute ground state of matter?? strange quark stars?

  9. もしほんの一つ二つクレイジーな仮定をすれば、もしほんの一つ二つクレイジーな仮定をすれば、 あなたは私の言動のすべてが正しいと解るよ。

  10. (1983) Solid state physics neutron stars? Low energy nuclear physics

  11. ??

  12. Phase diagram of quark gluon plasma 2nd order tricritical pt. 1st order Karsch & Laermann, hep-lat/0305025

  13. Normal Hadronic Color SC New critical point in phase diagram: induced by chiral condensate – diquark pairing coupling via axial anomaly Hatsuda, Tachibana, Yamamoto & GB, PRL 97, 122001 (2006) (as ms increases)

  14. Predictions of phase transition at finite  de Forcrand & Kratochvila hep-lat/0602024 Lattice gauge theory Effective (NJL) theories Ratti,Thaler,&Weise, nucl-th/0604025 Nf=2 Strong coupling qcd Kawamoto et al., hep-lat/0512023

  15. Onset of quark matter at low temperatures difficult to predict via lattice gauge theory. rc»5-10rnm Observations of massive neutron stars, M» 2M¯ => equation of state stiff, and central density so low that sharp transition to bulk quark liquid unlikely. Quark droplets in nuclear matter. Gradual onset of quark degrees of freedom.

  16. Quark Droplets in Nuclear Matter Glendenning; Heiselberg; Pethick, Ravenhall and Staubo Favorable to form negatively charged quark droplets nu~100, nd~ns~300, R~5fm Q~ -150|e| at lower densities than quark-hadron transition since they 1) reduce no. of electrons in matter 2) increase fraction of protons in nuclear matter Neutron stars likely to have such mixed phase cores, but results are very model dependent

  17. In fact, expect similar pasta phases of quark droplets: Structure, neutrino emissivity?

  18. Learning about dense matter from neutron star observations • Masses of neutron stars: equation of state • Glitches: probe n,p • superfluidity and crust • Cooling of n-stars: search for exotica • Burst oscillations: probe • nuclear physics to ~109g/cm3

  19. Infer masses from periods and Doppler shifts

  20. Dense matter from neutron star mass determinations Softer equation of state => lower maximum mass and higher central density Binary neutron stars » 1.4 M¯: consistent with soft e.o.s. Cyg X-2: M=1.78 ± 0.23M¯ Vela X-1: M=1.86 ± 0.15M¯ allow some softening PSR J0751+1807: M » 2.1 M¯ no softening QPO 4U1820-30: M » 2.2-2.3 M¯ challenge microscopic e.o.s.

  21. Measured neutron star masses in radio pulsars Thorsett and Chakrabarty, Ap. J. 1998 neutron star - neutron star binaries Hulse-Taylor M=1.35±0.04M¯ 1.18M¯ < M < 1.44M¯

  22. Measured neutron star masses in radio pulsars (from I. Stairs) Hulse-Taylor binary Possible path to compact binary system (Bart & Kalogera) NICE

  23. NEW BINARY PULSAR SYSTEM Lyne et al., Science 303, 1153 (2004) 22-ms pulsar J0737-3039A +2.7-sec pulsar J0737-3039B companion orbital period = 2.4 hours! Highly-relativistic double-neutron-star system See eclipsing of A by B Laboratory for gravitational physics!

  24. See orbit almost edge-on:

  25. Mass determinations: Stellar masses A=1.337(5)M¯ , B=1.250(5)M¯

  26. 1.4M¯ 1.4M¯ Vela X-1 (LMXB) light curves Serious deviation from Keplerian radial velocity Excitation of (supergiant) companion atmosphere? M=1.86 ± 0.33 (2s)M¯ M. H. van Kerkwijk, astro-ph/0403489 1.75M¯<M<2.44M¯ Quaintrell et al., A&A 401, 313 (2003)

  27. q PSR J0751+1807 3.4 ms. pulsar in circular 6h binary w. He white dwarf Nice et al., Ap.J. 634, 1242 (2005) Pulsar slowing down due to gravitational radiation: dP/dt = 6.4£10-14 Shapiro delay of signal due to gravitational field of companion: D t = - (2Gm2/c3) ln(1-cosq) q = angle between ns and wd seen by observer Measurements free (?) of uncertainties from possible atmospheric distortion in companion M=2.1M¯

  28. Additional physics that allows one to pin down the masses from D. Nice

  29. Neutron star (pulsar) - white dwarf binaries Nice et al., Ap.J. 634, 1242 (2005), Splaver et al., Ap.J 620, 405 (2005).

  30. Observations of white dwarf companion C. G. Bassa, van Kerkwijk, & Kulkarni, astro-ph/0601205 Companion is very red: Teff » 4000K. Implies w.d. has He or He-H atmosphere. Two mysteries: 1) Evolutionary models suggest companion should have hot (burning) H atmosphere. 2) The pulsar does not seem to heat the w.d. atmosphere. Absorbed and re-emitted radiation < 15%. Need more detailed observations of spectra of white dwarf

  31. Neutron-Star Low Mass X-ray Binaries

  32. Kilohertz quasiperiodic oscillations (QPOs) in accreting neutron stars Detected in ~ 25 neutron stars QPOs remarkably coherent (Q =n/dn ~ 30–200) Large amplitude Usually see 2 simultaneous kHz QPOs (never 3) Frequencies of the two QPOscan vary by hundreds of Hz in few hundred seconds, but Separation nQPO = nQPO2 -nQPO1of the two QPOs fairly constant ≈ nspin or ≈ nspin/2 Sco X-1 X-ray flux power density spectrumWijnands et al. (1998)

  33. innermost circular stable orbit (ISCO) in GR: R=6MG/c2 Strong evidence that higher frequency nQPO2 is the ISCO frequency, Then have direct measurement of neutron star mass: M*= c3/(63/2£ 2pnQPO2 G) =(2198/ nQPO2(Hz) )M¯ R* = c/(61/3£ 2pnQPO2) (Miller, Lamb, & Psaltis 1997) Ex.: QPO 4U1820-30, nQPO2 = 1170 Hz => M~ 2.2-2.3 M¯ Implies very stiff equation of state. Central density ~ 1.0 fm-3 ~ 6rnm

  34. hypothetical star: 1.8M¯, R=10km EXO0748-676: low mass x-ray binary thermonuclear burst source z=redshift of Fe and O lines M ' 2.1§ 0.28 M¯ R ' 13.8 § 1.8 km F. Özel, astro-ph//0605106

  35. Akmal, Pandharipande and Ravenhall, 1998

  36. Present observations of neutron stars masses M ' Mmax' 2.2 M¯ beginning to confront microscopic nuclear physics. High mass neutron stars => very stiff equation of state, with nc < 7n0. At this point for nucleonic equation of state, sound speed cs = ( P/)1/2  c. Naive theoretical predictions based on sharp deconfinement transition seemingly inconsistent with presence of (soft) bulk quark matter in neutron stars. Further degrees of freedom, e.g., hyperons, mesons, or quarks at n < 7n0 lower E/A => matter less stiff. Quark cores possible, only if quark matter is very stiff. » »

  37. Maximum mass of a neutron star Say that we believe equation of state up to mass density r0 but e.o.s. is uncertain beyond r(Rc) = r0 Weak bound: a) core not black hole => 2McG/c2 < Rc b) Mc = s0Rc d3r r(r) ³ (4p/3) r0Rc3 => c2Rc/2G ³ Mc ³ (4p/3) r0Rc3 Rs¯=2M¯ G/c2 = 2.94 km Mcmax = (3M¯/4pr0Rs¯3)1/2M¯ Mmax ³ 13.7 M¯ £(1014g/cm3/r0)1/2 4pr0Rc3/3 Outside material adds ~ 0.1 M¯

  38. Strong bound:require speed of sound, cs, in matter in core not to exceed speed of light: cs2 = ¶P/¶r£ c2 Maximum core mass when cs = c Rhodes and Ruffini (PRL 1974) WFF (1988) eq. of state => Mmax= 6.7M¯(1014g/cm3/r0)1/2 V. Kalogera and G.B., Ap. J. 469 (1996) L61 r0 = 4rnm => Mmax = 2.2 M¯ 2rnm => 2.9 M¯

  39. Can Mmax be larger? Larger Mmax requires larger sound speed cs at lower n. For nucleonic equation of state, cs -> c at n » 7n0. Further degrees of freedom, e.g., hyperons, mesons, or quarks at n » 7n0 lower E/A => matter less stiff. Stiffer e.o.s. at lower n => larger Mmax. If e.o.s. very stiff beyond n ' 2n0, Mmax can be as large as 2.9 M¯ . Stiffer e.o.s. => larger radii (cf. EXO0748-676).

  40. Gradual onset of quark degrees of freedom Normal Hadronic Color SC Quarks degrees of freedom -- not accounted for by nucleons interacting via static potentials -- expected to play role. As nucleons begin to overlap, matter percolates at (Quarks can still be bound even if deconfined!) Transition to quark matter likely crossover at low T nperc» 0.34 (3/4 rn3) Hatsuda, Tachibana, Yamamoto & GB, PRL 97, 122001 (2006)

  41. Gradual onset of quark degrees of freedom Normal Hadronic Color SC Quarks degrees of freedom -- not accounted for by nucleons interacting via static potentials -- expected to play role. As nucleons begin to overlap, matter percolates at (Quarks can still be bound even if deconfined!) Transition to quark matter likely a crossover at low T nperc» 0.34 (3/4 rn3) Hatsuda, Tachibana, Yamamoto & GB, PRL 97, 122001 (2006)

More Related